Just a few observations on how well Warnock has done

[Tandy]

In January, Slade spent £750k on Doyle, not good enough. £150k on Revell, who wasn't good enough, O'Keefe who was OK for £750k and Malone who cost £150k. He also spent £250k on bringing McAleny and Kennedy to the club. Warnock has not spent a penny, and has more points per game than Slade, even during Slade's good runs.

Ever tried taking the blinkers off before you post?

Also, you even admit it yourself, Warnock has done a better job.

Well if you think I'm going to be dancing in the street because NW managed to get us 5 more points than our previous manager then you are very much mistaken.

Eric the half wit is suggesting Warnock has pulled of some sort of miracle where clearly I've proved the stats show there is little difference between them.

[JKB]

I think people can see that it is you on the wind up.
You said " A valid comparison between Slade and Warnock should be based on their first seasons in charge"

I gave you a valid comparison.
2014/15 season Trollope was only involved for the last 16 games
2016/17 season Warnock brought in a full management team with him.
Don't keep banging on about the squad Warnock had to work with. After all he has had umpteen promotions which you remind us every other post.
I'm not sticking up for the previous manager but in my opinion Warnock has not done much better.

Remind me what division is Russ managing in these days and how many clubs dismissed him this season? Warnock is a proven championship manager who has also managed in the premiership.

Slade served up the worst football witnessed since we got promoted back to the championship and not picking the likes of Gunner and Fabio on a regular basis was a joke.

The purchase of Revell summed up how poor a manager he was and he should never have been allowed to manage a championship club and he never will again.

[JKB]

Greg Halford is one of the worst signings we've ever made

Revell takes that accolade for me, never a championship player garbage.