Widely varying performance levels from the City team last night in my view;-
Smithies 8
Richards 4
Morrison 7
Nelson 7
Bennett 6
Pack 6
Vaulks 7
Paterson 9
Hoilett 5
Glatzel 5
Whyte 7
Subs Tomlin 8
Bacuna 6
Bamba N/A
Printable View
Widely varying performance levels from the City team last night in my view;-
Smithies 8
Richards 4
Morrison 7
Nelson 7
Bennett 6
Pack 6
Vaulks 7
Paterson 9
Hoilett 5
Glatzel 5
Whyte 7
Subs Tomlin 8
Bacuna 6
Bamba N/A
Agree Richards was poor.
Paterson was good, but I think 9 is overstating it. Yes he worked really hard, but we failed to create any chances from open play, and were outplayed for most of the game.
I know what you mean about Paterson, but I thought he set the tone for others and it seems to me that quite often you need someone to do that with this group of players.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
I thought Smithes, Morrison, Nelson, Vaulks, Paterson and Tomlin did well. The rest were pretty poor.
Really glad we've settled on the CB pairing of Morrison and Nelson.
I'd start Tomlin over Glatzel and play Pato upfront from now on.
Shame it doesn't look like we will get anyone in.
Nelson was MOM for me, won loads of headers, and was very solid. Tomlin's cameo was superb, just goes to show what you can do with a proper skilful footballer in the team.
Whyte's run close to the end was fantastic too, shows what he's capable of
Would love to see WBAs ratings. One of the most overhyped teams I’ve seen as they were awful
Richards lucky to get a 4. He's either good or absolutely horrendous. Give me Peltier any day.
They weren't awful.Quote:
Originally Posted by WJ99mobile
They probably should have put us away