Reply With Quote- Sir Alex FergusonOriginally Posted by Cardiff Irish wrote on Fri, 02 January 2015 12:45
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
http://fanchants.co.uk/football-songs/liverpool-chants/best- midfield-world-lfc/Gerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.
No bias there mate......
Really ? I've never denied not liking Liverpool but Paul Scholes played alongside Roy Keane, Gerrard played alongside Ivor BiscanAnd Xabi Alonso
- Sir Alex Ferguson
The best thing England ever did was abuse the talent they had in Scholes. God forbid they might have won something otherwise and there would be mass suicides in Wales.
Scholes was class fair play no argument from me about that, wish he'd played for Ireland though as his parents were from the Old countryGerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.
FYPGerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.Neither Gerrard nor Lampard are in the same class as Scholes because Scholes has everything they don't.
Gerrard 144 times ( runs around a lot, lots of effort ,has some skill,terrible accent )Gerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.
Feck off with that ginger hair where else could his lineage be from ? -DGerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.Neither Gerrard nor Lampard are in the same class as Scholes because Scholes has everything they don't.Gerrard was never a prolific goal scorer but could control a game. Lampard scored for fun but never ran the show. Scholes did both but unlike Gerrard didn't rely on spectacular 100000 yard balls. Scholes did everything so well he made it look easy so never caught the eye a la Gerrard.
Gerrard has been great for his club down the years but like so many of England's golden generation didn't do it on the international stage. Lampard for me. His sheer ability to score goals from midfield has been incredible.
i was a gingerGerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.Neither Gerrard nor Lampard are in the same class as Scholes because Scholes has everything they don't.Gerrard was never a prolific goal scorer but could control a game. Lampard scored for fun but never ran the show. Scholes did both but unlike Gerrard didn't rely on spectacular 100000 yard balls. Scholes did everything so well he made it look easy so never caught the eye a la Gerrard.Also Lampard and Scholes were model professionals and Gerrard us just a rich scouser, so devoid in class and one generation removed from tinker.
Packerman. How many fingers have you got and were you in the film Deliverance?Gerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.Neither Gerrard nor Lampard are in the same class as Scholes because Scholes has everything they don't.Gerrard was never a prolific goal scorer but could control a game. Lampard scored for fun but never ran the show. Scholes did both but unlike Gerrard didn't rely on spectacular 100000 yard balls. Scholes did everything so well he made it look easy so never caught the eye a la Gerrard.Also Lampard and Scholes were model professionals and Gerrard us just a rich scouser, so devoid in class and one generation removed from tinker.The best thing England ever did was abuse the talent they had in Scholes. God forbid they might have won something otherwise and there would be mass suicides in Wales.Scholes was class fair play no argument from me about that, wish he'd played for Ireland though as his parents flew over Old country once on their way to the USA
Wouldn't get near Ali.Gerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.
Ok fair enough I should have been more prominent with my admiration for Scholes who is afantastic player, point takenGerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.
I,M NOT FROM NORFOLKGerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.Neither Gerrard nor Lampard are in the same class as Scholes because Scholes has everything they don't.Gerrard was never a prolific goal scorer but could control a game. Lampard scored for fun but never ran the show. Scholes did both but unlike Gerrard didn't rely on spectacular 100000 yard balls. Scholes did everything so well he made it look easy so never caught the eye a la Gerrard.Also Lampard and Scholes were model professionals and Gerrard us just a rich scouser, so devoid in class and one generation removed from tinker.The best thing England ever did was abuse the talent they had in Scholes. God forbid they might have won something otherwise and there would be mass suicides in Wales.Scholes was class fair play no argument from me about that, wish he'd played for Ireland though as his parents flew over Old country once on their way to the USAFYP
Had to laugh at some comments from so called experts, saying he's Liverpools best ever player. He wouldn't have got into Liverpools team of the 70s and 80s. For me, Souness, McDermott and Ray Kennedy pisses all over him as midfielders. Gerrard was a very good player, but his trophy return for his club was poor and for his country was non existent. Can't think of any England games where he stamped his authority on a game. Great player, but totally over rated.
Gerrard the better player. Scholes and Lampard great players but were lucky to have more great players around them. Gerrard would have walked into either Man Utd or Chelsea's first team.Neither Gerrard nor Lampard are in the same class as Scholes because Scholes has everything they don't.Gerrard was never a prolific goal scorer but could control a game. Lampard scored for fun but never ran the show. Scholes did both but unlike Gerrard didn't rely on spectacular 100000 yard balls. Scholes did everything so well he made it look easy so never caught the eye a la Gerrard.Also Lampard and Scholes were model professionals and Gerrard us just a rich scouser, so devoid in class and one generation removed from tinker.The best thing England ever did was abuse the talent they had in Scholes. God forbid they might have won something otherwise and there would be mass suicides in Wales.Scholes was class fair play no argument from me about that, wish he'd played for Ireland though as his parents flew over Old country once on their way to the USAFYP
Ill give you one guess at the only English player to get into Pirlo's Champions League 11? And its not Lampard or Gerrard
Is it Jay Bothroyd?
No, FFS that's Joe Hart!
In 1. Fair playIll give you one guess at the only English player to get into Pirlo's Champions League 11? And its not Lampard or Gerrard
Posting Permissions