Quote Originally Posted by Barry Dragon View Post
No they have not. She acknowledged the contract. If you do not acknowledge the contract then she wouldn't have had to pay. Her defence was she thinks it's unenforceable. If she just said she didn't realise they HAD to be paid and formed a contract then she would have got away with it.

The judges wording clearly shows she has to pay because she had acknowledged the signage.



I think you may find that your wrong

The Rules have changed