Originally Posted by
TH63
You posted
"It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition"
It took me about 30 seconds to find out that the above statement was false with the following statement issued by the journal
"Regarding the recent developments on social media, we would like to inform the public that neither the European Scientific Journal, ESJ, nor the European Scientific Institute, ESI have published content on 9/11 attacks."
Typically however, as this doesn't match your agenda, you gloss over it and instead focus on a point that does suit your agenda. Personally I stopped reading at "First thing to clear up would be that these claims were not actually published in The European Scientific Journal at all, or any scientific journal for that matter"
You found some sensationalist, let's call it for what it is "LIE" on some obscure blog/tweet/conspiracy site, which you immediately jumped on and presented as some form of proof of your theory without doing a single minute of basic investigation or corroboration to check its accuracy.
I am of course completely certain that you will refuse to accept any of the above, and instead try to distract us all away from the fundamental FACT that your post I referred to was, as I put it, "horseshit" and probably put me on ignore again but hey ho.
I would suggest that in future, you try to do some impartial research on the nonsense that you present as supporting evidence of your theories, but we both know you won't.
Still, if it makes you happy.