Pregnant People

[Mrs Steve R]

That is a great link, shows that third-wave feminism is prejudice disguised as enlightenment.

This afternoon, I've googled the phrase "sex differences in juvenile primates" to see the published literature on whether young apes and monkeys display sexually dimorphic behaviours, especially in the ways that they play. Overwhelmingly the answer is yes, they do.

Male juvenile non-human primates prefer rough and tumble play whereas female juvenile non-human primates prefer nurturing play. There are many studies that show this and some take into account and adjust for the fact that the apes/monkeys are, to an extent, socialised into this behaviour as well as having their behaviour determined by their chromosomes.

For example: https://animalwise.org/2012/01/26/bo...s-in-primates/

The comments section for this article was hijacked by a feminist named JZGongen. Her views are very revealing, even though she claims not to be a 3rd waver.

Interesting read, "I’m using a fuzzy version of the word “rape”. To clarify, male chimps will intimidate, harass, or strike female chimps so they can copulate." ahh just like men then they are not happy unless they have got the word rape in somewhere, they hijack stuff like that all the time.

Scientists are getting fed up with them..

https://heatst.com/world/science-has...mod=sm_fb_post
"Prominent neuroscientist Larry Cahill spoke out this month, confessing that scientists are censoring themselves because they are afraid of being called sexist for telling the truth."

Is Modern Feminism Incompatible With Science?
http://www.acsh.org/news/2016/10/26/...-science-10366

"former feminist Toni Airaksinen warns about the dangers of modern feminism, particularly as taught in women's studies classes, which she has described as a "rabbit hole" that leads to a "perverse wonderland where up is down."

That is a perfect description, it has really played with my head this week tbh, I know people on here think I'm a bit mad but it was way too mad for me.

[Eric Cartman]

I'd mentioned before - only to be ridiculed by RJK - that part of the globalist agenda is to pit men against women, with the aim of ultimately eradicating the Y-Chromosome. There can be no doubt that the traditional family has been under ideological assault for decades; the Soviets preferred their women to work, legalised abortion and homosexuality, and provided state-run childcare from birth. These policies have been gradually adopted by the "West", along with children being adopted by, for example, two gay men.

I believe that breaking these former taboos is tied up with transhumanism, robots, cyborgs and cloning. The last taboo to be broken will be cloning, maybe with a chimera element to it. Once people accept clones/chimeras there will be no taboos left to break and the globalists will have created their perfect society with workers and sex-slaves loving their servitude.

To quote from 1984:

"The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy--everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy."

This bit is definitely accurate.

[Mrs Steve R]

This bit is definitely accurate.

I read a mans comment last night saying he had just lost a 35 year friendship over Donald Trump, crazy.

[severncity]

Interesting read, "I’m using a fuzzy version of the word “rape”. To clarify, male chimps will intimidate, harass, or strike female chimps so they can copulate." ahh just like men then they are not happy unless they have got the word rape in somewhere, they hijack stuff like that all the time.

Scientists are getting fed up with them..

https://heatst.com/world/science-has...mod=sm_fb_post
"Prominent neuroscientist Larry Cahill spoke out this month, confessing that scientists are censoring themselves because they are afraid of being called sexist for telling the truth."

Is Modern Feminism Incompatible With Science?
http://www.acsh.org/news/2016/10/26/...-science-10366

"former feminist Toni Airaksinen warns about the dangers of modern feminism, particularly as taught in women's studies classes, which she has described as a "rabbit hole" that leads to a "perverse wonderland where up is down."

That is a perfect description, it has really played with my head this week tbh, I know people on here think I'm a bit mad but it was way too mad for me.

The comments in your second link are well worth reading. The notion of gender is torn to shreds repeatedly but the two feminists involved in the debate are metaphorically putting their fingers in their ears and saying "la la la la".

When confronted with the assertion that 99% of people have gender aligned with their sex and, what's more, couldn't give a flying **** about their own gender, the feminazis argument is that people display a wide range of what they term "gender fluidity":

"There is a great deal of gender fluidity in many cultures, including our own. We have manly men and sissy men, corporate men who don't perform the ultra-masculine role of, say, professional wrestlers, and even men who are cross-dressers. Women in the U.S. can be butch, or Texas beauty-queen girlie, and lots of things between."

My answer would be "so what?" If people can choose where they place themselves in the spectrum of gender, due to its or their own "fluidity", how does identifying this, labelling it and studying it help anybody? When I go down the City I swear and shout. When I'm with my grandson I hug and kiss him. That doesn't make me a machoman or sissy. It just shows that I'm a relatively normal man capable of a range of behaviours. Sometimes I wear clothes like combats and boots, and have a full beard - that makesme look more manly. At other times I wear t shirts, jeans and am clean shaven - less manly. Nothing to do with gender.

A great comment was:

"Gender is a social construct, but homosexuals are born that way. Nothing like a little consistency."

That had the feminists in a flap.

[Mrs Steve R]

The comments in your second link are well worth reading. The notion of gender is torn to shreds repeatedly but the two feminists involved in the debate are metaphorically putting their fingers in their ears and saying "la la la la".

When confronted with the assertion that 99% of people have gender aligned with their sex and, what's more, couldn't give a flying **** about their own gender, the feminazis argument is that people display a wide range of what they term "gender fluidity":

"There is a great deal of gender fluidity in many cultures, including our own. We have manly men and sissy men, corporate men who don't perform the ultra-masculine role of, say, professional wrestlers, and even men who are cross-dressers. Women in the U.S. can be butch, or Texas beauty-queen girlie, and lots of things between."

My answer would be "so what?" If people can choose where they place themselves in the spectrum of gender, due to its or their own "fluidity", how does identifying this, labelling it and studying it help anybody? When I go down the City I swear and shout. When I'm with my grandson I hug and kiss him. That doesn't make me a machoman or sissy. It just shows that I'm a relatively normal man capable of a range of behaviours. Sometimes I wear clothes like combats and boots, and have a full beard - that makesme look more manly. At other times I wear t shirts, jeans and am clean shaven - less manly. Nothing to do with gender.

A great comment was:

"Gender is a social construct, but homosexuals are born that way. Nothing like a little consistency."

That had the feminists in a flap.

I hadn't read the comments on that one tbh but I've been reading them on various articles all week and their views change depending on the subject and sometimes change mid argument, here a few pages I found on fb, there is quite a bit of mockery on them but also some links to interesting articles.
https://www.facebook.com/evilfeminism
https://www.facebook.com/Humanity-vs...07609579339834
https://www.facebook.com/RevealingFeminism

You might like the vegan feminists too.

"What is a Rape Rack?: Why Feminism Applies to Cows"
https://veganfeminist.blogspot.co.uk...m-applies.html

Fifty shades of chicken
http://veganfeministnetwork.com/tag/misogyny/