Capture.jpgOriginally Posted by I.8.POLITICAL.CORRECTNESS
that's an actress playing the part of a "victim" don't be taken in by it ladies and gents
question everything
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Capture.jpgthat's an actress playing the part of a "victim" don't be taken in by it ladies and gents
question everything
as for the question, the people were injured by flash burns
listening to a bomb expert on TV, the bomb would have produced a fireball ( flash ) as it was not packed with nut and bolts etc etc to cause more damage
thus people have suffered burns
I never listened to the bomb expert but would be interested to know how this fireball flash put 20 odd in hospital, but left the white plastic in almost pristine condition and 80% of the lidl bag intact
What a waste of 30 seconds listening to the bomb expert when you could have come on here instead, the expert was probably in on it and telling porkies, and the presenters, and the camera operators, runners, producer, sound department, graphics, all their families... All bloody in on it.
The strongest carrier bags on the market. Still only 10p while stocks last!!
Time to step up Tesco.
What is the actresses name?that's an actress playing the part of a "victim" don't be taken in by it ladies and gents
question everything
Actressthat's an actress playing the part of a "victim" don't be taken in by it ladies and gents
question everything
Could you name her please.
She's not an actress, she is a BBC reporter and an eyewitness to this attrocity who was right there when the bucket went off.that's an actress playing the part of a "victim" don't be taken in by it ladies and gents
question everything
Why is there ALWAYS a BBC reporter right next to the incident?
Ask organ Morgan, king of the conspiracy theorists, he knowsWhy is there ALWAYS a BBC reporter right next to the incident?
Well well.
I searched about and couldn't find anything on that, could you provide a link ?
We must protect the people, especially children. Search everyone and their baggage before allowing them to travel on public transport. Productivity, GDP and the economy will suffer hugely but never mind. Fill the skies with surveillance drones. Double the number of CCTV cameras. We already have more than any other country. Let's aim to have more than the rest of the world combined. Reverse the cuts in police numbers by employing another 30,000 coppers. Bump up both Income Tax and VAT by 5% to pay for it all.
IMO it's time to ignore civil liberties and scoop up any potential terrorists that are on surveillance and being deemed as high risk.
It seems that this / these terrorists were known to the authorities.
I forsee no problems whatsoever with this course of action.
He wud of noked them out.
Me neither. It's a brilliant idea, I can't understand why no one has thought of it before. Guilty or not, round em up and put them all on Flatholm until they can prove that they won't blow anyone up.
That's a really good idea.
They're doing something similar in the Philippines at the moment with drug addicts. It's quite important to give governments sweeping powers in the name of our security (feck me, isn't it all so dangerous these days?) and they will never abuse these powers right?
I'd be completely happy for the Government to put us all under surveillance for 24 hours a day (oh, we are already?) just to stop us getting our eyebrows singed by these bombs that are exploding at a rate of once every 10 years.
Perhaps I missed your point, and you are only talking about the brown people?
Armed police at Stratford station today
I expect the cast of Eastenders where out in force there then.
I hate to go all Lesley Phillips on you the redhead is rather a spiffing bit of top London totty !!!
Belated commiserations for Throbbing Gristle. I knew he was knocking on but it came as a shock to learn he had turned his paws up.
He rutted his way through many a garden party of designer dogs
He's left his mark round these parts the old sea beast
God bless him
Really ?
Islamic terrorism, extremism and militancy is rife throughout the whole world.
You, and the rest of the UK knew that this, relatively minor, incident wasn't going to be so called white supremacists, Buddhists, Sikhs or Hindus.
We all knew that it was going to be a Muslim, irrespective of the individual's skin colour.
Are you racist enough to claim that all Muslims have brown skin !
I don't.
Muslim terrorists, extremists and militants are evil bastards.
Those who radicalise and indoctrinate are evil bastards.
A significantly higher number of those who protect and directly support the above, are evil bastards.
An even significantly higher number who cheer and celebrate these type of actions are evil bastards.
These incidents in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world are the tip of iceberg as the vast majority of potential incidents/attacks are prevented by security forces.
There is a significant problem world wide and the common denominator is Islam.
Many Muslims are very nice people.
It is not the nice or decent Muslims that we should be concerned about, but to summarily dismiss a very real worldwide problem on the basis that some Muslims have a different colour skin to you, me or anyone who dares to criticise is ludicrous.
I had the same skin colour as the IRA terrorists.
I hated them with a passion, as any sane person would.
Why should we feel any differently now, because it's Islamic terrorism, extremism and militancy.
I hate the actions, not the skin colour.
I have been back on the forum for a few days, and in that time I have come to a reasoned conclusion that you are unable to comprehend any points being made.
My point is very very simple. We are not getting bombed left, right and centre. No-one is. There is little risk to anyone, even those living in New York, or London, getting blown up by a terrorist.
How many terrorist incidents have there been in the UK since 2001? How about before?
The facts are that the Government is happy to erode our privacy purely to protect us from a bomb every few years. And, because of all the fear mongering in the Murdoch owned press, we all meekly accept it because we are all under the illusion that there is a bomb about to go off at any moment.
Your post is filled with assumptions, and it is filled with contradictions.
My point about "brown people" is that the person who thinks it's ok to have more surveillance is supposing that these invasions of privacy will not affect him. The fact is, they do. Councils have used anti-terrorism legislation to punish people for putting the wrong items in the wrong recycling bins.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...in-crimes.html
What else?
Your post is daft, and you are dafter.
Definitely a conspiracy theory like because if the government were planning something like this they'd definitely leave little clues like a lidl bag completely intact so the more clever ones could spot it.
Same as when sandy hook used actors they used the same ones in the Super Bowl half time show as a wink to the ones of us who are more clued up.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote