http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39798344
The sooner we're out of Europe and we can get back to proper British rules up the better.
Printable View
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39798344
The sooner we're out of Europe and we can get back to proper British rules up the better.
I like it
Personally I'd do away with pens and go back to extra time golden goal with a twist. Take 2 players off at the end of 90 then 1 every 10 minutes until someone scores.
Involves more skill and tactics than a penalty shoot out
What happens when it's just the 2 keepers on the pitch?Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
You play with 7 minimum to 30 mins max then go to a penalty shoot outQuote:
Originally Posted by itkman
Quote:
Originally Posted by itkman
What if one of the teams has previously had a man sent off?Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Let's just scrap the penalties and toss a coin like they used to.
John Terry would still be allowed to put on his kit for the toss up if he wasn't in the squad.
They play with 1 less obviouslyQuote:
Originally Posted by itkman
Yeah, but do they only then have a maximum of 10 minutes of extra time because they'd be down to 7 men sooner? Not sure your idea is a goer TBHQuote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
It's not rocket science you take 2 men off after 90 mins so if someone is sent off and it's 11 v 10 it then it becomes 9 v 8, 8v 7, 7 v 6. 3 x 10 min periods. If after 30 mins maximum still can't separate you go to pens.Quote:
Originally Posted by itkman
Or 15 mins per 2 extra time periods as now and go 9v9 first period then if no golden goal then 7v7.
No more extra time than now and more likely to get a winner especially if golden goal.
Nah, all sounds a bit convoluted to me. Keep thinking up the ideas though, something will stick sooner or later. :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Better to adopt the hockey-style shoot-out.
One player takes ball from eg, centre spot, has a fixed time to beat keeper.
Mad as hatter me, what about taking the penalties "FIRST" :wave:
Just putting it out there.
ie:---- Before KO.
Undue pressure on one side to win, the other side to 'park the bus' ?Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUETIT
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUETIT
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobh
But, (NSASWB:hehe:), if the park the bus side conceded, then game on.
What about the FIRST side to score wins if tied after 120mins.
What about "CORNER COUNT"
They trialled that in a cup comp in the 70s (can't recall which one.. Intertoto or some crap, probably.Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUETIT
All of these ideas are worse than a pelanty shootout, and pelanties are hardly perfect.
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
If the scores remain level after extra time simply let the teams share the spoils, trophies for everyone!
Correct PC. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi
just keep playing until someone scores
it's like left wing politics but in football.Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi
Approximately 60% of penalty shootouts are won by the team going first. If this makes it more even, then it is a good idea. It is more like a tie break in tennis. Over 70% of penalties are scored to win the tie but if you have to score to stay in, this drops to about 30%.Quote:
Originally Posted by itkman
Alternatively, nobody wins.Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel Cærdiffi
If you're not good enough to win the game after two hours then you don't deserve the trophy.
Next time, make more effort.