-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sgt. Pepper
If it all goes well...
It could be nothing more than that.
While he may have looked like he simply handled it poorly (so far) to some of us reserved Brits, quite possibly it looks like mighty fine stuff to a greater proportion of his own electorate.
Kim Jong-un would need to be on-board surely - in order to mitigate the risk of something super crazy occurring out of misunderstanding or knee-jerk, which would then require a response in turn?
If they are on board I guess NK get some kind of benefit - sanctions lifted or whatever - in lieu of playing nice.
If only chocolate cake could talk. Xi is the regional power broker, so nothing is going down without his involvement in the matter.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
It seems that YouTube ARE in on it, attacking anybody who doesn't support the radical left agenda.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...-a7887576.html
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
For the benefit of anyone who doesn't read the article and takes gulley's comment at face value, the story actually says that some guy is not getting paid for his hate videos about Islam (they haven't been removed).
Interesting that gulley thinks that not hating Islam = radical left.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
For the benefit of anyone who doesn't read the article and takes gulley's comment at face value, the story actually says that some guy is not getting paid for his hate videos about Islam (they haven't been removed).
Interesting that gulley thinks that not hating Islam = radical left.
FYI the algorithms are being turned against anybody who isn't on the Soros train. Even your Google searches are being messed with, along with social media news feeds.
PS I believe in free speach for everybody, and I am totally against the gaming of the system.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
FYI the algorithms are being turned against anybody who isn't on the Soros train. Even your Google searches are being messed with, along with social media news feeds.
PS I believe in free speach for everybody, and I am totally against the gaming of the system.
"Attacking anyone who doesn't support the radical left agenda"
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Trump thanks Putin for expelling the 750+ diplomats from Russia as he thinks it'll save the US money. Asslicking aside, why does he think they've been sacked?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I'm heartbroken a bullshitiing lying hate monger isn't getting paid for telling a load of bollocks which only simple minded fools believe.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CardiffIrish2
I'm heartbroken a bullshitiing lying hate monger isn't getting paid for telling a load of bollocks which only simple minded fools believe.
Like I said above I believe in freedom speach for everybody. The blocking of certain opinions may suit you at the moment, but it may not suit you in the future, or in the futures of your offspring and extended family. Any form of censorship is a slippery slope, especially when it is done indiscriminately by automated algorithms.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Like I said above I believe in freedom speach for everybody. The blocking of certain opinions may suit you at the moment, but it may not suit you in the future, or in the futures of your offspring and extended family. Any form of censorship is a slippery slope, especially when it is done indiscriminately by automated algorithms.
Your example of YouTube attacking anyone not on the radical left was not that at all. Your example didn't even show someone being censored. Whose freedom of speach (sic) are you referring to?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Your example of YouTube attacking anyone not on the radical left was not that at all. Your example didn't even show someone being censored. Whose freedom of speach (sic) are you referring to?
Hundreds of YouTube channels have already disappeared.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Hundreds of YouTube channels have already disappeared.
Is it only radical left channels remaining?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Is it only radical left channels remaining?
Certain agendas are more acceptable than others. We are not very far into this new development, so it is still very fluid. It all came about off the back of the left-inspired Russian hackers and fake news narratives.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Yes, certain agendas are acceptable.
You are saying that the only channels currently on YouTube are those on the radical left?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Like I said above I believe in freedom speach for everybody. The blocking of certain opinions may suit you at the moment, but it may not suit you in the future, or in the futures of your offspring and extended family. Any form of censorship is a slippery slope, especially when it is done indiscriminately by automated algorithms.
As Lardy said and as I checked out loads and loads of his videos are still on YouTube and he's playing the martyr.
Personally it's funny watching them as he's completely full of shit and I haven't made any reference to blocking his opinions.
He's perturbed as he's lost money through no advertising which says it all and that alone is the main reason why he creates his crappy recordings.
He's neutral about Donald Trump too by the sounds 😃😃
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CardiffIrish2
As Lardy said and as I checked out loads and loads of his videos are still on YouTube and he's playing the martyr.
Personally it's funny watching them as he's completely full of shit and I haven't made any reference to blocking his opinions.
He's perturbed as he's lost money through no advertising which says it all and that alone is the main reason why he creates his crappy recordings.
He's neutral about Donald Trump too by the sounds ����
Bingo, this is where the fake news started. People realised that you could get startling hits by saying outrageous things about huge news stories, and nothing was bigger than the US election.
Although that's probably what the radical left globalists want me to think...
