Why is she getting roasted on Twitter?
Printable View
Why is she getting roasted on Twitter?
I caught some of her remarks about encryption this morning. I imagine she wants more snooping powers on the back of what happened in London some days back, and that some people who pay attention to and are concerned about the never ending incremental changes to liberties are getting their hair off. From everything I've seen of her she strikes me as very lightweight for a Home Secretary.
So what do suggest she does, or what we do ,because this is not good and people are dying.
This is more regarding what she's on about: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politic...pdown-10105142
I Like this bit:
And Lib Dem Home Affairs Spokesman Brian Paddick said what Ms Rudd is proposing was “draconian”. He said: “These terrorists want to destroy our freedoms and undermine our democratic society.
“By implementing draconian laws that limit our civil liberties, we would be playing into their hands."
It's not just terrorists who want to destroy our freedoms; it's those governments who create, fund and arm ISIS and the like - and Russia isn't amongst those governments.
I propose the immediate banning of all motor vehicles, kitchen utensils and mobile phones.
Most definitely.
You hear some politicians and they are just so uninspiring. I meet people in my day to day life that are far more impressive.
She comes across as a bang average politician that you'd find in a safe seat.
Theresa probably hired her because she will wilt any do anything she says. She can mold her after doing the role. Not that that will be much different to any of her other cronies.
"No sooner had May proclaimed a commitment to the spirit of freedom than her officials were hinting at increased state control of the internet and new forms of spying on citizens’ conversations. After last week’s attack we should reclaim freedom from those who seek to erode it – and that includes May’s government"
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite...2#.WNkJnvkrJPY
She's called Amber because she's piss poor.
Don't forget the numberplate recognition system would be flashing alerts about the suspicious activities of cars around London. Somebody on here has worked on systems where all your details flash up when you call the authorities. I'm pretty sure it would be trivial to link the hire car drivers to the numberplate recognition system in realtime too, similar to what they are doing with airline manifests. When you hire a car your details could automatically be sent to government computers.
Slot keir starmer into incredibly unimpressive politicians category.
His first comment was that we needed to stay in the EU to fight the threats the world faces. Terrorism etc.
I could feel the collective rolling of eyes through my TV.
Not even Salmond resorted to that sort of pre referendum rubbish. He brought nothing to the debate. And he is the shadow brexit secretary!.
I missed the very start but wasn't he talking about the potential problem of 'no deal'?
I think he was a bit wooden but what can anyone add to the debate? We are leaving. Clegg can sit there and try and convince everyone to change their mind but it isn't happening. KS seemed unusually balanced (for a politician), praised May's efforts in certain areas but then held her to account for other things. It wasn't flashy but I thought he came across quite well.
Starmer was is not a natural but compared with May he is positively charismatic.
As for Rudd she is out of her depth but not quote as hopeless as Liz Truss who has the gravitas of a goldfish
I would ban knifes in the UK if you are worried about people dying! 9 teenagers already this year, although funnily enough nobody is counting. Literally they don't count the deaths!
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/knifecrime
"WhatsApp accused of giving terrorists 'a secret place to hide' as it refuses to hand over London attacker's messages"
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...ts-place-hide/
I wonder what they are going to do about it...