I don't understand how any supporter of Thatcher can back her on that - or accept Cameron's attempts to keep it secret.Originally Posted by jackrabbit wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 09:47
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Wonderful generalisationOriginally Posted by Gluey wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 15:38
I don't understand how any supporter of Thatcher can back her on that - or accept Cameron's attempts to keep it secret.Originally Posted by jackrabbit wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 09:47
Her and her mate Ronnie set in motion the events that would make both countries the most indebted nations in the history of mankind. Coincidence?Originally Posted by GRUMPYS DEN wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 15:47
He rolls them out one after the other!!!!Originally Posted by Gluey wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 15:57
Tough choice down west obviously.Originally Posted by calonlan wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 09:53
Hell yes! Questions by the truck load.Originally Posted by jon1959 wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 15:55
It's a fact that Reaganomics were a disaster, as shown by the unpayable debt racked up by both countries.Originally Posted by GRUMPYS DEN wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 16:38
And there was I thinking it was all down to the bankers!! I wonder where Greece,Spain,Portugal and Ireland lie in your list of indebted nations if USA and UK are one and two.Originally Posted by Gluey wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 17:06
Smith was the Labour Mayor of Rochdale at the time. Do you seriously think Maggie would put herself out for him?Originally Posted by calonlan wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 09:53
She was Prime Minister, as such she would be privy to security information on all sorts of people. It is a matter of indisputable public record that she was warned on five separate occasions about her determination to make Jimmy Savile a Knight. Five times her advisors brought to her attention his sexual exploits and attitudes. He was a guest of hers for ten Christmases at Chequers.Originally Posted by jackrabbit wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 21:01
Quite a lot of evidence that her father used to molest the young girls who worked in his shop.
Where is this evidence?Originally Posted by BlooDevil wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 21:54
We can only wonder - what web did he spin that saved him from simply being swatted?Originally Posted by jackrabbit wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 21:01
I remember a lot of people would have done anything for a Jim'll Fix It badge...
Looking around the net today it seems she was warned about Saville not because of any abuse but because he was by his own admission promiscuous and it was thought that it would send out the wrong message if a man with such a lifestyle was honoured at a time when concern about Aids was so widespread.Originally Posted by The sheep report wrote on Mon, 09 March 2015 21:21
is true.Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 01:53
What is the source of this? Are you saying that MI5 didn't have tabs on some weird fella who was all over the Prime Minister?Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 01:53
And the committee's secretary said, in another letter, that Smith had been given the "benefit of the doubt" because he had not been prosecuted."Originally Posted by the other bob wilson wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 06:12
Hilarious all this pontificating by Labour Party supporters-clearly their party is squeaky clean-wait a minute though!!It's about time everyone realised the two main parties are one as bad as the other if you look at recent history.Forget the gutter sniping and get on with the election on present day issues which is far more relevant to what happened in 1988.Originally Posted by Gluey wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 07:35
It's nothing to do with party politics.Originally Posted by GRUMPYS DEN wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 09:17
I'm certainly not voting Labour so back to the drawing board for you.Originally Posted by GRUMPYS DEN wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 09:17
All paedophile apologists are sickening in my opinion whatever their belief system may be. I don't see any way that it can be justified.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100261439/the-ha rriet-harman-paedophilia-scandal-is-a-disaster-of-labours-ow n-making/
"A memorandum unearthed from the archives of the National Council for Civil Liberties show shows that [Patricia] Hewitt told a committee of campaigners including a man later convicted as a sex offender that a legal department headed by Harriet Harman would look at cases of sex between adults and children aged 14 to 16."
Im staggered at the response in this thread.
Are Tories guilty of covering up heinous crimes? Of course they are. Is Thatcher guilty? It seems so. Was Jimmy Savile guilty? Again it seems so despite there never being a case brought against him. Was Cyril Smith (a LibDem) guilty? It certainly seems so.
Three names above, all dead.
Now it might be a good idea for Labour supporters to focus on the past - ignoring the fact that they too were in power when Savile was alive - but its the present that is of most concern to me.
Harriet Harmon is the deputy leader of the Labour Party. She drove through new rules insisting that the leader of deputy leader must always be a woman - irrespective of talent. She was the prime mover in the sunset clause driving women-only shortlists. she has a skewed and sexist ideological agenda that is not shared by most people in this country.
She actually looked at the idea of sex between men and children and as a legal officer was responsible for protecting the 'rights' of PIE as a member of the NCCL.
This woman would stand in as Prime Minister in Milibands absence - like Prescott once did. If Miliband died in office she would be Prime Minister until such time as an election was held.
Say what you like about Cameron, Clegg or even Miliband they are all equally bad in their own way but the Labour Party has three ex-paedophile supporters in its heirarchy and that makes them quite unelectable in my eyes.
It took quite a while before Harmon even said sorry.
thats not right is it?
Moron.Originally Posted by The Penguin wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 10:10
Really?Only when it suits!!!Originally Posted by calonlan wrote on Tue, 10 March 2015 09:30