+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: 34% possession

  1. #1

    34% possession

    we needed 22% to win.

  2. #2

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Philbccfc View Post
    we needed 22% to win.
    It's a worthless statistic , you could stay in your own half passing the ball back n forth with very little to show other than fans departing to a bar to get pickled.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Philbccfc View Post
    we needed 22% to win.
    And a striker like Vardy.

  4. #4

    Re: 34% possession

    are you seriously suggesting ricky is not as good as vardy.

  5. #5

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Philbccfc View Post
    are you seriously suggesting ricky is not as good as vardy.
    Ricky is for life, Vardy is a flash in the pan.

  6. #6

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    And a striker like Vardy.
    Shame Slade didn't bring in such a striker when he suffered similar possession statistics.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Shame Slade didn't bring in such a striker when he suffered similar possession statistics.
    Shame Colin didn't address the striker issue seeing he is suffering less possession than any of our previous managers.

  8. #8

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Shame Colin didn't address the striker issue seeing he is suffering less possession than any of our previous managers.
    To be fair, he's come in and brought four out of contract players in, two of which have been terrific signings. There can't be that many good out of contract strikers about in October.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas View Post
    To be fair, he's come in and brought four out of contract players in, two of which have been terrific signings. There can't be that many good out of contract strikers about in October.
    If we are going to play the (very little possession ) Leicester way then we need an ace striker. Colin should have made that is number one priority.

  10. #10

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Shame Colin didn't address the striker issue seeing he is suffering less possession than any of our previous managers.
    Ok, which free agent strikers could he have brought in?

  11. #11

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    If we are going to play the (very little possession ) Leicester way then we need an ace striker. Colin should have made that is number one priority.
    Fair play, you're a clueless cock, to the point that you should really be considering why on earth you put yourself through ridicule every day on here. Warnock became manager after the transfer window closed and we no longer have the loan window. Please give us ideas of which free agent strikers he could have brought in?

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Just to shut eric up

    With Slade we averaged 49% possession

    With Colin we are averaging 41%

  13. #13

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Barry Shitpeas View Post
    To be fair, he's come in and brought four out of contract players in, two of which have been terrific signings. There can't be that many good out of contract strikers about in October.
    We all know that, bar one.

  14. #14

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Just to shut eric up

    With Slade we averaged 49% possession

    With Colin we are averaging 41%
    That wasn't the question asked, but nicely avoided.

    Last season Cardiff City's possession stats under Slade were ranked 14th. We finished 8th. Above Cardiff in the possession table were Brentford, Wolves, Fulham, MK Dons, Leeds, Reading and Huddersfield. 7 teams that had more possession than us but finished below us in the table. Should they have finished above us?

    What is maybe interesting is that Fulham, Reading and Huddersfield had far better possession stats last season than their league position warranted (according to your reckoning). This season they are now top half teams instead of being close to relegation.

    On the opposite side, Ipswich, Cardiff, QPR, Birmingham and Preston all had better league finishes than their possession stats warranted (according to your reckoning). This season, all of those, bar Birmingham, are now bottom half teams that are struggling.

    If possession is such an important thing, then those teams that had good possession stats last season have reaped the benefit, while those with poor possession stats have had the opposite and seen their sides plummet.

    Given all the above, the importance of possession etc, then the rot with Cardiff City was undoubtedly set last season. I wonder who was manager then?
    Last edited by Eric the Half a Bee; 10-12-16 at 23:48.

  15. #15

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Just to shut eric up

    With Slade we averaged 49% possession

    With Colin we are averaging 41%
    We didn't average 49% possession under Slade for the duration of his management.

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Ok, which free agent strikers could he have brought in?
    The same strikers you expected Slade to bring in.

  17. #17

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    The same strikers you expected Slade to bring in.
    Sorry, have you had a lobotomy?

    Are you really expecting Warnock, with no transfer window or loan window, to be able to bring in the same calibre of striker who could only be out of work as Slade, who had 3 transfer windows in which to operate and at least be able to spend money? Fcking clueless.
    Last edited by Eric the Half a Bee; 10-12-16 at 23:55.

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    We didn't average 49% possession under Slade for the duration of his management.
    It was a couple of points higher but you get my drift.

  19. #19

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    It was a couple of points higher but you get my drift.
    It wasn't, but by claiming so, you've undermined your argument.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Sorry, have you had a lobotomy?

    Are you really expecting Warnock, with no transfer window or loan window, to be able to bring in the same calibre of striker who could only be out of work as Slade, who had 3 transfer windows in which to operate and at least be able to spend money? Fcking clueless.
    Are you pissed or just thick? Colin managed to bring in 3 premiership quality players but couldn't find a striker. give up you dozey twat.

  21. #21

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Are you pissed or just thick? Colin managed to bring in 3 premiership quality players but couldn't find a striker. give up you dozey twat.
    For the third time, which out of work strikers of Championship quality could he have brought in, given that he didn't have a transfer or loan window in which to operate?

    Actually, I feel a need to clarify things here, just in case you're not certain.

    Warnock has not been able to buy or bring loan players into the club. He's only brought in free agents.

    I'd like to find out who these free agent strikers are that were out of work but could have been brought in. In fact, if they were talented enough but out of work, why didn't Slade spot them?
    Last edited by Eric the Half a Bee; 11-12-16 at 00:07.

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    For the third time, which out of work strikers of Championship quality could he have brought in, given that he didn't have a transfer or loan window in which to operate?
    Why do you keep harping on about a transfer or loan window? Am I wasting my time talking to a plum like you? You said Slade had 3 chances to bring in a striker who should he have brought in?

  23. #23

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Why do you keep harping on about a transfer or loan window? Am I wasting my time talking to a plum like you? You said Slade had 3 chances to bring in a striker who should he have brought in?
    Has Warnock had a transfer or loan window in which to bring in players? No. Slade did.
    Who are these strikers (for the 4th time) that were out of work that Warnock could have brought in?

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Cardifonia
    Posts
    2,339

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Has Warnock had a transfer or loan window in which to bring in players? No. Slade did.
    Who are these strikers (for the 4th time) that were out of work that Warnock could have brought in?
    Have you got some kind of condition where the mouth and brain don't work in unison?
    Slades remit was to get rid of players dopey.

  25. #25

    Re: 34% possession

    Quote Originally Posted by Tandy View Post
    Have you got some kind of condition where the mouth and brain don't work in unison?
    Slades remit was to get rid of players dopey.
    Are you suggesting that Slade could only bring in free agents?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •