+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 25 of 9155

Thread: The Donald Trump thread

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: The Donald Trump thread

    Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
    So, correct me if I am wrong, the FBI are accused of making the same type of procedural errors in cases that have feck all to do with people who left the Trump campaign as they did in the last two FISA applications on Carter Page.

    The Deep State is so devious that when undermining the campaign and then the legitimate election of a President of the USA that they fecked up loads of other applications just to cover their tracks. Seems like 45 wasn't so special at all?
    Who were they getting their orders from and what were those orders? I've always said Trump was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and you were wrong to make it just about him. It has always been a rule of law issue from way before the 2016 election.

  2. #2

    Re: The Donald Trump thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    Who were they getting their orders from and what were those orders? I've always said Trump was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and you were wrong to make it just about him. It has always been a rule of law issue from way before the 2016 election.
    So Trump was in the wrong place at the wrong time because during the electoral process the FBI were generally inadequate in procedure when serving FISA warrants, Have I got that right? So on that basis whoever got elected would have been in the wrong place at the wrong time?

  3. #3

    Re: The Donald Trump thread

    Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
    So Trump was in the wrong place at the wrong time because during the electoral process the FBI were generally inadequate in procedure when serving FISA warrants, Have I got that right? So on that basis whoever got elected would have been in the wrong place at the wrong time?
    They were tasked to stop him, but it's fairly obvious that's not the only thing they were up to. Not to mention people like you were sold the Russia collusion BS, and then spent next 3 years inadvertently trying to cover up a huge conspiracy. You have been way out of your depth since Day 1, and still the penny hasn't dropped has it

  4. #4

    Re: The Donald Trump thread

    Thanks. for your scattered thoughts. I don't know if you noticed but there are a bunch of idiots over on the main board giving your hero all sorts of shit about the way he has been managing the country since he was legitimately elected. Surprised you haven't put them in their place yet!

  5. #5

    Re: The Donald Trump thread

    Quote Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays View Post
    Thanks. for your scattered thoughts. I don't know if you noticed but there are a bunch of idiots over on the main board giving your hero all sorts of shit about the way he has been managing the country since he was legitimately elected. Surprised you haven't put them in their place yet!
    Rank and Vile – DOJ Inspector General Identifies 93 Percent Non-Compliance Within FISA Review – Issues So Bad IG Presents Interim Report Before Reviewing Details

    ♦ Within the 29 FISA applications reviewed, four were completely missing the Woods File. Meaning there was zero supportive evidence for any of the FBI claims against U.S. persons underpinning the FISA application. [ie. The FBI just made stuff up]

    ♦ Of the remaining 25 FISA applications, 100% of them, all of them, were materially deficient on the woods file requirement; and the average number of deficiencies per file was 20. Meaning an average of twenty direct statements against the target, supporting the purpose of the FISA application, sworn by the FBI affiant, were unsubstantiated. [The low was 5, the high was 63, the average per file was 20]

    ♦ Half of the FISA applications reviewed used Confidential Human Sources (CHS’s). The memo outlines that “many” of applications containing CHS claims had no supportive documentation attesting to the dependability of the CHS.

    ♦ Two of the 25 FISA applications reviewed had renewals; meaning the FISA applications were renewed to extended surveillance, wiretaps, etc. beyond the initial 90-days. None of the renewals had any re-verification. Both FISAs that used renewals were not compliant.

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ewing-details/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •