https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9Htf3Jr2cI
Printable View
Uncalled for.
Three-match ban, minimum.
That's ABH, he deserves more like a 5 to 10 match minimum. The ball boy was only doing his job, he wasn't preventing Liam Kelly from getting the ball. Totally uncalled for.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobh
Should have been sent off. They scored two goals at the death as well.Doubt they would have with only ten men.
Didn't Hazard do the same in Swansea v Chelsea match?
Yeah but that little pikey bastard deserved it!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleve van Leef
Difference is, that was seen by the ref, so Hazard got sent off and got a 3 match ban.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleve van Leef
The Leyton thing wasn't so retro punishment can be anything the FA thinks fit.
The ref was standing there facing it when it happened and walked towards it afterwards reaching into his pocket. He seriously did nothing about it??Quote:
Originally Posted by bobh
He dived.
Read the full youtube description.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Cartman
"Kelly was booked for a 70th-minute foul on Ryan Donaldson, but no action was taken at the time by referee Chris Sarginson for the alleged push on the ball boy."
I would ban the ref for longer than the player imoQuote:
Originally Posted by bobh
I don"t think that there was anything "alleged" about the push.
To be fair , it was a pretty good push.
The ball boy played for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Cartman
The difference here is that the ball boy (bit old mind?) was passing the ball back to the orient player. The jack **** lay on top of the ball and refused to give it back.
That said though, it was hardly abh either
didnt hazard give the gypo a kick aswell ? ? ?Quote:
Originally Posted by ken smith
This isn't the music fred.Quote:
Originally Posted by Llanedeyrnblue