+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 25 of 45

Thread: Huddersfield's 10 changes

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    I would least like Huddersfield to go up because they're the least likely to be good next season. Selfish but there we go. Sheff Weds, Fulham and Reading are all bigger clubs and are less likely to have players poached. Also, players like Mooy and Palmer are loanees and will go back.

    I would rather they played their strongest side. They have all season* but they gave Birmingham a team in wretched form**, an easier game. 3 points matters down there, and I don't think it is right. This isn't bad luck, it is the fact that Birmingham have effectively been gifted three points. Also, now Forest and Blackburn could both get 51 points and go down.

    Resting players 3 weeks before the playoffs is farcical and shouldn't be done against teams with something to play for. I doubt Wagner would be so chuffed if they went up and Man Utd played a weakened side against a rival a la West Ham when Sheffield United got relegated***.
    * Not true, the stats show they have used a squad throughout the season.
    **Their form is consistent with their whole season.
    ***West Ham played with illegal players, not a weakened team!


    The league is to blame, not the football clubs...

  2. #2

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by OurManFlint II View Post
    * Not true, the stats show they have used a squad throughout the season.
    **Their form is consistent with their whole season.
    ***West Ham played with illegal players, not a weakened team!


    The league is to blame, not the football clubs...
    Point 1, they rested all of their star players. Players like Mooy, Schindler, Lowe, van la Parra and Wells have started almost every game, whereas Bunn and Holmes-Dennis were making their 5th and 3rd starts of the season. It is fine to rotate but when you chuck an entire squad of players that have barely played, you regularly get results like Saturday.
    Point 2, they have 2 wins out of 24, before Saturday. So before that, they'd won half their games. Birmingham have been awful post Rowett, and they were given an easy task.
    Point 3, Manchester United played the weakened side, allowing West Ham to win and relegating Sheff Utd. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...em/6627803.stm

  3. #3
    Feedback
    Guest

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Point 2, they have 2 wins out of 24, before Saturday. So before that, they'd won half their games. Birmingham have been awful post Rowett, and they were given an easy task.

  4. #4

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by TISS View Post
    They had 31 points after 21 games. I don't see your point?

  5. #5

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Point 1, they rested all of their star players. Players like Mooy, Schindler, Lowe, van la Parra and Wells have started almost every game, whereas Bunn and Holmes-Dennis were making their 5th and 3rd starts of the season. It is fine to rotate but when you chuck an entire squad of players that have barely played, you regularly get results like Saturday.
    Point 2, they have 2 wins out of 24, before Saturday. So before that, they'd won half their games. Birmingham have been awful post Rowett, and they were given an easy task.
    Point 3, Manchester United played the weakened side, allowing West Ham to win and relegating Sheff Utd. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...em/6627803.stm
    West Ham won on a penalty taken and scored by an illegal player.

    Sheff Utd had to win at home to f*****g Wigan but lost to a penalty! It was all in Shef Utds hands, nobody else.

    League to blame, not clubs.

  6. #6

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by OurManFlint II View Post
    West Ham won on a penalty taken and scored by an illegal player.

    Sheff Utd had to win at home to f*****g Wigan but lost to a penalty! It was all in Shef Utds hands, nobody else.

    League to blame, not clubs.
    Yes the League were to blame as well but Manchester United gave West Ham a greater chance to win? Surely you can see that by not playing Ronaldo etc it gave West Ham a massive helping hand? This is just one example of this happening.

  7. #7

    Re: Huddersfield's 10 changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Yes the League were to blame as well but Manchester United gave West Ham a greater chance to win? Surely you can see that by not playing Ronaldo etc it gave West Ham a massive helping hand? This is just one example of this happening.
    Fine margins, both game decided by penalties and as mentioned HAD Shef Utd won their game at home to Wigan they might not have been relegated.

    West Ham should have been in bigger trouble for illegal players but Man Utds side didn't impact the Shef Utd result, they lost!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •