Reply With QuoteDidn't realise your were a Daily Mail reader.Originally Posted by BLUETIT wrote on Sun, 04 January 2015 23:01
She better not go driving through any tunnels.
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Two humourous posts from TJ in 24 hours. Must be some kind of record!She better not go driving through any tunnels.
Didn't realise your were a Daily Mail reader.She better not go driving through any tunnels.
good enough for rolf its good enough for the royal ponces
randy andy and the koo key
Good enough for Lord Porchesters bastard son, google it peeps
I'd never heard that one.
They were able to control the press , still are to a degree but they are fecked with social media.
I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.
Where is your evidence for these allegations?
No allegations, just my mind wandering on a bored monday. And do you think any evidence would exist if it was real? Hell no!I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.
If it's real, there must be evidence. If there is no evidence, then speculation is pointless.I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Where is your evidence for these allegations?
PS It maybe just a coincidence but .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EpsteinTargeting a Royal and a Prime Minister .. there are bound to be some conspiracy theories popping up over this. Who would want to do a thing like that?What do you mean?
What's the coincidence?Targeting a Royal and a Prime Minister .. there are bound to be some conspiracy theories popping up over this. Who would want to do a thing like that?What do you mean?
Epstein only got 13 months for a crime that carried a sentence of 20 years. Friends in high places or scared punters? Also his phone book is available online and shows he was in contact with Clinton, Blair, Mandelson and a host of other big political names. Taking into account the use of cameras in every room (for evidence?) it starts looking like the work of an intel agency
I never said there was any point in my post. I only wrote it in jest, I dont really think it happened, its just one of those things my mind put together. Sometimes things just fit together for no reason.I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Where is your evidence for these allegations?No allegations, just my mind wandering on a bored monday. And do you think any evidence would exist if it was real? Hell no!
Highlighted for you.Targeting a Royal and a Prime Minister .. there are bound to be some conspiracy theories popping up over this. Who would want to do a thing like that?What do you mean?Epstein only got 13 months for a crime that carried a sentence of 20 years. Friends in high places or scared punters? Also his phone book is available online and shows he was in contact with Clinton, Blair, Mandelson and a host of other big political names. Taking into account the use of cameras in every room (for evidence?) it starts looking like the work of an intel agency
Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.
He's a jew - they're bastards who control loads of stuff.Targeting a Royal and a Prime Minister .. there are bound to be some conspiracy theories popping up over this. Who would want to do a thing like that?What do you mean?Epstein only got 13 months for a crime that carried a sentence of 20 years. Friends in high places or scared punters? Also his phone book is available online and shows he was in contact with Clinton, Blair, Mandelson and a host of other big political names. Taking into account the use of cameras in every room (for evidence?) it starts looking like the work of an intel agency
Perhaps these things are true but, if they are, they must have been discovered through evidence. I was just wondering what that evidence is. I wasn't disputing any of the allegations.I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Where is your evidence for these allegations?No allegations, just my mind wandering on a bored monday. And do you think any evidence would exist if it was real? Hell no!If it's real, there must be evidence. If there is no evidence, then speculation is pointless.
in his defence, he is a properly brave bloke.
In the Falklands when OUR Welsh lads had been blown up on the Galahad he flew his helicopter dangerously close to the burning ship to use the rotors as a way of fanning the flames and smoke away from the escaping Welsh Guards.
Nobody could say what would explode next, and one thing about war is that the ammunition tends to be live, and anything could have gone up and taken him out of the sky.
At the time even Vietnam chopper vets were calling it "heroic bordering on plain crazy"
So for me, unless someone brings out conclusive evidence he has done something wrong, i'm giving him the benefit of the doubt he deserves.
It is interesting who the go-betweens were for the above women. Cliff Richard met Jill Dando on numerous occasions just before her death, and Prince Charles used Jimmy Savile to liaise with Diana after their breakup. Were they on fishing expeditions, since they had the trust of the dearly departed?I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.
Yeah I know what you are saying, I have been following these stories for the last 2 years, that wasn't really my point, my point was that people are quite happy to say stuff on here when it suits them even if it is "in jest" but on a different day of the week they would slag someone off or call them a loon for even suggesting such a thing.I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.
You say things like that alot more often, thats why you get called a loon by some on here. Although if I am honest I see you calling yourself a loon alot more than I see people calling you a loon. I think that may have something to do with it.I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.It is interesting who the go-betweens were for the above women. Cliff Richard met Jill Dando on numerous occasions just before her death, and Prince Charles used Jimmy Savile to liaise with Diana after their breakup. Were they on fishing expeditions, since they had the trust of the dearly departed?
So that theory of yours randomly came from nowhere did it?I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.It is interesting who the go-betweens were for the above women. Cliff Richard met Jill Dando on numerous occasions just before her death, and Prince Charles used Jimmy Savile to liaise with Diana after their breakup. Were they on fishing expeditions, since they had the trust of the dearly departed?Yeah I know what you are saying, I have been following these stories for the last 2 years, that wasn't really my point, my point was that people are quite happy to say stuff on here when it suits them even if it is "in jest" but on a different day of the week they would slag someone off or call them a loon for even suggesting such a thing.
I think Barry Dragon has got his finger on the pulse, and he is now using plausible deniability as a defenceI think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.It is interesting who the go-betweens were for the above women. Cliff Richard met Jill Dando on numerous occasions just before her death, and Prince Charles used Jimmy Savile to liaise with Diana after their breakup. Were they on fishing expeditions, since they had the trust of the dearly departed?Yeah I know what you are saying, I have been following these stories for the last 2 years, that wasn't really my point, my point was that people are quite happy to say stuff on here when it suits them even if it is "in jest" but on a different day of the week they would slag someone off or call them a loon for even suggesting such a thing.What I said is completely ridiculous Mrs R. A figment of my imagination no more.
You reckon?I think he is guilty, he is part of this so-called important people paedo ring. He is the reason Jill Dando was knocked off and Princess Diana knew about it and she was going to reveal it, and she was knocked off. That MI5 employee that was found locked up in a suitcase knew about it so he was knocked off. I think all hell is going to break loose once this comes out.Wow, I can only imagine the amount of grief I would have got for saying that.It is interesting who the go-betweens were for the above women. Cliff Richard met Jill Dando on numerous occasions just before her death, and Prince Charles used Jimmy Savile to liaise with Diana after their breakup. Were they on fishing expeditions, since they had the trust of the dearly departed?Yeah I know what you are saying, I have been following these stories for the last 2 years, that wasn't really my point, my point was that people are quite happy to say stuff on here when it suits them even if it is "in jest" but on a different day of the week they would slag someone off or call them a loon for even suggesting such a thing.What I said is completely ridiculous Mrs R. A figment of my imagination no more.You say things like that alot more often, thats why you get called a loon by some on here. Although if I am honest I see you calling yourself a loon alot more than I see people calling you a loon. I think that may have something to do with it.
Posting Permissions
