The girl says she remembers basically nothing other than the hotel lobby and a pizza.
If Ched raped her then, it's inconceivable the other lad didn't. If she consented to him and cant remember then surely the same defence extends to Ched?
Ched Evans defence get to question her tomorrow and her simple defence will be "I can't recall". I'm guessing it's tomorrow when this new evidence will be revealed.
Strange case this. How can one man rape a woman who doesn't give consent but not the other?