Seeing as Cunningham has been horsewhipped for his performances.......Just saying......
Printable View
Seeing as Cunningham has been horsewhipped for his performances.......Just saying......
Agree it's a no contest, Bennett's the better defender & better attacker, we look a lot better balanced with Bennett in the side .:wave:
He probably is, my point is that he had a stinker today-and his defending and positional play really is shit at times? When do our fullbacks attack?Quote:
Originally Posted by Des Parrot
He blocked their best chance of the game with a goal saving block first half.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
Our full backs don’t cross the half way line but that’s not their fault. It’s the way Warnock sets up and besides, weve got no one in midfield to work the ball to get them into positions to attack.
I know that-wasn't blaming them! i don't rate Bennett, gets himself in some horror positions during games and switches off-he's better than Cunningham-it seems-but that's not really that difficult.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
you don't like anyone in our team :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
That's his job, to defend-It's the other aspects of his game that suffer in my opinion, the stuff that should come naturally. I'd rather he stay in position and not switch off for the majority of games rather than the odd bit of brilliance on the goal line.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
At the moment, you're right :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
I meant switch off at times during a game, not the majority of games-that would be harsh and untrue :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
Actually, i like Peltier-He's the only one who doesn't try anything above his station-clever man. And Mendez because he makes me laugh when he tries to control the ball.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
but hes useless at this level, i just couldn't even be bothered to criticise the team that much today because that performance was that bad even dlm couldnt defend what we saw today, sometimes i wonder if nml actually means to kick the ball past defenders to try and run past them or if he just miss controlled it :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuerto
I know, i remember watching him against Sheff Wed last season on Sky. He took his first touch which went about five yards from him, his second hit a defender and came back to him, his third hit his knee, he then ran the ball out of play-me and my boy were pissing ourselves-you could see Grujic thinking 'What the ****'...... :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
He will be on tomorrow defending it. NQAT.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieccfc
And he nearly cost us the game with what was a definite penalty, he was all over the place with the header that went nowhere, by the time he realised what he'd done he was grasping at their player for dear life.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Straying back to the original threadI mean Bennett.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Gillis
It was not a definite penalty at all. The foul was outside the box for starters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Gillis
I thought Manga looked head and shoulders above everyone else yesterday, which wasn't difficult! Even covering in the middle for Morrison who, let's be honest, is being terribly exposed at this level. Manga put in some decent crosses too considering he is playing out of position.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Agreed, According to the rules the infringement started outside the box therefore it should have been a free kick, plus a yellow card.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
If there is a foul on an attacker which starts outside the penalty area and continues inside then a penalty should be awarded. Them's the rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Depends if the foul was given for a trip or holdingQuote:
Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman