Sang

Printable View

20-03-21, 20:52
Bobby Dandruff

Sang

It has only been a handful of games but Sang looks quite comfortable at RB.

So why did a Harris play Bacuna there instead of giving Sang a go?

🤷
20-03-21, 20:53
LeningradCowboy

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff

It has only been a handful of games but Sang looks quite comfortable at RB.

So why did a Harris play Bacuna there instead of giving Sang a go?

��

Because Sang was on loan at Cheltenham.
20-03-21, 20:54
valleys caveman

Re: Sang

Sang was quality tonight I thought. In fact I don't think one City player had a poor game.
20-03-21, 21:01
2b2bdoo

Re: Sang

Thought he was excellent today, couldn't have done more.

We have gone from having real issues at right back to two good options in Ng and Sang.

To be honest I think Bacuna would also be suited to wingback now rather than RB which didn't suit him.

I think it comes down to Harris being to rigid in terms of selection and his pool of players.
20-03-21, 21:27
Bobby Dandruff

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeningradCowboy

Because Sang was on loan at Cheltenham.

And we couldn’t recall him?
20-03-21, 21:31
Eric the Half a Bee

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by valleys caveman

Sang was quality tonight I thought. In fact I don't think one City player had a poor game.

I thought his touch and passing was streets ahead of most of the other City players on the pitch tonight.
20-03-21, 22:06
Bobby Dandruff

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee

I thought his touch and passing was streets ahead of most of the other City players on the pitch tonight.

Yes I have liked what I have seen of him so far.

Yet further evidence of Harris’ absolutely abysmal management when the potential answer to one of our biggest problems (no RB) was sitting under his nose. Pitiful.
20-03-21, 22:11
Eric the Half a Bee

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff

Yes I have liked what I have seen of him so far.

Yet further evidence of Harris’ absolutely abysmal management when the potential answer to one of our biggest problems (no RB) was sitting under his nose. Pitiful.

Agreed.
20-03-21, 22:14
stevebrickman

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff

Yes I have liked what I have seen of him so far.

Yet further evidence of Harris’ absolutely abysmal management when the potential answer to one of our biggest problems (no RB) was sitting under his nose. Pitiful.

Its staggering, really. Sang has taken to league football like a duck to water. Why wasnt he ever given a chance before Mick came in (and was desperate!)? I genuinely think he's looked one of our stronger players lately.
20-03-21, 22:19
olderblue

Re: Sang

He wasn't given a chance because we had David Brent in charge who was ****ing clueless
20-03-21, 22:19
Des Parrot

Re: Sang

He looks composed an unusual trait in this team!
20-03-21, 22:27
B. Oddie

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff

And we couldn’t recall him?

Sometimes it's because there's a fee involved.
20-03-21, 22:38
2b2bdoo

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by B. Oddie

Sometimes it's because there's a fee involved.

It asks the question if he should have been sent out. Let be honest tho he would never have played him anyway.
20-03-21, 22:40
surge

Re: Sang

He played well defensively in largely nullifying Norrington-Davies against Stoke but I didn't feel he was on top defensively against his full-back today. Both our wing backs have the advantage that even if they don't stop the cross our CB's are going to win 9/10 anyway so it never appears that they're giving away good chances.

Offensively, has he put in any good crosses yet?

It's very early on in his career and there is plenty to like including having the first touch of more similar to Pack and energy more similar to Vaulks, but let's not go too overboard yet. He hasn't looked out of place at all.
20-03-21, 22:50
Eric the Half a Bee

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Des Parrot

He looks composed an unusual trait in this team!

:hehe: Absolutely right.
20-03-21, 22:51
Splott-light...

Re: Sang

...a song of sixpence
20-03-21, 22:53
City123

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by surge

He played well defensively in largely nullifying Norrington-Davies against Stoke but I didn't feel he was on top defensively against his full-back today. Both our wing backs have the advantage that even if they don't stop the cross our CB's are going to win 9/10 anyway so it never appears that they're giving away good chances.

Offensively, has he put in any good crosses yet?

It's very early on in his career and there is plenty to like including having the first touch of more similar to Pack and energy more similar to Vaulks, but let's not go too overboard yet. He hasn't looked out of place at all.

Sang was great, Swansea played less on the left hand side in the second half than they did in the first and started targeting Ralls instead (who was also brilliant today).
20-03-21, 22:56
Pedro de la Rosa

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff

And we couldn’t recall him?

We couldn't recall Sang. It was outside of a transfer window. Harris is the one who gave him a chance, too.

Sang has been fantastic and credit to MM for giving him a continued run in the side :thumbup:
20-03-21, 23:14
Elwood Blues

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Dandruff

And we couldn’t recall him?

No you can't recall 1/2 season loans
20-03-21, 23:17
surge

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by City123

Sang was great, Swansea played less on the left hand side in the second half than they did in the first and started targeting Ralls instead (who was also brilliant today).

I'm wondering if Ralls has found a new position for himself. He's looked out of sorts in CM recently but has always had energy, a decent final ball and willingness to do the dirty work.
20-03-21, 23:20
Pedro de la Rosa

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by surge

I'm wondering if Ralls has found a new position for himself. He's looked out of sorts in CM recently but has always had energy, a decent final ball and willingness to do the dirty work.

He's looked out of sorts coming back into the side from injury, in a side that wasn't playing well! I think those writing off Ralls are being very premature.
20-03-21, 23:22
BLUETIT

Re: Sang

So peeps, is it a case of trusting Magic Mick (and his staff), to finally trust our youngsters ?
20-03-21, 23:42
life on mars

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa

He's looked out of sorts coming back into the side from injury, in a side that wasn't playing well! I think those writing off Ralls are being very premature.

Rall's is a decent player at this level, can't understand the stick he gets as his worth ethic ans and commitment are excellent.
20-03-21, 23:53
2b2bdoo

Re: Sang

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa

He's looked out of sorts coming back into the side from injury, in a side that wasn't playing well! I think those writing off Ralls are being very premature.

Totally agree.

Ralls doesn't offer the width needed imo.
I think he's the first choice in CM when fit.