Printable View
Matt Hancock gave a PPE contract to his sisters company which he owned 20% of.
Then denied it when confronted and covered up the evidence.
In total he has been personally involved in more than £600,000,000 of PPE fraud.
Let’s investigate HIS bank account.
https://x.com/bladeofthes/status/178...LhmySD2aRt-GNg
Did the article or can you elaborate on the fraud? - what was it ?, how was Hancock involved in it ? , you and and the article owner should really say allegedly - unless of course someone can point to a court case, trial evidence - or even give some financial forensic evidence - perhaps ?.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
Actual evidence is usually really useful in things like this apparently....
ps - for reference - I hope evidence is forthcoming and there is a court appearance for him
It’s an article on X , I’m sure like anything it’s down to individual people to make their own decisions. Try not to overthink things bro.Quote:
Originally Posted by pipster
Meanwhile let's jail A Rayner for selling her council house......
Can we see Hancocks personal bank account please as the same government can see yours at anytime.
Check his other posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
But there are poor 60 plus year old carers to prosecute for 30p per week overpayments. Leave the bloke alone.
Hancock is an unappealing narcissist, if he is a criminal then he should be arrested and charged.
The words “if he is a criminal then” aren’t necessary are they?Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
Chris Packham's response to Hancock's appearance in the London Marathon (Laura Kuenssberg programme yesterday) says it all!
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/...ncock-32636836