| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
We repeatedly hear all parties say they understand the need to build more homes and this has been going on for years but neither the conservatives nor labour have ever really got to grips with this issue, freed up planning to allow home building on brownfield sites at a rate the UK needs.Originally Posted by gnasher wrote on Sun, 19 April 2015 16:12
All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.Listen to tory boy. I'm giving a columnists view of a ridiculous conservative policy, nothing more nothing less.
why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.
Non partisan would be a better description.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.
But partisan-as-feck would be a more accurate one.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.Shhhosh. He dos'nt want to talk about the article, he's non political.
Let's just nip this in the bud here and now and say that everything you ever write on these forums is correct and your opinion has been arrived at from considered rational thinking.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.Shhhosh. He dos'nt want to talk about the article, he's non political.
Wibble.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.Listen to tory boy. I'm giving a columnists view of a ridiculous conservative policy, nothing more nothing less.The same poster who floods threads on any given topic asking posters their credentials to comment on certain issues when on one thread admitting to not ever having discussing working conditions with anyone on zero hours contracts. Smash the state feedy? My arse.
All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.Listen to tory boy. I'm giving a columnists view of a ridiculous conservative policy, nothing more nothing less.The same poster who floods threads on any given topic asking posters their credentials to comment on certain issues when on one thread admitting to not ever having discussing working conditions with anyone on zero hours contracts. Smash the state feedy? My arse.
It is not a case of giving the Telegraph credibility, it is a case of pointing out that even the Tories staunchest supporters are having difficulty supporting this dogs breakfast of a policy.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.
Obviously you have a differing opinion so let's leave it there.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.
it actually doesn't get much easier to understandAll of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.
What gives this article any credibility that previous articles were missing (other than it mirrors your opinion).All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.It is very simple.
You continue to miss the point thats been explained quite plainly several times overAll of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.It is very simple.The Telegraph are champions of the Conservative party and often distort reality in order to win over support for the Tories.
let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.It is very simple.The Telegraph are champions of the Conservative party and often distort reality in order to win over support for the Tories.However, in this case even the Telegraph think the policy is bonkers.
A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.
(PS - your 'facts' above are not facts - they are still just opinions!)All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.It is very simple.The Telegraph are champions of the Conservative party and often distort reality in order to win over support for the Tories.However, in this case even the Telegraph think the policy is bonkers.It is not a case of giving the Telegraph credibility, it is a case of pointing out that even the Tories staunchest supporters are having difficulty supporting this dogs breakfast of a policy.
if the article isn't credible why is it being used as evidence to support an opinion?No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.
As for your other statement, I am not arguing about the policy as feedback would have done I am commenting on the position being adopted. It would appear that this article is acceptable because it agrees with your viewpoint.All of a sudden the times and Telegraph are now credible sources.Some posters on this forum are a case in study of myopic politics.It isn't really about whether anyone considers them credible or not. The telegraph is a cheerleader for the Tory party and even they can't find anything positive to write about this policy.why would someone use an article from a newspaper they say has no credibility to augment their arguments? It's a little absurd to use a source you claim has no credibility to give your argument credibility.It is very simple.The Telegraph are champions of the Conservative party and often distort reality in order to win over support for the Tories.However, in this case even the Telegraph think the policy is bonkers.It is not a case of giving the Telegraph credibility, it is a case of pointing out that even the Tories staunchest supporters are having difficulty supporting this dogs breakfast of a policy.I still can't see how someone can cite a source they don't find credible, no matter how you dress it up.
it is not, as you well knowNo I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.
Of course its being used by evidence. Several posters, yourself included, have dismissed the policy as bonkers and have suggested that even Tories find it bonkers using this article as justification for that statement.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.
Fair play, you can be a tedious **** on times.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.
For regurgitating what you have written? Fine. And with language like that I suggest we agree to disagree and bid you farewell.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.if the article isn't credible why is it being used as evidence to support an opinion?
Yes, you can drive the most civilised of us to swearing with your child like trolling.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.if the article isn't credible why is it being used as evidence to support an opinion?it is not, as you well know
Having a difference of opinion or asking questions about reasons why is not and never will be trolling.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.if the article isn't credible why is it being used as evidence to support an opinion?it is not, as you well knowOf course its being used by evidence. Several posters, yourself included, have dismissed the policy as bonkers and have suggested that even Tories find it bonkers using this article as justification for that statement.
In Archie's world having a different opinion to his on this message board constitutes trolling. And he is not alone in displaying such an attitude.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.if the article isn't credible why is it being used as evidence to support an opinion?it is not, as you well knowOf course its being used by evidence. Several posters, yourself included, have dismissed the policy as bonkers and have suggested that even Tories find it bonkers using this article as justification for that statement.Fair play, you can be a tedious **** on times.
Deliberatley misquoting people and attributing to them positions they have made very clear they do not hold - and continually repeating the lie even though you know fully well you are talking bollocks yourself is classic troll behaviour.No I've not. This sudden acceptance that the times and Telegraph print articles worthy of support by those left of centre is akin to suddenly listening to the drunk in the corner of the tap room when you've always dismissed his alcohol fuelled rants.it comes across as if You're happy to support a newspaper when it writes what you want to read.let's leave it there as we clearly differ on this point.A grand total of zero people have said that the Telegraph article is credible.if the article isn't credible why is it being used as evidence to support an opinion?it is not, as you well knowOf course its being used by evidence. Several posters, yourself included, have dismissed the policy as bonkers and have suggested that even Tories find it bonkers using this article as justification for that statement.Fair play, you can be a tedious **** on times.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote