Any consequences?
Discuss.
Printable View
Any consequences?
Discuss.
Yeah. Glad I don’t read the news. Sounds ****ing depressing.
And right up the streets of idiots who lap it all up.
Throw this in for good measure :
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/25/w...anka-port.html
Essentially it's another Hong Kong. Part of China for 99 yrs. The Chinese knew the Sri Lankan's would be able to continue paying the loans. Very, very, clever.
And now, of course :
https://www.huawei.com/uk/
The absurd obsession with the Soviet Union/Russia for 70 yrs has blinkered the UK into realizing the genuine danger out there..
Leave the Russians alone they are lovely folk, they dont kill, invade countries , supress its people , their human rights are second to none, and they do not believe in state intervention .
That Crimean and Salisbury stuff was pure nonsense .
And i wish we could have the same free democratic elections as they do .
It's a question of where is the threat to the UK. The Russians are particularly unpleasant true, but the Crimea voted something like 98% to return to Russia. Wouldn't call that undemocratic..Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
I'd say the Yanks are deserving of the particularly unpleasant title. Since the list was compiled they've bombed Syria while also illegally occupying part of their territory to pinch their oil, as confirmed by Neocon Don just the other day.
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qim...a5d3f2323.webp
That referendum isn't recognised by most countries.Quote:
Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish
Any election that is 95%+ should set undemocratic alarm bells ringing.
Russian annexation was carried out with weaponry not democracy or agreement folk diedQuote:
Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28345039