+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Those who would give up essential Security and Safety, to maintain the Liberty of those who wish to cause harm deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.Originally Posted by Croesy Blue;4709774[B
Yet the minority of the country seem happy to give up a huge chunk of the whole country's Security and Safety for what is essentially no harm to the average person's Liberty.
Aren't we already the most watched citizens in the world with the number of CCTV cameras? If UK liberty and UK security were a weighing scale then the balance already sits comfortably with security.
Capita, though not a government department, raised suspicion over people's benefits simply because they lived above a "WH Smith" which lead to them being stopped. It may be a lack of understanding that introduces suspicion and that can spiral into something much worse for an innocent person.
There is potential that the mountain of data leads to searching for a needle in a haystack and the action that needs to be analysed is lost.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38583357
And so it begins
Case: 432870 Date: 12/01/2017 User: nugent
Thanks for doing your patriotic duty. Looks like you've earned your liberty for another day.
Ensure you are ready for tomorrow's spot check, citizen.
--
Sponsored by Murdoch Industries Freedom Spot Checks and Prison Facilities Inc.
Do you think terrorists just use a normal broadband provider and internet explorer? Any one intent on causing destruction who's clever enough to actually be dangerous will be using TOR or another such system.
This won't reveal anything about people like that.
Also it's been 12 years since the last major terorrist plot happened in this country, is it worth giving up a civil liberty for something which either isn't as big a threat as the media wants you to think or is already being handled by our security services without the need to look at what sites I've been visiting and what emails I've been sending?
I am not sure you quite understand the point of this change in the law. They have already been doing this, is one form or another, but it wasnt "legal" to be able to be presented in court. much of this is nothing new, only now they are enshrining it into law. Whereas before it was done anyway, but couldnt be presented in court.
And the secret services have found weak points in Tor, its more invasive to be able to use. But these new powers likely give them the legal right to use the more invasive powers.
And its 12 years for a reason. The same reason why most of europe is copying and catching up with what we have been doing for a couple of decardes
You're giving up the freedom to privacy and it isn't just about this anyway if civil liberties are being eroded so easily who knows what next.
What's to stop anyone who's an annoyance to the government, any opposition or protester having their internet history used to slander them?
I'd never have thought reading 1984 that it was going to be so accurate nor did I think people would be happy to accept it based on fear mongering by the media.
People slander the government of the day.
People despise parking fines, speed fines, fines for being on your phone while driving.
Fines for no TV licenses.
A friend of a family member got fined £1000 for having an out of date drivers license.
etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
Day to day people hate the law/government. As 90% of the time they only hear from them in a negative situation. Then they're happy to sign over every lasts scrap of information....
For some reason they've got it into their heads the law and government does the right and correct thing for the people.
I'm surprised the calls to ban whatsapp haven't happened yet considering every message is encrypted.
Has bluetit ever said something funny? That'd probably be a good use for the snooper's charter
People are paranoid about the government "snooping" yet they give out loads of information on social media.
We probably know more about the Colonel than his Mrs