| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Warnocks slight improvement on last season is down to having an assistant manager who is far more expierenced than Trollope.
He also has a first team coach who was a manager.
So Warnocks points average is not much better than last season considering the management team we have.
Originally Posted by Tandy
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...S1Ib7bPKFtQmjQ
Just think, if Kevin Blackwell and Ronnie Jepson had been at Brighton instead of Paul Trollope, they would have been Champions now after having won their last thirty five matches of the season - I make it they would have ended up with 126 points.
It's also worth noting that Slade had a better squad than Warnock did . Slade had most of the players we had playing in Prem
Absolute bollox
Name them?....... Most of the players from our prem team who were playing for us last season?
They're referring to the 13/14 season, which was Slade's first
But for 15/16 he still had the following (that Warnock doesn't have): David Marshall, Fabio, Ben Turner, Kenwyne Jones
14/15 (the season people are referring to): David Marshall, Fabio, Ben Turner, Kevin McNaughton, Kevin Theophile-Catherine, Kenwyne Jones, Juan Cala, Magnus Wolff Eikrem, Mats Moller Daehli, Jo Inge Berget, Kim Bo-Kyung
We know you're a clueless clown who loves the bait. We get that.
A valid comparison between Slade and Warnock should be based on their first seasons in charge. Both took over at the same point in the season after a managerial sacking.
If Trollope was a negative on Slade's record, how come Slade's points per game average shot up after Trollope was appointed?
But you really know all of this, you're just trying on a wind up.
2014/15 season we finished 11th 16 points off the play-offs
2016/17 season we finished 12th 18 points off the play-offs
So I think you will find that I was right in saying that Warnock should have
done better with his experience and the coaching staff he has.
Try and keep it civil old chap.
You are definitely on a wind up. Why on earth are you comparing the end of season figures? They include the dreadful start we made. Why include how many points we finished adrift of the playoffs? This season saw an unusually high points tally for finishing 6th. Why include league positions? Our league record in 2014/15 would have seen us 13th this season. I despair at trying to work out your lack of logic if you're not on a wind up.
In 2014/15, we had 13 points after 11 games when Slade took over. He won 49 points from 35 games.
In 2016/17, we had 8 points after 11 games (my OP says 7 which was a typo) when Warnock took over. He won 54 points from 35 games.
That is the valid comparison. There is no criticism of Slade involved here. It is my opinion that our recovery under Warnock is more remarkable due to the players at his disposal, we had a worse squad than Slade inherited; the standard of our performances under Trollope, which were dire and worse than they were under Solskjaer; plus our league position, where we were deeply in the mire.
Yet you seem to think he should have done better because 6th place in the league had more points than it did 2 seasons ago. Incredible.
I prefer the style & tempo of football played under Warnock.
I found the Slade style & tempo mind-numbingly boring.
Comparison of points gained cannot support comparison of managers.
For me the Warnock 'factor' > the Slade 'factor'.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote