Re: Matt Hancock (again )
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Matt Hancock gave a PPE contract to his sisters company which he owned 20% of.
Then denied it when confronted and covered up the evidence.
In total he has been personally involved in more than £600,000,000 of PPE fraud.
Let’s investigate HIS bank account.
https://x.com/bladeofthes/status/178...LhmySD2aRt-GNg
Did the article or can you elaborate on the fraud? - what was it ?, how was Hancock involved in it ? , you and and the article owner should really say allegedly - unless of course someone can point to a court case, trial evidence - or even give some financial forensic evidence - perhaps ?.
Actual evidence is usually really useful in things like this apparently....
ps - for reference - I hope evidence is forthcoming and there is a court appearance for him
Re: Matt Hancock (again )
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pipster
Did the article or can you elaborate on the fraud? - what was it ?, how was Hancock involved in it ? , you and and the article owner should really say allegedly - unless of course someone can point to a court case, trial evidence - or even give some financial forensic evidence - perhaps ?.
Actual evidence is usually really useful in things like this apparently....
ps - for reference - I hope evidence is forthcoming and there is a court appearance for him
It’s an article on X , I’m sure like anything it’s down to individual people to make their own decisions. Try not to overthink things bro.
Meanwhile let's jail A Rayner for selling her council house......
Can we see Hancocks personal bank account please as the same government can see yours at anytime.
Re: Matt Hancock (again )
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TWGL1
Matt Hancock gave a PPE contract to his sisters company which he owned 20% of.
Then denied it when confronted and covered up the evidence.
In total he has been personally involved in more than £600,000,000 of PPE fraud.
Let’s investigate HIS bank account.
https://x.com/bladeofthes/status/178...LhmySD2aRt-GNg
Check his other posts.
Re: Matt Hancock (again )
But there are poor 60 plus year old carers to prosecute for 30p per week overpayments. Leave the bloke alone.
Re: Matt Hancock (again )
Hancock is an unappealing narcissist, if he is a criminal then he should be arrested and charged.
Re: Matt Hancock (again )
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Hancock is an unappealing narcissist, if he is a criminal then he should be arrested and charged.
The words “if he is a criminal then” aren’t necessary are they?
Re: Matt Hancock (again )
Chris Packham's response to Hancock's appearance in the London Marathon (Laura Kuenssberg programme yesterday) says it all!
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/...ncock-32636836