Reply With Quote
Why do you do it?Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
So that means it was a triple shock? Three negatives equal a negative. Yep, now I get it, poor guy
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Sure. But as a compassionate man, and a father yourself, I'm sure you will share my hope that this story is bullshit.
Given the source of the story, I'm sure you can understand my confidence that it is indeed bullshit.
Why do you do it?So that means it was a triple shock? Three negatives equal a negative. Yep, now I get it, poor guy
I hope it is bull. I'm not sure that even the most evil jihadi is capable of what is suggested. Equally, I'm sure no one would drive a 19 ton truck along a pavement into men, women and children.
Surely?
I agree that the depths of depravity that these scum are capable of are incomprehensible to normal people, but we have clear evidence that the Nice tradgedy happened.
In terms of the reports of what was done to the Bataclan victims we have to rely on the same people that gave us "Freddie Starr ate my hamster"
There were 3 terrorist at the bataclan, the chance of this happening and not being revealed in all the interviews etc since is slim to none.
The 3 papers carrying the story are the sun, the daily mail and the New York post all quoting "heatstreet".
It's a deliberate shallow attempt to garner readers and website clicks. And Rupert Murdoch is just as bad too!
Maybe you should start reading it. Judging by your OP, I think you'd like it.Never read the sun once. I have looked at the front but never actually read it.
Again, hope this helps.
By the way, never eaten a burger either.
The Sun, NY Post, Heatstreet = Newscorp = Murdoch.
Enough said
Open goal for the colonel thereNever read the sun once. I have looked at the front but never actually read it.
Again, hope this helps.
By the way, never eaten a burger either.
How the **** is there any way that this story is true? The Bataclan is about a 1200 capacity venue. So it's not just a government cover-up, all the punters at the show are in on it too?
Precisely 1200 people wouldn't lie would they? I saw them on the telly myself, so it must be true what they said at that time.
Do you ever stop chatting complete empty headed shite?
You are just taking the piss now.
It would take someone lacking in intelligence to overlook the fact that this article is based on secondhand accounts of an incident that are being contradicted by firsthand accounts.
There were loads of interviews on the TV. They all gave detailed accounts of what happened. Not one person mentioned mutilations. They said the gunman just went around shooting people on the floor to make sure they were dead, and some of the survivors played dead. How do you get 1200 people to hide what Elysium said happened? I'm all ears if you have any suggestions.
OK so we have:
Some alleged atrocities have apparently come to light. After all this time.
Given the circumstances, and the numbers involved as perpetrators, and the length of time it took to carry out the rapid massacre , does this seems likely?And, why is it being reported by Newscorp / 'heatstreet' ? - now , all this time later?
Last edited by Vimana.; 16-07-16 at 23:47.
It's easy to sort out, just get Murdoch face to face with the Eagles of Death Metal and the rest of the survivors.
Last edited by Wales-Bales; 16-07-16 at 23:59.
And...
http://www.snopes.com/france-covered...aclan-victims/
That didn't take long.
I guess it's worth waiting up for Elysium's apology then
Daily **** were at it as well:
Yeah spot on croesy, it's political correctness gone mad.
Back under the stone you crawled out of.
No need for this post.
Shame on you.
Out of interest, have you ever checked out who owns and runs Snopes?
Yeah I totally know but you say first so I know that you know.
Make your mind up.
I've never seen so much rubbish written in one thread in all of my time here, it's just like being on the BBC website.
Last edited by Wales-Bales; 17-07-16 at 01:01.
Posting Permissions
