Fighting terrorism:
http://news.sky.com/story/theresa-ma...error-10906543
Not supporting it:
https://order-order.com/2017/06/06/c...bers-at-rally/
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Fighting terrorism:
http://news.sky.com/story/theresa-ma...error-10906543
Not supporting it:
https://order-order.com/2017/06/06/c...bers-at-rally/
Interesting post can't wait for the comments.
I would absolutely love to lose all of my human rights, where do I sign up?
I have a problem with this one.
"And I mean doing more to restrict the freedom and the movements of terrorist suspects when we have enough evidence to know they are a threat, but not enough evidence to prosecute them in full in court."
Here's why. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regula...owers_Act_2000 was brought in under the same pretext. But instead it's been routinely used for minor incidents...
Councils launch eight spying ops on Brits A DAY using RIPA
Law designed for spooks, used against smokers - https://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/0...gbrotherwatch/
This is the Theresa we know and love from her Home Secretary days. Internet censorship, elimination of encryption and the destruction of human rights. Just like with the Snoopers Charter, she always returns to her old themes.
She was very wise to deliver this speech to a specially selected group of party members in a sealed off area. And not one Strong & Stable banner in sight
Nothing more than a cynical attempt to grab votes from your ukip types. If I'm not mistaken, all but one of the ten terrorists attackers since 2005 were UK born.
It is weird how easy it is to just change these kind of laws but how hard it is to change the laws that allow millionaires to avoid paying tax.
You either support terrorism or you fight it. It's utterly clear.
Or you pretend to fight terrorism whilst you're really intent on stripping away the privacy and civil liberties of your own citizens. What's utterly clear to all except the deliberately blind is you don't fight terrorism by being huge chums with the creator of ISIS and flog them billions worth of arms some of which are given directly to ISIS. Corbyn hasn't clocked this particular Tyrannosaurus rex in the telephone box which suggests he's controlled opposition.
Depends on his motivation I guess. If (as it appears now) 'anti terror laws' just refers to knee-jerk broad sweeping powers that will a) make no difference and b) be abused, then I agree with him. If it means locking people up without trial just because they are a bit suspicious, then I agree with him.
If you truly believe he voted against it because he 'loves terrorists' then feel free to stick your x wherever you feel is suitable.
Corbyn invited IRA leaders to the House of Commons immediately after the Brighton Bombing, he referred to Hamas & Hezbollah as his friends & despite numerous requests he has consistently refused to condemn the IRA.
In addition John McDonnell thinks that Bobby Sands & co should be honoured & Diane Abbott wanted the British state to be defeated in Northern Ireland.
I don't know about you but I think that there is more than enough evidence there to make a sound judgement on their attitudes towards terrorists.
mutha theresa is a fookin commie
I am on my phone so not so easy to reply to all of that.
Honest answer, I don't really care. I can understand why people who were involved would care but I think elections should be about the future rather than the past. Britain has had too many enemies that have turned to friends and vice versa to judge. Britain have also had enemies and positions that virtually no one in the political classes challenged, Corbyn did and was proved right in the end.
Is our agenda on terrorism working? I was in London on Saturday night and it feels to me that our interventions abroad and our commitment to trying to beat an ideology with bombs isn't providing the results. I don't think a different approach is such a dangerous idea.
Theresa May's vision for Britain (and yours) sounds a lot like North Korea, support the government position or else and sacrifice spending on schools, policing and healthcare in order to maintain a huge scary military. We will end up thick, ill and fundamentally unsafe but at least we can keep bombing the Middle East.
Wonder if Theresa May was campaigning for Nelson Mandele to be released thirty years ago when elements within the Conservative party were saying he was a terrorist and I wonder what her attitude was to the situation described here?
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-10507850.html
If questions have to be asked about what politicians from the main opposition party were doing and saying decades ago, I don't get why the same isn't true of politicians within the Governing party.