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Bingo, this is where the fake news started. People realised that you could get startling hits by saying outrageous things about huge news stories, and nothing was bigger than the US election.
Although that's probably what the radical left globalists want me to think...
I think the MSM had the fake news market cornered a long time ago :biggrin:
BTW could you give me some examples of the outrageous things that were said?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
The fiery and furious words in the USA v. North Korea ping pong show took a new twist today when China joined the fray. In short, through an approved news agency, they told Trump (and everyone else) that should the US launch a first-strike attack on North Korea then it would mean war with China.
CHINA WOULD JOIN FORCES WITH NORTH KOREA IF U.S. LAUNCHES PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE - http://www.newsweek.com/china-north-...-strike-649802
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I think the MSM had the fake news market cornered a long time ago :biggrin:
BTW could you give me some examples of the outrageous things that were said?
Trump's wee.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
The fiery and furious words in the USA v. North Korea ping pong show took a new twist today when China joined the fray. In short, through an approved news agency, they told Trump (and everyone else) that should the US launch a first-strike attack on North Korea then it would mean war with China.
CHINA WOULD JOIN FORCES WITH NORTH KOREA IF U.S. LAUNCHES PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE -
http://www.newsweek.com/china-north-...-strike-649802
Check mate.
Anything beyond that and we are all drawn in.
I never thought I'd actually see a nuclear cock-fight, with the planet as the ultimate prize, in my lifetime.
It takes two very special kinda guys to do this to the rest of us.
Of course the ITK crew know I'm being naive - arf -arf.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Sgt. Pepper
Check mate.
Anything beyond that and we are all drawn in.
I never thought I'd actually see a nuclear cock-fight, with the planet as the ultimate prize, in my lifetime.
It takes two very special kinda guys to do this to the rest of us.
Of course the ITK crew know I'm being naive - arf -arf.
It's all Trump's fault for bullying Kim Jong Un.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Trump's wee.
The golden showers? I thought it really was fake?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
The golden showers? I thought it really was fake?
The conversation was about fake news, in case you missed that.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Groups Trump has singled out and vociferously condemned:
1. Muslims from certain countries
2. Transgenders in the military
3. Women he doesn't find sexy
4. Journalists
5. Congress
6. Mexicans
7. FBI and other US intelligence agencies
8. US courts
Groups he's careful not to offend too much.
1. White supremacists / neo-nazis
2. Russians
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Groups Trump has singled out and vociferously condemned:
1. Muslims from certain countries
2. Transgenders in the military
3. Women he doesn't find sexy
4. Journalists
5. Congress
6. Mexicans
7. FBI and other US intelligence agencies
8. US courts
Groups he's careful not to offend too much.
1. White supremacists / neo-nazis
2. Russians
:hehe:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
The conversation was about fake news, in case you missed that.
I asked for an example of what is fake. Are you saying the pee-pee dossier was fake or is it real?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Yet again the collosal prick gets it wrong with his pathetic comment on the incident in Charlottesville yesterday.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I asked for an example of what is fake. Are you saying the pee-pee dossier was fake or is it real?
I thought this might throw you. Give you a clue, not everyone is completely partisan.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
I think the scores are about even, terrorist deaths/wounded by Muslim extremists and by the the far right in USA in 2017. One has the protection of the president though so I am certain Trump and his boys will go on to win it in extra time.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
I thought this might throw you. Give you a clue, not everyone is completely partisan.
I genuinely don't know what you are trying to say. I just asked what in your mind is fake and what is real. I'm not partisan at all, I am just an observer the same as you.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I genuinely don't know what you are trying to say. I just asked what in your mind is fake and what is real. I'm not partisan at all, I am just an observer the same as you.
I answered the question.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
I answered the question.
Ok, just to be clear, did pissgate really happen or is it made-up BS?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CardiffIrish2
Yet again the collosal prick gets it wrong with his pathetic comment on the incident in Charlottesville yesterday.
His comments have so far brought us closer to nuclear war and condoned Nazis in the streets and he's not even done a year yet.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
His comments have so far brought us closer to nuclear war and condoned Nazis in the streets and he's not even done a year yet.
Have you got a link to where he condoned the Nazis? And also some proof (besides the stormtrooper helmets) that they were Nazis and not agent provocateurs. Thanks mate.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Have you got a link to where he condoned the Nazis? And also some proof (besides the stormtrooper helmets) that they were Nazis and not agent provocateurs. Thanks mate.
