+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 28 of 224 FirstFirst ... 18192021222324252627282930313233343536373878128 ... LastLast
Results 676 to 700 of 5577

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #676

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Llanedeyrnblue View Post
    Gloucester 68-7
    The groundsmen had better start looking for another job by the look of things

  2. #677

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by MacAdder View Post
    The groundsmen had better start looking for another job by the look of things
    This isn't the first time the Cheltenham appears to have been poorly prepared. This game will be over tomorrow. As usual,Glammy struggling to finish off the tail-Enders with Glos 140/9
    Yet again another Glammy run out today. Woeful

  3. #678
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    15,994

    Re: GLAMMY

    Rudolph out twice in one day.

    Glamorgan now 36 - 1 (12 ahead)

  4. #679

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    Rudolph out twice in one day.

    Glamorgan now 36 - 1 (12 ahead)
    His batting average is down to 27. Morgan in now and sadly he won't last long. Still another dozen odd overs tonight. Glammy could easily be 3 or 4 down by stumps

  5. #680

    Re: GLAMMY

    I was being optimistic. Three down already. Why the **** is Owen Morgan batting a three? They will be 6 or 7 down by close of play at this rate

  6. #681

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    I was being optimistic. Three down already. Why the **** is Owen Morgan batting a three? They will be 6 or 7 down by close of play at this rate

    Now 42/4 with four wickets going down in two overs. Spineless

  7. #682

    Re: GLAMMY

    If we can dig in a bit and send Glos into bat chasing something big like say 78, we might just come away with something.

  8. #683

    Re: GLAMMY

    24 wkts have fallen today so far, questions must be asked regarding the wicket, even allowing for our pathetic batting.

  9. #684

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Llanedeyrnblue View Post
    24 wkts have fallen today so far, questions must be asked regarding the wicket, even allowing for our pathetic batting.
    The pitch is clearly lively with a number of rising balls. You would have thought Cheltenham groundsmen would have learnt from previous problems. However we are playing against a poor side with a poor bowling attack and not the Windies c 1980. There are serious issues with our batting and the failed attempt to turn spinners into specialist batsman. It was obvious Morgan was going to be out quickly this evening.

  10. #685

    Re: GLAMMY

    54-5
    I'm not sure what the record is for the shortist ever Championship game, but I can see this one being over by lunch time tomorrow.

  11. #686

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by The Alien View Post
    54-5
    I'm not sure what the record is for the shortist ever Championship game, but I can see this one being over by lunch time tomorrow.
    Yep absolutely

  12. #687

  13. #688

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Llanedeyrnblue View Post

    This is going to lead to a points deduction for Glos. Some players out to balls rising steeply. Others out to balls that kept low. Our lot are partially exempted but even so the batting order is a complete shambles. It is not doing young Morgan any good coming in so high up the order when he clearly isn't ready.

  14. #689

    Re: GLAMMY

    Comments from someone on the Glammy cricket messageboard that the players do not believe the pitch is behaving that badly. Apparently 25 wickets in a day is a County record but am unsure if this is true.

  15. #690

    Re: GLAMMY

    Can only wish the ECB pitch inspector good luck in somehow to trying to decipher if Glamorgan's 15 wickets were a result of a poor pitch or poor batting.

  16. #691
    First Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Llantwit Major
    Posts
    2,599

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    Comments from someone on the Glammy cricket messageboard that the players do not believe the pitch is behaving that badly. Apparently 25 wickets in a day is a County record but am unsure if this is true.
    If the wicket isn't playing up then god help the batting coaches.
    You simply cannot have that many wickets in a day unless something is terribly wrong somewhere.

  17. #692

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Majorblue View Post
    If the wicket isn't playing up then god help the batting coaches.
    You simply cannot have that many wickets in a day unless something is terribly wrong somewhere.
    Croft said the wicket wasn't dangerous but did a bit of everything. Why Hogan didn't take up the option of making Glos bat first is beyond me. It was very cloudy at 11am so great bowling conditions.
    There needs to be some straight talking at the club because what is going on is so poor and amateurish.
    Regular run outs in the four day stuff is ridiculous, far too many no balls and extras in general, playing spinners as specialist batsmen when they are simply not up to it, batting collapses in most games, an inability to bowl out tail-enders.

    You have to wonder what the hell is going on during coaching sessions because they do not seem to be learning anything.

  18. #693

    Re: GLAMMY

    Maybe the pitch is dodgy, but Glamorgan have proved yet again that their specialist batting is the least able to cope with such conditions in the country - in fact, no matter what the conditions, Glamorgan's batting can find a way to look very, very average in them.

  19. #694

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    Croft said the wicket wasn't dangerous but did a bit of everything. Why Hogan didn't take up the option of making Glos bat first is beyond me. It was very cloudy at 11am so great bowling conditions.
    There needs to be some straight talking at the club because what is going on is so poor and amateurish.
    Regular run outs in the four day stuff is ridiculous, far too many no balls and extras in general, playing spinners as specialist batsmen when they are simply not up to it, batting collapses in most games, an inability to bowl out tail-enders.

    You have to wonder what the hell is going on during coaching sessions because they do not seem to be learning anything.
    Perhaps they're getting paid to throw matches. Would be a regular income stream.

  20. #695

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Arfur Europe View Post
    Perhaps they're getting paid to throw matches. Would be a regular income stream.
    I doubt we would be charged with this... it looks far too blatant!

  21. #696

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Maybe the pitch is dodgy, but Glamorgan have proved yet again that their specialist batting is the least able to cope with such conditions in the country - in fact, no matter what the conditions, Glamorgan's batting can find a way to look very, very average in them.
    People at the ground seem to think the pitch was lively but not as bad as 25 wickets in a day. Journo spoke to the ECB officer there, and he didn't expect a points deduction but there might be a strong slap on the wrist.

    Re Glammy's batting, Norwell and Payne are good bowlers at Div 2 level, both of whom I expect will move on soon but should not be enough to skittle any side for 100ish.

  22. #697

    Re: GLAMMY

    119-7......back to snails pace

    Cooke and Wagg are batting

  23. #698

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Arfur Europe View Post
    Perhaps they're getting paid to throw matches. Would be a regular income stream.
    It wouldn't be hard for them either

  24. #699

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glos set 135 to win.
    Soon as Wag went, just short of 50 partnership, they cleaned up the tail very quickly. Glammy take note!

  25. #700

    Re: GLAMMY

    48-0

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •