The winner takes it all!
https://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/news...-competitions/
I don't see the need myself. It risks removing the skill from the coin toss.
Printable View
The winner takes it all!
https://www.cardiffcityfc.co.uk/news...-competitions/
I don't see the need myself. It risks removing the skill from the coin toss.
Sounds like they're over thinking it.
“IFAB have identified a theory that the current arrangements for penalty kicks potentially provide an unfair advantage to the team taking the first kick"
Surely, a simple look at the statistics will show whether or not there's an advantage.
The statistics do show an advantage, the theory is about why there is one. The statement is not great I guess, but it's much better to go first in the current system.Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
Similar structure to a tennis tie break
Why don't they say the side with most corner kicks wins and be done with all this nonsense.
I know, you're going to say "what if that's level as well" !
well clever clogs, the side who hit the woodwork most times.
Put it this way, "anything bar penalties"
A thread on pelanties and everyone has spelt it wrong..
Duh.:facepalm:
Why don't they have no time limit to extra time and play golden goal rule
They did golden goal in Euro 96 and 00, and it was rubbish.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
As long as we can have Bjorn and Benny then I'm all for it.
so which player in team B is going to be the first to say 'take a chance on me'
Fernando.Quote:
Originally Posted by TISS
Quote:
Originally Posted by TISS
Shame we still haven't got Whitts. He'd be first up to take a pen, grabbing the ball off the ref, Gimme, gimme, gimme.Quote:
Originally Posted by itkman
No doubt the FA think this will make the game more marketable. All they think about is Money, money, money.
That's the name of the game....Quote:
Originally Posted by itkman
Fak, that one's been done.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick
For West Ham it will obviously be their new signing...chiquitita.Quote:
Originally Posted by TISS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick
As in my gag, not yours.Quote:
Originally Posted by itkman
I feel that there are too many trials for rule changes being spoken about. You don't have to change a number of things all at once.
Mamma Mia!Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick
circa:-Splott Park in the 1960's, coats for goalposts, you're losing 17-12, but it's nearly tea-time.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
Only way to solve it is "last goal the winner" :hehe::hehe::hehe:
I would change it so that players had to hit the ball on the full rather than from the penalty spot. What's your volley view?
How about the hockey way?
One player with the ball from, say, centre spot, has ten seconds to score or fail.
Think they tried that in the MLS a few years back.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobh
Better than the shit we got nowQuote:
Originally Posted by BLUETIT
Would've been robbed of the Ben Turner moment if that had been the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
As has been mentioned, they did this in the States many years ago, Best and Marsh era if i recall correctly, and it was better to watch than pelanties.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobh
I reckon they should play extra time then every time the ball goes dead, both teams take a player off.
Bound to get a goal at some point without it going on too long and the strategic skill on show would be good entertainment.
I have no problem with penalties.
Except how to spell it.Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
You know the CCMB rules. :hehe:
What about releasing a random wild animal onto the pitch (brown bear, crocodile, T. rex etc.)?Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUETIT
First player that bottles it and leaves the field of play loses the game.
Winner.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Lecter
You are now the head of FIFA,pick up your wages from the third bin on the left behind headquarters, cant miss it, brown paper bag as usual.