Never has a man been more vilified or pilloried for simply expressing historical facts. I understand fully if there are still some that find it slightly uncomfortable, but using that feeling of not liking what he said to try and close him down, when he's asserting facts is absurd.

Ken is fighting for free speech. That was something that we used to take for granted in this country.

You may disagree profoundly with his assertions but surely unless they are proven lies he should be allowed to express them?

What do the members of this board feel about this latest attack on free speech?