Updated: Guardiola 2 Lampard 1

Guardiola 0 Lampard 1

Nice :biggrin:

Brilliant game so far.
Chelsea have been excellent.

Jorginho is much better under Frank, he's like a different player.

1-1

All square.

So far, only Southampton letting the side down for a clean sweep of away wins in the Premiership today.

2-1 Man Citeh

There are more goals in this game.

Chelsea playing like they are happy losing 2-1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

There are more goals in this game.

---

Thank you Raheem :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Thank you Raheem :biggrin:

---

Or maybe not :facepalm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Or maybe not :facepalm:

---

:hehe: Got any more tips lol?

VAR sure is shite.

Even on the screen frozen he looked on side.
This one didn't matter to the result but there have been and will be ones that will matter.

They have to give the tight ones to the attacker.

Pathetic. Benefit of doubt to the attacker every time.

Attachment 3364

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Morris

Pathetic. Benefit of doubt to the attacker every time.

Attachment 3364

---

I had a tenner on 3-1 to Man City.

A change to the offside rule rather than VAR

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tuerto

I had a tenner on 3-1 to Man City.

---

Devastating.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Morris

Devastating.

---

That's how i lose bets. I don't win, i just get incredibly close.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MacAdder

VAR sure is shite.

Even on the screen frozen he looked on side.
This one didn't matter to the result but there have been and will be ones that will matter.

They have to give the tight ones to the attacker.

---

:thumbup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Morris

Pathetic. Benefit of doubt to the attacker every time.

Attachment 3364

---

I'm looking really closely at that picture and it still looks onside to me. I think it was after the boring 1990 World Cup that FIFA decreed that any benefit of the doubt shown in close offside decisions should go to the attacking side rather than, as was previously the case, the defending team - VAR has completely reversed that position and I'd rather see it shelved than have this sort of farcical decision constantly repeated.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the other bob wilson

I'm looking really closely at that picture and it still looks onside to me. I think it was after the boring 1990 World Cup that FIFA decreed that any benefit of the doubt shown in close offside decisions should go to the attacking side rather than, as was previously the case, the defending team - VAR has completely reversed that position and I'd rather see it shelved than have this sort of farcical decision constantly repeated.

---

His dandruff is offside. I can't stand VAR, although i think that a small portion of blame must go towards the fans (customers) who seem to get very annoyed when things go against their teams but not so when a poor decision goes their way. I'm probably in a minority when i say that it's the beauty of sport (certainly football) that we have contentious decisions and some that are plainly wrong. If people want to moan about a couple of decisions going against them over a season in order to justify their team being relegated and being shit for the most part then in my opinion they're not really dealing with the bigger issue. If we are to have VAR then why not just for semi finals and finals, where a balls up by the officials can be costly and deprive a club and it's fans of success.