Wales-Bales and his opponents
Anyone else getting bored with the majority of threads getting hijacked by this lot?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
William Treseder
Anyone else getting bored with the majority of threads getting hijacked by this lot?
that's such a mainstream media opinion you sheep
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
that's such a mainstream media opinion you sheep
That's what they want you to think
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
That's what they want you to think
It is a globalist conspiracy.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pedro de la Rosa
It is a globalist conspiracy.
Just join up the dots.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
I'm confused. When am i supposed to believe Mainstream Media? Is it only when it reinforces my own views, then it's ok? Thing is, it's a bit hypocritical to constantly say that we are being fed constant shit by the MSM, then reference it for your own purposes when it suits you, like when a person hates the BBC and the red tops etc. For the jumpy nuts on here. This isn't an endorsement of the BBC or the Sun, or abuse towards a minor. just to make that clear, because that is usually the natural order of things when you question them.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Isn't the BBC legally bound to be impartial?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tuerto
I'm confused. When am i supposed to believe Mainstream Media? Is it only when it reinforces my own views, then it's ok? Thing is, it's a bit hypocritical to constantly say that we are being fed constant shit by the MSM, then reference it for your own purposes when it suits you, like when a person hates the BBC and the red tops etc. For the jumpy nuts on here. This isn't an endorsement of the BBC or the Sun, or abuse towards a minor. just to make that clear, because that is usually the natural order of things when you question them.
You are overthinking this, and possibly showing signs of cognitive dissonance. I was just quoting the original sources. If it had happened at GB News, and the family took their complaint to the The Guardian, then I would have used those sources instead.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
You are overthinking this, and possibly showing signs of cognitive dissonance. I was just quoting the original sources. If it had happened at GB News, and the family took their complaint to the The Guardian, then I would have used those sources instead.
Thanks for the possible Diagnosis clever clogs. So, explain to me when it is ok to believe MSM, as it's you that constantly tell us all that we're being sold a pup.Is it only when they write something you agree with? Clever boy!
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Folk don't like other narratives or views other than thier own , and in this new age of social media , one can easily sit on ones sofa and take the piss, insult , cancel , from afar in a hope they disappear, sadly many have , welcome to inclusiveness for all.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tuerto
Thanks for the possible Diagnosis clever clogs. So, explain to me when it is ok to believe MSM, as it's you that constantly tell us all that we're being sold a pup.Is it only when they write something you agree with? Clever boy!
Don't believe anything until you can confirm it yourself beyond reasonable doubt, no matter how long it takes. All data can be true, false or indeterminate, so it's best to to keep an open mind and avoid jumping to conclusions.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Don't believe anything until you can confirm it yourself beyond reasonable doubt, no matter how long it takes. All data can be true, false or indeterminate, so it's best to to keep an open mind and avoid jumping to conclusions.
How can you confirm things yourself? You just have to choose what is reasonable and what to believe. You don't know the name of the person that sent the photographs, the name of the mother, or the name of the person that has been accused. When you do find out, are you going to question each party yourself before making up your mind?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
How can you confirm things yourself? You just have to choose what is reasonable and what to believe. You don't know the name of the person that sent the photographs, the name of the mother, or the name of the person that has been accused. When you do find out, are you going to question each party yourself before making up your mind?
Wait for further data points if unsure, i.e. file under indeterminate.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Wait for further data points if unsure, i.e. file under indeterminate.
So you confirmed there was a "perv" before you started the other thread? Using your own logic surely that's something that ticks all the boxes to be filed under indeterminate?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
So you confirmed there was a "perv" before you started the other thread? Using your own logic surely that's something that ticks all the boxes to be filed under indeterminate?
It wasn't my claim, it was the parents as reported the The Sun. It is still indeterminate for me along with many other things.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
It wasn't my claim, it was the parents as reported the The Sun. It is still indeterminate for me along with many other things.
The word "pervert" wasn't used in the link to the Sun you posted. So I was just wondering what further data points you were able to identify before using it in your thread title. Also, why post at all about something so salacious if the only evidence you have is indeterminate?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
The word "pervert" wasn't used in the link to the Sun you posted. So I was just wondering what further data points you were able to identify before using it in your thread title. Also, why post at all about something so salacious if the only evidence you have is indeterminate?
3 people at the BBC came out and said they weren't involved in the alleged behaviour with an underage minor, hence their statements implied in a very clear manner that they weren't perverted individuals, and furthermore I didn't post MY evidence, I posted a news report. Anyway case closed, you are just being silly now.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
3 people at the BBC came out and said they weren't involved in the alleged behaviour with an underage minor, hence their statements implied in a very clear manner that they weren't perverted individuals, and furthermore I didn't post MY evidence, I posted a news report. Anyway case closed, you are just being silly now.
Wow. That is so weak I feel embarrassed for you. And you've come up with a lot of weak arguments recently.
You decided to create a thread and used the word "pervert" in the title after reading a Sun article which did not reference that word. YOU don't have any evidence. And you never will. You get all your news from other sources. Just like everyone else that isn't a journalist or a witness to actual events. What am I not getting here?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
Wow. That is so weak I feel embarrassed for you. And you've come up with a lot of weak arguments recently.
You decided to create a thread and used the word "pervert" in the title after reading a Sun article which did not reference that word. YOU don't have any evidence. And you never will. You get all your news from other sources. Just like everyone else that isn't a journalist or a witness to actual events. What am I not getting here?
I suggest you read the first post again, and like the OP said it's feckin boring, so go and find yourself a new hobby or something.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Ruins almost every thread. It's pointless posting about the subject matter, because the post just gets lost in the constant back and forth with Wales Bales.
It's even happened in this this thread! :hehe: From the second post onward it's turned to an argument from other threads :shrug:
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
3 people at the BBC came out and said they weren't involved in the alleged behaviour with an underage minor, hence their statements implied in a very clear manner that they weren't perverted individuals, and furthermore I didn't post MY evidence, I posted a news report. Anyway case closed, you are just being silly now.
Where are you getting 'underage minor' from?
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J R Hartley
Where are you getting 'underage minor' from?
From the Sun who said the young person was 17 when it started.
Re: Wales-Bales and his opponents
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlueArmy 86
Ruins almost every thread. It's pointless posting about the subject matter, because the post just gets lost in the constant back and forth with Wales Bales.
It's even happened in this this thread! :hehe: From the second post onward it's turned to an argument from other threads :shrug:
It's mad innit :hehe: