Reply With Quote
Why is it good?Originally Posted by kingbillyboy
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
good decision. well done to the conservatives.
Why is it good?
protection against evil people.
Racist
When there is no enemy within, the enemies outside cannot hurt you.
Nurse, nurse. Mr. Billy has got out of bed and is in the recreation room again..
you.ve confused me.
It was the only decision
I'm sure it will come to you.
Well done common sense.
Well done most of the plp for voting with their manifesto promise.
Just wondering, which countries would be queuing up to hit us with their nuclear weapons if we didn't have Trident?
Seems to me that we're under most threat from people who are only too willing to die for their cause, so our so called deterrent wouldn't be effective against them.
i'll go for Russia.....things can change quickly in this world, right now Syria could spark a Nuclear war.
If we ever use them we'll have to ask permission from the yanks first as we are their puppy dogs
I want our country to be taking the lead on getting rid of these terrible weapons, not spending over £30 billion on new ones.
^THIS
Spending the GDP of some nations to make ourselves the world's nuclear eunuch.
The good old U S of A and their right to bear arms.
Where has that got them?
bear.jpg
Last edited by insider; 19-07-16 at 07:56.
apart from being the most powerful nation in the world, nowhere
How do you define powerful ?
Ridiculous decision.
Utter waste of money that will only make the world a less safe place..
Bombs and common sense do not go together imo.
These bombs that we can never use, are likely to cost us considerably more than membership of the EU was costing us, only without any of the knock on benefits to the economy and not making us as safe either.
Suddenly the country is rich and can spend £30bn on something it hopes to never use.
USA
France
China
Russia
India
Pakistan
Israel
North Korea
These are the other countries with nuclear bombs. Therefore, countries like Canada, Spain, Germany, Japan, the whole of South America, the whole of Africa, the whole of Australasia are managing to avoid being attacked by nuclear bombs despite not having the deterrent.
My thoughts are that the UK should become more isolationist with regards to the ugly side of world politics (i.e. Syria, ISIS etc). That isn't giving in to terrorists, it's just us not being led astray by countries such as the US.
£31bn, let's fund the NHS instead. Why didn't anyone think of using this line?
They might as well just tell people we have them and spend the money on the NHS, would any of us know any know any different?
Maybe they already do thisThey might as well just tell people we have them and spend the money on the NHS, would any of us know any know any different?
Ultimate cost is likely to be in excess of £200bn not £30bn also
Posting Permissions
