-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Fair play WB has excelled himself today. No sooner is he bellowing about who paid for Ms Ford's polygraph as being a major issue before we get posted without critique the review of her testimony by the Republican appointed to and paid to interrogate her on behalf of the all male senators who found themselves unable to perform their responsibilities as if it is an example of credible independent insight. There is no start to his objectivity!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Fair play WB has excelled himself today. No sooner is he bellowing about who paid for Ms Ford's polygraph as being a major issue before we get posted without critique the review of her testimony by the Republican appointed to and paid to interrogate her on behalf of the all male senators who found themselves unable to perform their responsibilities as if it is an example of credible independent insight. There is no start to his objectivity!
She was hired by the Senate Judiciary Committee, so that Ms. Ford could feel as comfortable as possible during the hearing. The Democrats also had full access to her expertise in sex crime interviews, but they declined to use it! Get your facts straight!!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
She was hired by the Senate Judiciary Committee, so that Ms. Ford could feel as comfortable as possible during the hearing. The Democrats also had full access to her expertise in sex crime interviews, but they declined to use it! Get your facts straight!!
Who runs the Senate Judiciary Committee out of factual interest? She seems to have failed as an interrogator and is now trying to appease her paymasters by producing post event memos when people could conclude on Ms Ford's credibility by watching her testimony.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
posted without critique
You are welcome to critique the facts, I await your comments with interest.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Who runs the Senate Judiciary Committee out of factual interest? She seems to have failed as an interrogator and is now trying to appease her paymasters by producing post event memos when people could conclude on Ms Ford's credibility by watching her testimony.
The facts and her performance are two different things.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Oh yeah, the two front doors may have something to do with an Airbnb type of arrangement, and the planning application was made a few years prior to 2012. There also seems to be some confusion about her resume, she is no longer a Psychologist, and has now become a Associate. I wonder how the FBI are getting on with their investigation?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
The facts and her performance are two different things.
In your opinion.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
In your opinion.
How can a convincing performance hindered by a lack of material facts be anything different?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
.
Pleased to see you took heed on being more succinct. Good work and unusually good post from you!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...eborah-ramirez
If Kavanaugh had more sense of occasion surely he would have thrown Red Red Wine!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
He should have been charged just for liking UB40!
"Kavanaugh was among those questioned in relation to the incident but was not arrested. There was also no indication any charges were filed."
Another nothingburger to go with your red wine :biggrin:
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Oh yeah, the two front doors may have something to do with an Airbnb type of arrangement, and the planning application was made a few years prior to 2012. There also seems to be some confusion about her resume, she is no longer a Psychologist, and has now become a Associate. I wonder how the FBI are getting on with their investigation?
Where did you see this about her being an associate?
Everything I have seen says she is a professor of psychology
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Elwood Blues
Where did you see this about her being an associate?
Everything I have seen says she is a professor of psychology
Uder California law, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. Can you provide any evidence that this has happened, and that she is indeed a licensed psychologist?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Uder California law, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. Can you provide any evidence that this has happened, and that she is indeed a licensed psychologist?
He asked where you saw it. It wasn't a tricky question
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
He asked where you saw it. It wasn't a tricky question
It means you can't can call yourself a psychologist on your CV, the same way a law school graduate can't call themselves an attorney without passing the Bar exam.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
It means you can't can call yourself a psychologist on your CV, the same way a law school graduate can't call themselves an attorney without passing the Bar exam.
He didn't ask what you thought it meant, he asked where you saw it!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
He didn't ask what you thought it meant, he asked where you saw it!
On her profile, which has now been corrected.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
On her profile, which has now been corrected.
Let me help you here.
https://www.dangerous.com/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ch...-psychologist/
Anything else in your box or innuendo?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
She is no longer identifying as a psychologist on her profile. Wouldn't you be a little incensed if you had spent 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passed two rigorous exams, only to find others were incorrectly using this title?
Thanks for the Snopes link and the definitive truth! :biggrin:
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
She is no longer identifying as a psychologist on her profile. Wouldn't you be a little incensed if you had spent 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passed two rigorous exams, only to find others were incorrectly using this title?
Thanks for the Snopes link and the definitive truth! :biggrin:
Glad to see you are going to Milo Yannopolous for your facts.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Glad to see you are going to Milo Yannopolous for your facts.
I wonder how the Kavanaugh FBI investigation is going? The leaks have been surprisingly thin on the ground.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I wonder how the Kavanaugh FBI investigation is going? The leaks have been surprisingly thin on the ground.
Start with a slur, end with a deflection. Another day in paradise
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Start with a slur, end with a deflection. Another day in paradise
What slur was that? You can't call yourself a psychologist if you are not registered and haven't passed the exams. Do you embellish your CV too?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
What slur was that? You can't call yourself a psychologist if you are not registered and haven't passed the exams. Do you embellish your CV too?
The slur is your attempt to imply that this somehow diminishes the credibility of the witness. It's beyond pathetic.