It's great that you're now a sticker for clarity and transparency before accepting something. That wasn't the case for the Clinton Enterprise's decades-long stranglehold on politics, media and the legal world, or North Korea being China's puppet, or that people on the left want to make paedophilia acceptable, or the same people on the left pushing an open borders agenda by somehow putting words into the mouth of Trump's political adviser, or that YouTube and Twitter are trying to control the minds of the majority (despite their unmoderated user comments showing a massive spectrum of opinion) - and that's just the last few pages of this thread. All of a sudden making inferences is not good enough...
To answer your questions.
Trump has never been shy about being speaking clearly about subjects. This time he made a clear refusal to specifically condemn the white supremacists and refused to say he didn't want their support. Plenty of other senators, governors, etc have clearly condemned them. Trump hasn't. If you're not condemning this, you're condoning it.
Are they paid actors? I don't know them personally so I cannot say. But their identities are being made known over social media and we will no doubt find out soon enough. But if you have spent time in the Deep South or spoken to anyone from there about attitudes, you'd know there's no need to pay people to act like this.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
It's great that you're now a sticker for clarity and transparency before accepting something. That wasn't the case for the Clinton Enterprise's decades-long stranglehold on politics, media and the legal world, or North Korea being China's puppet, or that people on the left want to make paedophilia acceptable, or the same people on the left pushing an open borders agenda by somehow putting words into the mouth of Trump's political adviser, or that YouTube and Twitter are trying to control the minds of the majority (despite their unmoderated user comments showing a massive spectrum of opinion) - and that's just the last few pages of this thread. All of a sudden making inferences is not good enough...
To answer your questions.
Trump has never been shy about being speaking clearly about subjects. This time he made a clear refusal to specifically condemn the white supremacists and refused to say he didn't want their support. Plenty of other senators, governors, etc have clearly condemned them. Trump hasn't. If you're not condemning this, you're condoning it.
Are they paid actors? I don't know them personally so I cannot say. But their identities are being made known over social media and we will no doubt find out soon enough. But if you have spent time in the Deep South or spoken to anyone from there about attitudes, you'd know there's no need to pay people to act like this.
I am just trying to form an unbiased opinion, and the only information I have so far is coming from you. Do you have an outline of the policing strategy that was in play yesterday? Were both groups policed sufficiently and fairly?
Regarding Clinton, I never really paid much attention to her before. I only became aware of the progressive agenda after researching Brexit, and Soros's name kept popping up in all kinds of globalist subterfuge, which all seemed to be connected to the Democrats in some way.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
I am just trying to form an unbiased opinion, and the only information I have so far is coming from you. Do you have an outline of the policing strategy that was in play yesterday? Were both groups policed sufficiently and fairly?
Regarding Clinton, I never really paid much attention to her before. I only became aware of the progressive agenda after researching Brexit, and Soros's name kept popping up in all kinds of globalist subterfuge, which all seemed to be connected to the Democrats in some way.
"The only information I have so far is coming from you"
It's leading global news mate.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
"The only information I have so far is coming from you"
It's leading global news mate.
The MSM is a secondary source of news for me, as they are no doubt at the forefront of pushing the narrative that you succinctly repeated above, Trump is a Nazi, etc. We all know the modus operandi by now as it has been used countless times already.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
The MSM is a secondary source of news for me, as they are no doubt at the forefront of pushing the narrative that you succinctly repeated above, Trump is a Nazi, etc. We all know the modus operandi by now as it has been used countless times already.
You can't hide behind this every time, mate, it's not a get out of jail free card to use when the conversation is going badly. This is no secondary source, it's Trump's own words.
Have I called Trump a Nazi? No.
The facts are that when a vehicle was driven into innocent people in another country (London) Trump was on the attack in no time. When it happened in his own country, but this time by white supremacists, his response was very muted.
In the words of one senator (a democrat if you want to dismiss it) "it's not too much to ask to have a president who explicitly condemns nazis"
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
You can't hide behind this every time, mate, it's not a get out of jail free card to use when the conversation is going badly. This is no secondary source, it's Trump's own words.
Have I called Trump a Nazi? No.
The facts are that when a vehicle was driven into innocent people in another country (London) Trump was on the attack in no time. When it happened in his own country, but this time by white supremacists, his response was very muted.
In the words of one senator (a democrat if you want to dismiss it) "it's not too much to ask to have a president who explicitly condemns nazis"
I see the new FBI director and the DOJ have started a federal enquiry into the events in Charlottesville, so hopefully all the stories will match up and they will get to the bottom of what happened.
All I know is that a permit was issued for the initial protest, and then the Antifa mob showed up without permission, with most of them being bussed in from out of town.