-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Oh yeah, the two front doors may have something to do with an Airbnb type of arrangement, and the planning application was made a few years prior to 2012. There also seems to be some confusion about her resume, she is no longer a Psychologist, and has now become a Associate. I wonder how the FBI are getting on with their investigation?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
The facts and her performance are two different things.
In your opinion.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
In your opinion.
How can a convincing performance hindered by a lack of material facts be anything different?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
.
Pleased to see you took heed on being more succinct. Good work and unusually good post from you!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...eborah-ramirez
If Kavanaugh had more sense of occasion surely he would have thrown Red Red Wine!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
He should have been charged just for liking UB40!
"Kavanaugh was among those questioned in relation to the incident but was not arrested. There was also no indication any charges were filed."
Another nothingburger to go with your red wine :biggrin:
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Oh yeah, the two front doors may have something to do with an Airbnb type of arrangement, and the planning application was made a few years prior to 2012. There also seems to be some confusion about her resume, she is no longer a Psychologist, and has now become a Associate. I wonder how the FBI are getting on with their investigation?
Where did you see this about her being an associate?
Everything I have seen says she is a professor of psychology
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Elwood Blues
Where did you see this about her being an associate?
Everything I have seen says she is a professor of psychology
Uder California law, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. Can you provide any evidence that this has happened, and that she is indeed a licensed psychologist?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Uder California law, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. Can you provide any evidence that this has happened, and that she is indeed a licensed psychologist?
He asked where you saw it. It wasn't a tricky question
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
He asked where you saw it. It wasn't a tricky question
It means you can't can call yourself a psychologist on your CV, the same way a law school graduate can't call themselves an attorney without passing the Bar exam.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
It means you can't can call yourself a psychologist on your CV, the same way a law school graduate can't call themselves an attorney without passing the Bar exam.
He didn't ask what you thought it meant, he asked where you saw it!
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
He didn't ask what you thought it meant, he asked where you saw it!
On her profile, which has now been corrected.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
On her profile, which has now been corrected.
Let me help you here.
https://www.dangerous.com/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ch...-psychologist/
Anything else in your box or innuendo?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
She is no longer identifying as a psychologist on her profile. Wouldn't you be a little incensed if you had spent 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passed two rigorous exams, only to find others were incorrectly using this title?
Thanks for the Snopes link and the definitive truth! :biggrin:
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
She is no longer identifying as a psychologist on her profile. Wouldn't you be a little incensed if you had spent 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passed two rigorous exams, only to find others were incorrectly using this title?
Thanks for the Snopes link and the definitive truth! :biggrin:
Glad to see you are going to Milo Yannopolous for your facts.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Glad to see you are going to Milo Yannopolous for your facts.
I wonder how the Kavanaugh FBI investigation is going? The leaks have been surprisingly thin on the ground.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I wonder how the Kavanaugh FBI investigation is going? The leaks have been surprisingly thin on the ground.
Start with a slur, end with a deflection. Another day in paradise
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Start with a slur, end with a deflection. Another day in paradise
What slur was that? You can't call yourself a psychologist if you are not registered and haven't passed the exams. Do you embellish your CV too?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
What slur was that? You can't call yourself a psychologist if you are not registered and haven't passed the exams. Do you embellish your CV too?
The slur is your attempt to imply that this somehow diminishes the credibility of the witness. It's beyond pathetic.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
The slur is your attempt to imply that this somehow diminishes the credibility of the witness. It's beyond pathetic.
Everybody already has an embedded opinion regarding her testimony, I don't think any factual discussion is going to change what people think. Obviously that may change if the FBI come out with any startling revelations.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
It's come out that Bart O'K knew about the Ramirez allegations long before they became public. Some interesting question and answers here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...675619841.html
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Bart ain't all that good a choice anyway, he's far too wimpy. I hope they select somebody who is way better than him.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Everybody already has an embedded opinion regarding her testimony, I don't think any factual discussion is going to change what people think. Obviously that may change if the FBI come out with any startling revelations.
Really? I remember saying that she sounded credible but there were inconsistencies in her testimony. Some of us make an effort to be even-minded rather than continually seeing just one side of an argument.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taunton Blue Genie
Really? I remember saying that she sounded credible but there were inconsistencies in her testimony. Some of us make an effort to be even-minded rather than continually seeing just one side of an argument.
I am even minded, I formed my opinion on what I saw and heard. There were lots of gaps in her account which kept changing over time.
Were the two from doors an inconsistency in your mind? How about the therapist she won't name?
https://www.realclearinvestigations....r_account.html
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I am even minded, I formed my opinion on what I saw and heard. There were lots of gaps in her account which kept changing over time.
Were the two from doors an inconsistency in your mind? How about the therapist she won't name?
https://www.realclearinvestigations....r_account.html
Apologies for my not noticing that you had also flagged up all the inconsistencies about his descriptions about his general behaviour in his youth (which are probably outright lies) that I mentioned and which I thought made him unsuitable for the post he is seeking. I have mistakenly been under the impression that you were just banging on endlessly about her inconsistencies.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I am even minded, I formed my opinion on what I saw and heard. There were lots of gaps in her account which kept changing over time.
Were the two from doors an inconsistency in your mind? How about the therapist she won't name?
https://www.realclearinvestigations....r_account.html
Apologies for my not noticing that you had also flagged up all the inconsistencies about his descriptions about his general behaviour in his youth (which are probably outright lies) that I mentioned and which I thought made him unsuitable for the post he is seeking. I must have missed that.
And how can everyone's views be considered as 'embedded' when people like me have neither declared him guilty of the alleged the offence nor accused her of lying as yet?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
My reference to her possibly lying was meant to be in respect of possibly fabricating the story of the attack on her rather than inconsistencies in her reports of it, which I have already acknowledged.
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taunton Blue Genie
Apologies for my not noticing that you had also flagged up all the inconsistencies about his descriptions about his general behaviour in his youth (which are probably outright lies) that I mentioned and which I thought made him unsuitable for the post he is seeking. I must have missed that.
And how can everyone's views be considered as 'embedded' when people like me have neither declared him guilty of the alleged the offence nor accused her of lying as yet?
Still waiting for the FBI report on him, should be today or tomorrow?
-
Re: Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Taunton Blue Genie
My reference to her possibly lying was meant to be in respect of possibly fabricating the story of the attack on her rather than inconsistencies in her reports of it, which I have already acknowledged.
The scope for what she could have fabricated is increasing by the day.