+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
So Trump was in the wrong place at the wrong time because during the electoral process the FBI were generally inadequate in procedure when serving FISA warrants, Have I got that right? So on that basis whoever got elected would have been in the wrong place at the wrong time?
They were tasked to stop him, but it's fairly obvious that's not the only thing they were up to. Not to mention people like you were sold the Russia collusion BS, and then spent next 3 years inadvertently trying to cover up a huge conspiracy. You have been way out of your depth since Day 1, and still the penny hasn't dropped has it
Thanks. for your scattered thoughts. I don't know if you noticed but there are a bunch of idiots over on the main board giving your hero all sorts of shit about the way he has been managing the country since he was legitimately elected. Surprised you haven't put them in their place yet!
Rank and Vile – DOJ Inspector General Identifies 93 Percent Non-Compliance Within FISA Review – Issues So Bad IG Presents Interim Report Before Reviewing Details
♦ Within the 29 FISA applications reviewed, four were completely missing the Woods File. Meaning there was zero supportive evidence for any of the FBI claims against U.S. persons underpinning the FISA application. [ie. The FBI just made stuff up]
♦ Of the remaining 25 FISA applications, 100% of them, all of them, were materially deficient on the woods file requirement; and the average number of deficiencies per file was 20. Meaning an average of twenty direct statements against the target, supporting the purpose of the FISA application, sworn by the FBI affiant, were unsubstantiated. [The low was 5, the high was 63, the average per file was 20]
♦ Half of the FISA applications reviewed used Confidential Human Sources (CHS’s). The memo outlines that “many” of applications containing CHS claims had no supportive documentation attesting to the dependability of the CHS.
♦ Two of the 25 FISA applications reviewed had renewals; meaning the FISA applications were renewed to extended surveillance, wiretaps, etc. beyond the initial 90-days. None of the renewals had any re-verification. Both FISAs that used renewals were not compliant.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ewing-details/