Reply With QuoteLinkyOriginally Posted by WJ99mobile wrote on Sun, 04 January 2015 15:37
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I rented when I was younger, it was no issueOne interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest only
Linky
It costs what the money lenders want it to cost, working hand-in-hand with other 'interested parties.'One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest onlyI'm not sure why you think rents would be reduced? The competition to buy from a shortage of housing stock is still very much present, but is just skewed heavily in favour of landlords. Have I missed something?If there is more rental accommodation available, then you would expect lower rents than if there were fewer rental units available.
If that's all you think then I take it that you couldn't give a rat's arse.One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest onlyI'm not sure why you think rents would be reduced? The competition to buy from a shortage of housing stock is still very much present, but is just skewed heavily in favour of landlords. Have I missed something?
You miss the point. You argue that renting is unfair because the fruits of your toils aren't yours and cannot be passed on to your children. I suggest that thatcher was instrumental in making this happen for millions - she was and it was the right thing to do.One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest onlyI'm not sure why you think rents would be reduced? The competition to buy from a shortage of housing stock is still very much present, but is just skewed heavily in favour of landlords. Have I missed something?If there is more rental accommodation available, then you would expect lower rents than if there were fewer rental units available.
Hypocritical or what ?One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest only
Slight difference, Michael. How is it hypocritical?One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest only
I never said he shouldn't rent, I said with his film star salary he really shouldn't be in social housing - he could afford to live elsewhere thus freeing up much needed social housing for those that really needed itOne interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest only
One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest onlyI'm not sure why you think rents would be reduced? The competition to buy from a shortage of housing stock is still very much present, but is just skewed heavily in favour of landlords. Have I missed something?
You don't have to live with yours, you do still have the right to do what you want.. for nowOne interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Germany doesn't really gave a homebuyer market with most Germans renting. The rental market is very strong and provides great flexibility allowing the younger generation to move around freelyYou scare me feedback.
Simple - why not vote for the political party that only allows 1 house ownership per person - and out right bans any company from stock piling houses - by taxing them out of existence.
If such a policy was what the people wanted then there will be a political party about to announce this - surely
Where did I say he should buy it?One interesting thing about the housing market is that house building is usually higher in areas where there are generally more people renting. It's important to note that in terms of affordability just building homes is the best thing that you can do.No question that just building homes is the answer - but it isn't going to happen in the short/medium term.In the meantime the buy-to-let market is benefiting from some serious advantages over the buy-to-occupy market. Interest free mortgages, offsetting mortgage interest against tax for example - available to the landlord, but not the owner occupier. This inevitably skews the market and pushes both rental and purchase prices skyward.Perhaps it is time to recognise that the property-owning democracy dream is fading, and to address the lack of protection/tenancy rights currently afforded to tenants in the UK. Germany is usually mentioned at this point ....Reduces rents surely? I don't think there are any interest free mortgages available are there?I agree thought that tenancy rights are an issue, I actually think a healthy rental market is really beneficial to both the economy and people's ability to live in a home that best suits their needs.OOps! I meant interest onlyI'm not sure why you think rents would be reduced? The competition to buy from a shortage of housing stock is still very much present, but is just skewed heavily in favour of landlords. Have I missed something?If there is more rental accommodation available, then you would expect lower rents than if there were fewer rental units available.
Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.
Don't you be collecting any rain water mind, it does not belong to you.
Should people build houses for others for free?
I am talking about fleecing people through exploitationFood and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.
Here's a cute video of a kitten who really, really wants to playFood and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSHFtiqqqrUFood and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?
Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?Here's a cute video of a kitten who really, really wants to play
Are you suggesting that people that build houses are exploring people?Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?I am talking about fleecing people through exploitation
Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?I am talking about fleecing people through exploitation
Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?I am talking about fleecing people through exploitation
Sorry to upset you.Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?I am talking about fleecing people through exploitationAre you suggesting that people that build houses are exploring people?
Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?I am talking about fleecing people through exploitationAre you suggesting that people that build houses are exploring people?
Food and shelter are basic human rights. You can tell a lot about people who aim to profit from it.Should people build houses for others for free?I am talking about fleecing people through exploitationAre you suggesting that people that build houses are exploring people?
Posting Permissions
