Leaked transfer agreement between Spurs and Madrid for Bale

[Zenith]

View it here:

http://as.com/descargables/2016/01/20/f98891d4f78745a4cb1669 a599bbccd8.pdf

[Steve R]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

[Baker]

Hardly groundbreaking.

Still cool to see how it works, though.

[*** G L O V E S ***]

Should United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

[Peajay]

Should United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

[Arfur Europe]

Should United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

I'd be gutted if Bale went back to a non entity of a club like Spurs. In addition to this, I wouldn't want to see him back in the Premier League at all except for us one day.

[Jimmy the Jock]

Sheffield United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

Unlikely.

[TruBlue]

Should United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

I mean if Man United bid £80 million and then so did Spurs, surely it's up to the player where he goes too.

[lardy]

Should United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

This clause seems pretty pointless really.

I haven't read the wording, but I guess it means that Madrid have to tell Spurs. Otherwise they wouldn't know about it.

[Josef]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

[Colonel Cærdiffi]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Oh Josef.

[Bobby_The_Bhoy]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Mare!

[lardy]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Obviously someone who only became a fan in the Tan years.

[Culver Blue]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Oh dear me.

[poc]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

[Steve R]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Eh? Next you'll be telling me Kodi Titanium won't be signing for us.

[dadmancat]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Rhys Weston-Super-Mare

[Colonel Cærdiffi]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Rhys Weston-Super-Mare

OH WELL IM SORRY I DONT SPEND EVERY MINUTE ON HERE LIKE YOU SADDOS

[Steve R]

Darren Eales the Spurs Director will be ecstatic that's been leaked.

[Bevanroadblue]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

[TruBlue]

Should United - or anyone else, for that matter - make a bid for him, then Spurs have 72 hours to match the bid. Can't see them coughing up what will likely be in excess of £80m to bring him back, but there we go.

This clause seems pretty pointless really.

I mean if Man United bid £80 million and then so did Spurs, surely it's up to the player where he goes too.

You'd think they'd make it as widely known as possible amongst clubs who would possibly be interested. It would serve Madrid benefit for them to have more interested parties.

[TH63]

https://vine.co/v/OUA5e3mD1EP

[Alex DeLarge]

Nothing on there still about our sell on clause money.

Given the fact that Bale was never a City player it makes sense!!!!

Wow. Just wow.

[Steve R]

[Philb]

stop taking the piss, he could be onto something here, like why we`ve fallen foul of the ffp rules, no bale money no transfers, it all makes perfect sense.