+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 25 of 131

Thread: City in court again

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: City in court again

    I wish Tan would just leave this go. It stirs bad feeling in the football community when things are looking on the up for us.

  2. #2
    International Vimana.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    way out west
    Posts
    12,196

    Re: City in court again

    If there are outstanding matters and MM is implicated, then Vincent Tan should have just raised it when it came to light. Not now.
    In fact there ought to be a counter case of 'withholding knowledge of a crime (with malicious intent)'.

    If they should have been punished for a wrongdoing, then that should have been long underway.

    Now it looks vindictive and petty - whether MM / IM still have a case to answer or not.

    It seems that MM and Iain M are getting their careers back together.
    I seem to remember reading somewhere that Moody was on his backside and living back with his parents for a while? Cannot verify.

    FFS. Apparently a very poor way to go about things here, Vincent Tan.
    Last edited by Vimana.; 14-12-16 at 23:18.

  3. #3

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by Vimana. View Post
    If there are outstanding matters and MM is implicated, then Vincent Tan should have just raised it when it came to light. Not now.
    In fact there ought to be a counter case of 'withholding knowledge of a crime (with malicious intent)'.

    If they should have been punished for a wrongdoing, then that should have been long underway.

    Now it looks vindictive and petty - whether MM / IM still have a case to answer or not.

    It seems that MM and Iain M are getting their careers back together.
    I seem to remember reading somewhere that Moody was on his backside and living back with his parents for a while? Cannot verify.

    FFS. Apparently a very poor way to go about things here, Vincent Tan.
    Do you really think it is that easy to get a case heard in the High Court in 1 day? The case is being heard tomorrow FFS. This is merely a coincidence that it clashes with a new job for the racist.

    Tan probably raised this case months ago, and its only now making the media.

  4. #4
    International Vimana.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    way out west
    Posts
    12,196

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by Kris View Post
    Do you really think it is that easy to get a case heard in the High Court in 1 day? The case is being heard tomorrow FFS. This is merely a coincidence that it clashes with a new job for the racist.

    Tan probably raised this case months ago, and its only now making the media.

    The article uses the phrase 'Cardiff have launched a claim'.
    That would suggest that it is a fairly fresh event, but yeah, a one day turnaround does seem incredulous.

    It is the Daily Mail. It is also quite feasibly just desperate bollocks or full of made-up bits.
    I shouldn't rise to it.

  5. #5

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by Vimana. View Post
    The article uses the phrase 'Cardiff have launched a claim'.
    That would suggest that it is a fairly fresh event, but yeah, a one day turnaround does seem incredulous.

    It is the Daily Mail. It is also quite feasibly just desperate bollocks or full of made-up bits.
    I shouldn't rise to it.
    Sorry to go all Bluetit, but I think you mean incredible, not incredulous. :

  6. #6

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
    Sorry to go all Bluetit, but I think you mean incredible, not incredulous. :
    Eye ham hear ewe no

  7. #7
    International Vimana.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    way out west
    Posts
    12,196

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
    Sorry to go all Bluetit, but I think you mean incredible, not incredulous. :
    I might have used it wrongly?, but I did mean incredulous - as in 'incredulous to me'.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous


    TBH, an incorrect (or not) word is the least of my own woes in this thread, having a: taken the Daily Mail seriously and b: got slightly jerky of knee over it ;) deary me, what was I (not) thinking!

  8. #8

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by Vimana. View Post
    I might have used it wrongly?, but I did mean incredulous - as in 'incredulous to me'.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous


    TBH, an incorrect (or not) word is the least of my own woes in this thread, having a: taken the Daily Mail seriously and b: got slightly jerky of knee over it ;) deary me, what was I (not) thinking!
    I see the problem here, you're using a dictionary for yanks

  9. #9

    Re: City in court again

    They have launched a claim to have it heard in open court....not launched a claim

  10. #10
    Feedback
    Guest

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by Vimana. View Post
    If there are outstanding matters and MM is implicated, then Vincent Tan should have just raised it when it came to light. Not now.
    In fact there ought to be a counter case of 'withholding knowledge of a crime (with malicious intent)'.

    If they should have been punished for a wrongdoing, then that should have been long underway.

    Now it looks vindictive and petty - whether MM / IM still have a case to answer or not.

    It seems that MM and Iain M are getting their careers back together.
    I seem to remember reading somewhere that Moody was on his backside and living back with his parents for a while? Cannot verify.

    FFS. Apparently a very poor way to go about things here, Vincent Tan.
    maybe they have spent all this time looking for involvement of Inglis and Manasseh in the transfer dealings and it is only now they have accepted no involvement at all....

    playing devils advocate of course...

  11. #11

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by thehumblegringo View Post
    I wish Tan would just leave this go. It stirs bad feeling in the football community when things are looking on the up for us.
    He thinks someone has swindled £10m out of him. He's been letting lawyers investigate it for 3 years. He must have a strong case, because it's at the High Court, not a magistrate's court.

  12. #12
    International Mrs Steve R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Barry
    Posts
    29,223
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: City in court again

    Quote Originally Posted by Kris View Post
    He thinks someone has swindled £10m out of him. He's been letting lawyers investigate it for 3 years. He must have a strong case, because it's at the High Court, not a magistrate's court.
    From what I've heard he has, they were not checking his pockets for racist texts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •