Another irrelevant response, do try harder.
Emojis are not the answer.
Try and answer constructively
Printable View
Is that all you got ,come on add some substance ,wtf is snowflake poker, is it a thing , surely you can apply more depth to your response .
I know the election is over and your hurting ,Insee fruit loop Trump is still lingering , you must have something in yer anti western locker ?
https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-...ran-planned-to
Pentagon chief says he 'didn't see' intelligence suggesting Iran planned to attack four US embassies
This is the intel that we keep hearing about from the experts on here. The Secretary of Defence - I repeat - THE SECRETARY OF DEFENCE says that he didn't see any intelligence about attacks on embassies, but Trump said that there "probably" "could" have been attacks... and that's now enough proof to order a strike on a foreign target and send troops to the Middle East (the region that the resident Trumpists praised him for removing troops from a few months ago when he stabbed the Kurds in the back in order to suck up to Turkey).Quote:
“What the president said was he believed there probably and could've been attacks against additional embassies. I shared that view. I know other members of the national security team shared that view. That’s why I deployed thousands of American paratroopers to the Middle East to reinforce our embassy in Baghdad and other sites throughout the region,” Esper said.
He added that Trump did not cite a “specific piece of evidence.”
“Are you saying there wasn't one?” host Margaret Brennan asked.
“I didn't see one with regard to four embassies,” Esper responded. “What I’m saying is I share the president's view.”
In the words of our resident nutter... this is just the beginning. Get ready for the real show.
https://edition.cnn.com/videos/polit...k-in-politics/
Yikes. That's damning.
(in before WB and Nelson - "CNN :hehe: :hehe: :hehe: " even though it's an interview with Esper :hehe:)
I wonder if, on a Tehran FC message board, there's someone desperately trying to convince that the current protestors have been bussed in and given expenses for the day.
So were the protesters bussed in to protest about the shooting down of the plane? :sherlock:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNG3masj1Ek
Let's take it all at face value and assume everything to be true.
There were four embassies under threat. At Wednesdays security briefing with the 'Gang of Eight' members of Congress, this was deemed so secret that it shouldn't be shared with them in case it revealed sources and methods to them. (As Esper said in a CBS interview https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...ntv/index.html)
But by Friday, it was fine for Trump to tell the world?
Surely even the most gullible and sycophantic of Trump's fans (maybe we have one or two here who could help out) can't see this doesn't add up.
There is a reasonable bit of meat there to get your teeth into. You said intelligence sources from NATOME countries provided the evidence of the imminent threat that Suleimani was posing which justified his assassination. Trump went on Fox News to say that this imminent threat involved attacks on four US embassies.
His own Secretary of Defense said he had no evidence of this. Congressmen and Senators from both sides of the aisle said that nowhere in the inadequate intelligence briefings that they received from the Trump administration did this appear.
Until now you have railed against flimsy or false reasons for warlike acts. You said you stopped voting Labour after Blair and Iraq. This follows a similar pattern and we know how your truffle hound mind loves a pattern. Why not do some digging and put your sceptical mind at rest rather than superficial responses that sit 180 degrees from your previous reactions?
Without a sense of irony, the guy who used to trawl the depths of the internet for his information now says if you challenge something in a white house press release or trump speech you should move to Tehran.
18 months since I last engaged with him, but I see my stalker's fascination with me continues.
I post and he replies in three minutes, then again 11 minutes later.
I post once more and he replies in ten minutes.
How long will he take this time? Let's start the clock.