"Trump victory spells the end of traditional media influence"
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...edia-influence
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
"Trump victory spells the end of traditional media influence"
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blo...edia-influence
Can't speak for America, but I would confidently say that the mainstream media here had a massively bigger influence over people than alternative media for Brexit.
If this is true it's interesting..
He's not wrong:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/...g-down/424011/
It is odd she would call them "Al Jazeera America" because that doesn't even exist now.
A lack of knowledge that makes you sceptical.
Last edited by LordKenwyne; 10-11-16 at 16:19.
Al Jazeera are part of the club, they are not alternative media at all. They might have been pretending to provide a different viewpoint, but it was all spin and propaganda. They are funded by Qatar, who also sponsor the Clinton Foundation and ISIS. It's not at all surprising that Trump told them where to go.
The real power lies with elite bankers (which is a euphemism for the people that Splott Dai was forever criticising, and was banned for) and the worldwide network of central banks they control. One of the very few they don't is Syria's. Some others that they didn't were Libya and Iraq. You may or may not have noticed a theme here.
Some simpler stuff: you, or anyone, borrows £100,000 for a mortgage from, say, Barclays with a repayment period of 25 years at a 3.00% fixed interest rate over the entire term. Providing you make all repayments the property is yours. You would have paid them around £45,000 more than you borrowed. Let's also pretend that throughout the period your job paid you exactly £10,000 per year net. That would men, effectively, you have slogged exclusively for their financial benefit for four-and-a-half years. But that's fine because they enabled you to put a roof over your head and were kind enough to lend you the the dough, right?
Wrong! You borrowed money that didn't exist, and you were conned into becoming a debt slave to legalised thieves who operate a fractional reserve banking system. You won't believe what I've written. You would if you cared to research the subject which would be easy as you have the internet at your fingertips. But I know from having similar discussions down the years that Mrs Steve R's signature beneath her every post holds true for those who choose to remain wilfully ignorant.
Why does everything have to end up in an argument?
Those pesky Russians
http://russia-insider.com/en/politic...arious/ri17541
Forget about the personalities involved, but I find this article pretty depressing. i agree with the things said about specialist journalists having their reputations shredded, but, apparently, elections are won these days by the candidate who is "more entertaining" and generates "more passion" - a Facebook candidate for the Facebook generation.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37952249
Anyway, I've already stated above that it was on social media where the real Brexit battle took place, the mainstream media were merely pandering to their masters.