World War III

[Observer]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

[Packerman]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

your kind, no third world war, simple really, anyway, keep up the good work, i,m out of this thread, i,ve got enough things to worry about which are more pressing and real than your world war

[Packerman]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

ps article 5 was invoked after 9/11 how many years ago, no world war

[chris]

a third world war

an apocalyptic scenario suits nobody, as previously said they would be no winners.

[Observer]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

I never said there would be a World War. I merely pointed out the events that could transpire, which as it turns out have more or less happened as predicted.

[Observer]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

Russia hadn't gone and built bases in Iraq at that time and declared their support for Saddam Hussein, so I think you might agree it is a slightly different scenario.

[goslow]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

Russia has had a base in syria since 1971.

[Observer]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

Adapted in 2015 for the current mission.

[goslow]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

ps article 5 was invoked after 9/11 how many years ago, no world war

But there since 1971.

[Observer]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

ps article 5 was invoked after 9/11 how many years ago, no world war

Russia hadn't gone and built bases in Iraq at that time and declared their support for Saddam Hussein, so I think you might agree it is a slightly different scenario.

I'm not sure why we are still discussing this. You said Russia would never even come to Syria, it was all a fantasy and scaremongering.

[goslow]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

ps article 5 was invoked after 9/11 how many years ago, no world war

Russia hadn't gone and built bases in Iraq at that time and declared their support for Saddam Hussein, so I think you might agree it is a slightly different scenario.

Russia has had a base in syria since 1971.

Did i? I look forward to your link.

[Mrs Steve R]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

ps article 5 was invoked after 9/11 how many years ago, no world war

Russia hadn't gone and built bases in Iraq at that time and declared their support for Saddam Hussein, so I think you might agree it is a slightly different scenario.

Russia has had a base in syria since 1971.

Adapted in 2015 for the current mission.

Multi quoting fvckwits

[Observer]

Multi quoting fvckwits

[goslow]

Has it already started - or at least France bombing Syria; cut the red tape?

No,neither are we anywhere near it.

I presume you are in a position to tell us how the Syrian situation will be solved?

No l'm not,what I'm saying is that it won't lead to a world war.

In that case you haven't got a clue how it will turn out.

neither have you, but you keep banging on about a third world war being imminent,

As soon as Russia got involved, the US made it a priority to get themselves into the picture too. What makes you think there won't be a military outcome if they can't find a political solution?

And I have never used the word imminent, that is something you have made up. I have only talked about the prospects due to ongoing events. Remember when I first mentioned it, we were nowhere near the situation that now exists.

there may well be a military outcome, third world war, no, feel free to bookmark

You still don't say how you have come to that conclusion?

When the topic first came up, I casually mentioned how things had the potential to escalate given the number of interested players involved. At that stage it was basically Assad v the local insurgents. Now all the major external players have become active inside Syria. That is quite a change of position don't you think?

common sense, all the big players know where the boundaries are, no one can win.

never come across anyone as paranoid as you appear to be

You said I was paranoid when I mentioned that Russia and the US could be facing each other inside Syria. Now they are pushing for Article 5. Basically everything I said has come true. What kind of paranoia is that exactly?

ps article 5 was invoked after 9/11 how many years ago, no world war

Russia hadn't gone and built bases in Iraq at that time and declared their support for Saddam Hussein, so I think you might agree it is a slightly different scenario.

Russia has had a base in syria since 1971.

Adapted in 2015 for the current mission.

But there since 1971.

Guilty as charged

[TruBlue]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

Bizarre.

[Owen Wilsons Nose]

WW3 is not imminent because all the major powers are more entwined than any point in our history and the cultural exchange is huge, not to mention our enemies are the same.

[Mrs Steve R]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

^^^10 minutes of truth.^^^

I haven't got my view of the world from RT or the Russian government, they just happen to mention stuff I already knew.

[TruBlue]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

^^^10 minutes of truth.^^^

Russian state TV choosing an author who blames the United States.

What's Russian for Sheeple?

[Mrs Steve R]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

^^^10 minutes of truth.^^^

Russian state TV choosing an author who blames the United States.

Weird coincidence.........

How blatant does it have to get before people wake up to this shit? They will keep you living in fear until you have given up every right you ever had, I despair sometimes, I really do.

[goslow]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

^^^10 minutes of truth.^^^

Russian state TV choosing an author who blames the United States.

Weird coincidence.........

I wasn't expecting you to like it

What rights have you lost?

[Packerman]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

^^^10 minutes of truth.^^^

Russian state TV choosing an author who blames the United States.

Weird coincidence.........

I wasn't expecting you to like it

"Russian state TV" is the new "nothing to hide"

none

[goslow]

It would be if it was a state carry out these atrocities, but its not its some barbaric group of weirdos that hates the world, not a specific country.

We know that, but who is sponsoring them and hence responsible for their actions?

Self funding as far as I can tell.

Ransoms, looting banks, extortion, theft etc etc

They'll be into banking next

Political author Gearoid O Colmain discusses the Paris attacks

https://youtu.be/L7GAbVhjTSw

^^^10 minutes of truth.^^^

Russian state TV choosing an author who blames the United States.

Weird coincidence.........

I wasn't expecting you to like it

"Russian state TV" is the new "nothing to hide"

I can never understand you two. If the British government tell you something you rightly question it, if the Russian government feed you something, you're both like a tramp on chips.

[archibald leitch]

WW3 is not imminent because all the major powers are more entwined than any point in our history and the cultural exchange is huge, not to mention our enemies are the same.

You are assuming that WW3 will be fought between superpowers. Why do you think that?

[Colonel Cærdiffi]

Come on Archie, you've clearly got a point to make, just spit it out.

[Mrs Steve R]

Wasting my breath as always.