https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/footb...ealed-14235568
Printable View
Article states that Burnley were the lowest, but we spent less than then.
Not entirely sure why spurs paid £11 million
Contract renewalsQuote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
I am sure they have earned it and that society benefits from their efforts. Lovely people I’m sure
Whilst I'm sure agents will pay as little tax & NI as possible, there's a considerable chuck of money which society will benefit from - probably £15 million or thereabouts...Quote:
Originally Posted by Optimistic Nick
Having said that, they do absolutely F.A. for their money..
Wolves and Fulham both spent around £100m but Wolves fees about a third of Fulham's? So they connection with that agent seems to work.
I’ve said it before, if a player wants an agent to represent them, let the player pay them. Agent fees will soon come down to realistic levels. Clubs can employ an agent to handle all their transfers for a reasonable (in context) salary.