| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Always thought that the bottom line between Tan and Malky was about Transfer fees not just all this Racism stuff.
If I remember right wasn't Cornelius and malky's agent the same fella?
Also i notice that no mention of this court case on the dark side. ***** must be sick of defending the un-defendable.
I think this happens a lot. I remember reading about how many of Mark Hughes' signings at Stoke were managed by his agent.Originally Posted by Whisperer
When there have been discussions about racism in football on here, it's usually said that football is a meritocracy and that the best players get picked. I wonder how many players have seen their careers halted before they've even started, not because of the colour of their skin but because of their choice of agent.
Yes alledgly Jose has the same connections , its part and parcel of the world of football , which is in desperate need of top to bottom regulation
This is the crux of the matter.The Cornelius transfer
If he was honest with himself I think he'd find he was sick of it.
There is a thread on ****:
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/vi...p?f=2&t=180242
Similar range of views as on here. Mainly 'lay off Malky', 'screw the thieving agents', 'the timing must be co-incidental'.
With the aUthoR defending Malky to the hilt.
The thread on there is quite refreshing.
The only people defending Malky are ***** and the grange end multi whose defence seems to consist of Barry Shitpeas and City123's posts copied from here.
As soon as ***** starts using facebook quotes to back himself up you know he is swimming against the tide.
My opinion is get this into public court and if guilty fuk em all, Tan may have done the football world a service.
He's there defending the un-defendable not having it his own way so starts posting the facebook quotes and using his multis to back himself up
I'd say the timing here is a coincidence, but the idea that the Daily Mail was tipped off by someone at the club about the hearing today after the news broke about Malky's proposed job seems plausible to me.
The obvious "dodgy" looking transfer from that summer was the Cornelius one (or so it seems to me at least), so it's a surprise to see that the charges stem from a couple of deals where we paid what I'd say was the going rate for the two players involved - reportedly, we also got our money back when Caulker signed for QPR and the Jones/Odemwingie swap was generally thought to be a fair one, in financial terms at least, at the time.
I dont think its the transfer costs that are the issue, but more the agents fees which go on top.....I think
Is chepstow aBRAhAM in disguise!!!!
The Pied Piper lives on .Is chepstow aBRAhAM in disguise!!!!
Either that or Tandy.Is chepstow aBRAhAM in disguise!!!!
He is the result of romantic few hours spent at the back of the bus between Tannis and Ankles.Is chepstow aBRAhAM in disguise!!!!
If you mess with Tan look out.I was told from day one that he is a man of honour and principles.If you cross him thats it you will regret it and I dont blame him.He made one big mistake by changing our colour and put that right along with saving the club but some only a small number will not forgive.On the other hand you can be a football hooligan drag the name of our club through the dirt be forgiven and welcomed back its a strange old world we live in.
Who on earth are you talking about? But you are 100% correct.
Strange supporters down this way.
you don't know what he is talking about but say he is 100% correct. WTF?
what you talking about
he didnt just change our colour, he raped us of our identity blah blah blah
Oh and if that wasnt enough, he gave away red scarfs AND put red seats in the stand he paid for
Damm the man, Damm the man, he just aint Scam the man
worst of all, he hasn't bought a single fecking ice cream
no wonder he is hated so much
People are so OTT with how they judge others.
A foreign businessman that tried to create a commercially viable club for our and his gain.
He didn't understand how much the identity meant to the fans.
He lied to fans about the change.
But I wouldn't go so far as to call him "vile".
To be fair to him, he's going in the right direction to some form of redemption. But like the hooligans you mention, he dragged the club's name through the dirt in my opinion and there's still some way to go before he is forgiven.
To be honest I dont think there is any comparison between Tan and the hooligans.Tan did what he did thinking it was the best for the club.He has stuck with us despite all the abuse and seems to learning from mistakes.I would rather be with him than without.It appears my remarks have struck a nerve.Its a pity that this matter is opening up old wounds but there is a really serious matter involved in these legal proceeding and if the allegation are correct then Tan should be applauded for standing up to people who would suck the life out of the game to fill their own pockets.
Nailed it.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote