https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...61209.html?amp
Are we still talking about Hunter Biden's laptop?
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...61209.html?amp
Are we still talking about Hunter Biden's laptop?
Are the credulous still sending their life savings to Trump, Giuliani and the rest of the syndicate in the belief they are funding lawsuits to expose election fraud? This is the most cynical fundraising con yet. Very sad.
No point in recounting existing voting ballots is there ?
to me you should audit the ballot votes for signatures and addresses etc but then again reading between the lines ballots have disappeared into thin air in some states !
anyway onto pennsylvania the judge blocks certification
https://davidharrisjr.com/steven/jud...ction-results/
things are hotting up just reading some woman has been arrested for voter fraud in Wisconsin for voting for a dead person !!
I remember this bit because it was actually based on fact. It was a bit bizarre as it didn't impact the certification of the Presidential Election as that had already taken place but did freeze the certification of the election of the Republican who brought the lawsuit.Originally Posted by MOZZER2
Anyway....... another one bites the dust!
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...ication-440928
The Pennsylvania one is halted until tomorrow. There's no precedent for what the judge has done and I'll be shocked if it hasn't been rectified by the end of Friday.
As for things "hotting up"... You'll have to explain why.
If you think a woman in Wisconsin being arrested for voter fraud where the system is obviously working as her vote wasn't counted and...well, she was caught , is proving something else, then please spell it out for us.
For things to go the way you think/hope they are then you would literally need to see them find evidence of hundreds of thousands to potentially millions of counts of voter fraud. Not dozens.
Why do you think Trump hasn't gone after any of the states that Biden was declared to win early? Was there no widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire, Washington state, Oregon etc, just in the states that were called later due to the way that the counting procedures were run?
It's all very exciting for people who desperately want there to be something underhand going on and there is some big conspiracy that Biden stole the election. When, in fact, it's simply that Trump lost the election because of his response to Covid and the BLM stuff. If he had managed either one of those national crises well (or even just slightly better than he did and not sow discourse throughout the states) then he more than likely would have won.
One final thing before I go to bed.
Can you qnswer this question, please... Why do you think the Democrats would need to allow people to fraudulently use their votes (dead people, different signatures, voting twice, voting later than was legally approved by the courts etc), destroy Trump ballots and make some disappear in places that they would be more likely to get caught, block spotters in counting rooms etc... Ultimately, leaving a lot more room to make mistakes and leave traces of evidence of wrongdoing, if they had the power to switch Trump votes to Biden using Dominion software?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1762554.html
Thought you may enjoy this one, Jon.
How can such a dumb ass be in a financial position where he can happily give away millions? What have I done wrong with my life?
not s happy man is he
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg1J9k4tyAI
Annoying, isn't it?!How can such a dumb ass be in a financial position where he can happily give away millions? What have I done wrong with my life?
Mozzy, mate... See my above post. It's 100% unlikely to resonate with you because you seem to have strayed too far from the light with the election fraud stuff, but please read it and consider my points.
The scattergun approach to accusations and lawsuits brought on by Trump (still without any evidence after almost 3 weeks of declaring that there was widespread voter fraud) should make you wonder what possible reason they could have for not showing their cards and putting this all to bed now, right?
They haven't got time for playing poker with their supposed evidence as Biden is going be inaugurated in a couple of months and the transition of power has already begun!
C'mon, man! This new look doesn't suit you.
you will be pleased to know that his legal has lost an appeal today to overturn the decision in pennsylvannia . I think this has been designed by trumps legal team as it will go to the supreme court even quicker
as for evidence check the 104 page lawsuit above by sidney powell in terms of bad practice at polling stations . talking of her just saw some footage of her claiming her legal team has now got pics and footage of ballot harvesting and evidence of more than 10 million illegal votes . No doubt this will be used in the supreme court as evidence
maybe it's all b@@llocks who knows but lots of mileage in this election for sure get the pop corn out
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...court-showdown
Mozz,you will be pleased to know that his legal has lost an appeal today to overturn the decision in pennsylvannia . I think this has been designed by trumps legal team as it will go to the supreme court even quicker
as for evidence check the 104 page lawsuit above by sidney powell in terms of bad practice at polling stations . talking of her just saw some footage of her claiming her legal team has now got pics and footage of ballot harvesting and evidence of more than 10 million illegal votes . No doubt this will be used in the supreme court as evidence
maybe it's all b@@llocks who knows but lots of mileage in this election for sure get the pop corn out
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...court-showdown
I fear I can't help but there might be bits of clarity in the following:
The Pennsylvania lawsuit that Guiliani presented was first considered by a judge who was considered a right wing Republican. He ripped it to shreds. Trump's gang appealed. Three Republican judges, the lead of which was appointed by Trump shredded it even further.
Trump's lawyers supposedly cheer because the strategy of presenting a shit case to the lower court, which was the same shit case that went to the appeal court can now be the shit case that goes to the Supreme Court. At which point it will be the first time it is considered by any judge appointed by a Democrat President. Obviously the swivel eyed mob expect the new make up of the Supreme Court to forget their oath to the constitution and overturn the Pennsylvania election.
The lead judge said "“Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,” Remember that Mozz.
As for Sidney in Georgia and Michigan... completely different case. She may look she's away with the fairies but those fairies are funded by lots of people like your mates in the States who believe this shit and are happy to fill Sidney's bank account up to and beyond the point she is laughed out of court.
You know that new evidence can't be introduced to the supreme court via appeals, right?you will be pleased to know that his legal has lost an appeal today to overturn the decision in pennsylvannia . I think this has been designed by trumps legal team as it will go to the supreme court even quicker
as for evidence check the 104 page lawsuit above by sidney powell in terms of bad practice at polling stations . talking of her just saw some footage of her claiming her legal team has now got pics and footage of ballot harvesting and evidence of more than 10 million illegal votes . No doubt this will be used in the supreme court as evidence
maybe it's all b@@llocks who knows but lots of mileage in this election for sure get the pop corn out
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...court-showdown
exactly why powell and the trump team split . shes got her fingers on the pulse with dominion whilst his team did the donkey work with voting discrepancies
they were going nowhere fast !
This makes no sense.
You said that they were losing cases quickly (P39 W1 L38) to get to the supreme court quicker, but they're losing because the cases have very little, or usually no, evidence. They would be taking the exact same cases there.
There was a time when it looked like Trump had his new judge on the supreme court ready to make a decisive ruling in his favour, but those days are gone. It cannot happen now. I know you won't take my word for it, but it's the truth.
They lost another appeal today, so they're doing well.
Out of interest, does anyone know if this is the normal procedure for cases? Try to lose as quickly as you can to get to the biggest one?
Because I thought winning in court was supposed to be the good outcome. Why don't regular lawyers do this, and bring no evidence so they lose as fast as they can?
Nothing can stop what's coming 😜 you guardian reading leftist fools😛
I know January 20th. It's even got a date for a change!
Trump will still be president 👍
Nurse... nurse... !
This might explain certain behaviours given the advocacy of the miracle cure
https://www.politico.eu/article/drug...ders-says-ema/
i agree voters choose the president
trump lost and has the right to challenge this using the powers that's presented to him
over to wisconsin now think this whole process is going to supreme court too infact all of the swing states will me thinks
https://thegreggjarrett.com/emergenc...-160000-votes/
if the supreme courts kick all the evidence into touch in all swing states do you think this sideny powell will be taken to court herself for false evidence ?
Ever thought what username you might fancy when this is all over Mozz?
MOZZER2 will suit me fine
i would hate to be 1 of those multi user names
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote