4-4-2 or 3-5-2
Could it work or do we need that extra man in midfield?
Printable View
4-4-2 or 3-5-2
Could it work or do we need that extra man in midfield?
Yesterday's lineup is better
Midfield has been our Achilles for years. Yesterday it was perfect. Goes to show we got options on top, but our midfield I key for balance. My humble opinion of course.
4-1-1-1-1-1-1 great spine of a team
thought it was last season formation of 4.3.3.
To be fair, at times during the game, we're all correct. With the ball and without the ball, we were set up in different formations.
It's nice for a change to be able to have an idea of the formation we've gone with, as the previous recent games have been a f**king mystery :hehe:
If our wingers were able to maintain Saturday's standards then I'd be happy with Saturday's line up, but they haven't done all season and I'm afraid an "average" performance by Hoilett, Murphy and Mendez-Laing has been five or six out of ten (often lower as well) as opposed to the seven or eight we saw on Saturday - for much of the time, playing with two wingers just hasn't worked and we've ended up short of bodies through the middle.
Given our dominance over WH, I think we went 4-5-2 and nobody counted :hehe: