https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.5472b094c06b
More fake news. Don't know why they're bothering, if there was anything to be found on Trump then it would be found out already. The guy is clean as a whistle.
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.5472b094c06b
More fake news. Don't know why they're bothering, if there was anything to be found on Trump then it would be found out already. The guy is clean as a whistle.
Great interview, really great interview. Here's an excerpt:
TRUMP: I have had the best reviews on foreign land. So I go to Poland and make a speech. Enemies of mine in the media, enemies of mine are saying it was the greatest speech ever made on foreign soil by a president.
And another one bites the dust - shame, he was great entertainment.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40687521
He did a great job, great person, we've got the best people.
https://twitter.com/TheDailyShow/sta...35212874649604
Scaramucci, Scaramucci, will he do the Fandango? ;)
The 'long term Trump supporter', major Republican donor and Fox News contributor was interviewed by Don and his daughter.
Good luck feller.
Your bond will surely be especially tested when you will will be sent out to say one thing, and then Big Don will tweet something completely different only a few hours later.
Today's episode.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...trump-campaign
Usual fake news disclaimer applies.
* The Post cited an unnamed US official
** A (unnamed) justice department spokeswoman told the paper: “Obviously I cannot comment on the reliability of what anonymous sources describe in a wholly uncorroborated intelligence intercept that the Washington Post has not seen and that has not been provided to me.”
TBF that is the wording of their own disclaimer in their own article, except you left out their preface: "However in a statement .." which serves to indicate that the Guardian are not entirely convinced of the veracity either.
Not sure what your motive was there.. ;)
Anyway, I'm sure Jeff Sessions will be apoplectic regard these 'scandalous untruths' and will soon chime in.
As is often said around here, we can expect some fireworks 'real soon'. No doubt.
It now seems as if Trump believes the story.
He has tweeted about it referring to this as a "leak" . If he thought that the whole thing was bull, surely that is the angle that he would take?
With Scarramuccis appointment, it looks like the Don is maybe panicking and heading fully off-piste, as apparently this act is again wholly at odds with the advice of chief strategist Bannon.
It is increasingly hard to feel that Donald has any intention, inclination, nor ability to ' drain the swamp', nor right wrongs, nor sort out the dark state.
It's been a busy start for him. He's been deleting all the tweets where he criticised trump.
That he didn't think of doing this before accepting, and only then when a Fake News Journalist found them, doesn't bode well for his job as.... erm... Communications Director.
^^
I'll give him two months before Donny Dorko decides that he 'didn' like his pick' - almost certainly for the usual reasons. (lack of ability to meet uber-narcissist lunatic expectations).
Two months. Him or Don. Whichever slips in the shit first.
He's no Sean Spicer ...
I gave it a go... ;)
Slicker horseshitter .. still a horseshitter.
I'll stick with 'gone within 2 months'. !
Yeah, he'd do well flogging junk on TV shopping channels. Heather Nauert, the State Department spokeswoman, is a polished and photogenic bullshitter, but just like Spicer her eyes and frowns always give her away whenever she's lying.
Here's something Trump may be able to say he actually achieved during his presidency.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40692709
Trump tweeting about pardons, his lawyer on telly talking about pardons.
The actions of an innocent man