Warnock said on the channel 5 football show after on the show week before they said it was nearly 3m so he wrote in to point it out
Printable View
Warnock said on the channel 5 football show after on the show week before they said it was nearly 3m so he wrote in to point it out
No money wasted? What about the initial transfer fees? By all accounts we paid at least £2.5m for Tomlin and Bogle, two of only three players we paid cash for over the summer. That is money wasted as they're no longer at the club to help us with the promotion push. We've also had to spend at least another £2m on bringing in another striker.
Another post on here said Tomlin wanted to be closer to home due to current circumstances. Not sure if that's referring to the aftermath of his court case or not, but if it is then we knew he had issues about moving home when we was at Bristol. We surely also knew there was a court case pending. And why isn't he match fit? He's been with us all season but not been deemed good enough to be in the team. I'm gutted he's gone to Forest, absolutely gutted. Just says to me that Warnock got it wrong.
The Bogle transfer is just as strange as he's gone to a team that isn't even in the League One play-offs. It tells me his level is League One, especially if the likes of Sunderland (who were after Nuhui!), Burton and Bolton even (swap?) didn't come in for him?
Getting rid of Tomlin is criminal.
He at least looked like he knew what to do with the ball to win games, every game he played in he had a great positive influence.
Warnock obviously doesn't like him hence he has been ejected. Shocking decision.
I think that's the last we'll see of Tomlin in a City shirt. Why can Forest get him fit and we can't? The only way to get fit is to play. Warnock obviously doesn't fancy him after seeing him up close.
Warnock always goes on about he has had seven promotions but never mentions his four relegations or his sackings by QPR and Crystal Palace when they were in relegation positions? Pullis saved Palace but QPR went down! I agree however he is a good manager at Championship level and finds good free transfers but his money signings like Malky and Ole have been crap! Glad it’s Tan’s money and not mine!
Do you not know the difference between selling and loaning out a player ?. Tomlin and Bogle are loans i.e. They still belong to us. Therefore their original fees have not been wasted - they go away, play games and get fitter. We may even have recall clauses in the agreements. We will only find out if we have lost money on them when they are actually sold on. There is no doubt in my mind that Bogle has gone out to get games and experience and will come back a better player for us in future. Tomlin is a different story but we need someone like him fully fit now for the run in and havent got five or six games to play him back to fitness - we need a fully fit team now to maintain our challenge.
Funnily enough sunshine, I do, but thanks for the lesson in plain English.
We paid money in transfer fees for them to perform for us this season, not on loan to other teams. As I've said in other posts, I'm gutted Tomlin has gone, but I can't see why we have to send him to a team that may turn into a play-off rival to get him fit.
We shouldnt be worrying about a team in mid table 16 points below us with 18 games to go. We should be looking up, trying to overtake Villa and Derby, which is what Warnock is doing. If Tomlin does well for Forest his value might go up and we can sell him at a profit. Forest will also be paying most if not all of his wages, so we gain in that way as well.
Sadly you may well be right. Annoying as I agree with posters on here who say he had a positive impact when he did come on.
37 years in the game I think Neil Warnock knows what style of player Tomlin is..not like he's replaced him like for like either so looks like he's gone the workhorse approach to "save" our season.