Click here for Cardiff City personalised gift shop
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 61 to 90 of 93

Thread: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

  1. #61

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Why would a brand new poster know about and bump a thread from four months ago?


  2. #62

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
    Why would a brand new poster know about and bump a thread from four months ago?

    Try a 15 month bump
    & maybe I was scrolling through threads to see what else is around I was actually looking to see what AAMB was but staggered across this?

  3. #63

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer46 View Post
    Try a 15 month bump
    & maybe I was scrolling through threads to see what else is around I was actually looking to see what AAMB was but staggered across this?
    AAMB? AAIB you mean? Give it a rest Roathie.. Much more fun when you thought you were Jordan Belfort..

  4. #64

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer46 View Post
    Try a 15 month bump
    & maybe I was scrolling through threads to see what else is around I was actually looking to see what AAMB was but staggered across this?
    You're right, November 2017. When I clicked on old pages of threads, page 200 was still only march 2018 so that's quite some scrolling.

  5. #65

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
    You're right, November 2017. When I clicked on old pages of threads, page 200 was still only march 2018 so that's quite some scrolling.
    God I hope this isn’t Dembe 😳

  6. #66

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
    Again, not that its any of your business officer, but I was Polo on AAMB, not on CCMB.

    Yes I was CCFC Casual, and thats the only name thats been permanently been banned on here because Croesy was a hypocritical cry arse.

    So, no, I havent been Polo.etc.etc.etc.etc on here. Hes wrong. I have had two names, and never tried to disguise that I was once CCFC Casual.

    Unlike Croesy, who has been banned more times than Mark Dennis had bookings, and also tries to create different personas but always ends up showing his true colours. Wanker.

    The guy pretended to be his wife ffs. Proper weirdo.
    Lol you were polo, banned off aamb how many times? Fake valley hooligan calling me a hooligan.....just smile

  7. #67
    International Mrs Steve R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Barry
    Posts
    28,983
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Strange bump

  8. #68

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyer46 View Post
    Try a 15 month bump
    & maybe I was scrolling through threads to see what else is around I was actually looking to see what AAMB was but staggered across this?
    Bored out of you’re tiny mind again is it? So bored in Queensland you came home I hear? Why don’t you just post as E20 on here too....

  9. #69

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Goats,
    Put me out of my misery........who is Roathie ?

  10. #70

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Talk about giving the game away, pillock

  11. #71

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    That's not the REAL Croesy but someone who started using the handle to annoy the real Croesy.

    I have, currently, 10 accounts that I will use as backup for my inevitable banning. Sounds odd and or excessive right? I agree, but here is my history on this board over the years.

    Started as Euclid. Received threats from prominent user that, when reported to the inconsistent Mike Morris, nothing happened. When those threats then displayed homophobic language and emails ( I used to share my real name and email address) I again complained to Morris. Nothing happened. At the time the prominent user was advertising books on the site and Morris allowed that together with threats and homophobic speech, and when I told him I could no longer post - he said diddly squat. The reason I was getting grief? I was criticising the hooligan element at the club.

    Prominent user leaves to set up his own board, so I started posting as Loya Jirga which evolved to Kaiser Jirga II after Germany beat England. I soon started getting threats from a different user for criticising Hammam, including this user mentioning the make of car I drove and where I lived. Complaints again to Morris . All ignored. Thames Valley Bluebird did act but, again the person issuing the threats received no ban. However, at the exact same time the person issuing the threats complained about a joke from Baker - Baker was banned. For a joke that only the threatening poster found offensive!

    This time, I carried on posting and part of these postings were criticising Ridsdale. Note the pattern!!!!! I have a history of criticising shit owners. That'll come in handy as you read on (I appreciate I've lost 95pc of readers already because of tl;dr). Apparently, at this time I was a "good" poster because the majority of people agreed with me.

    Then there was the rebrand. I criticised Tan, and still do. But Tan spends money, now I am a "bad" poster for criticising. I am banned for the crime of pointing out the terrible crime of pointing out the stupidity of Cardiff selling two keepers in one window. A one year ban at that, one year more than the poster who made homophobic and threatening posts to me, one year more than the poster giving out personal details, and 51 weeks more than the poster who made a joke about under age sex.

    So, I set up other accounts.

    Three were banned sine die for "derailing a thread, trolling and being a shit stirrer". That is a lifetime longer than the homophobic and threatening poster, one lifetime longer than.... You get it.

    By the way, that ban was because, in one thread, the poster boy of the forum, derailed a thread by asking me a hypothetical question about Tan which I replied to be saying I would answer his questions in PM. Now, bear in mind that I did about 20-30 hours of unacknowledged, uncredited work for this poster - I assumed he had the social fortitude and respect to leave that debate offline. But, no, instead he responded in public. When I replied in public three accounts were banned sine die for "trolling". even though I was answering direct questions.

    After the FA Cup Final a few people mentioned they hadn't made recordings of the game. I made recordings and handed them to the posters at the game. Some people offered to pay or buy a drink and I refused because I like to do people favours. Those favours are quickly forgotten if you have the temerity to challenge the perceived norm on here.

    Other favours... Giving my fan number to Blue Matt (we had a decent chat queuing for Barnsley tickets for 7 hours), getting match day programmes for Caliburn, giving advice to SecureRed that got him out of a real problem (he very quickly forgot that too, calling me a prick here within a day) picking people up to get them to games.... all ok until you point out the owner is a slippery sod who cannot be trusted. But, I'd do all those things at the drop of a hat again - except the proof reading of TOBW's book, that was literally a thankless task - because I believe in community.

    Mike will refute all the above, his memory is terribly selective as is his implementation of GDPR rules with him passing on details of IP addresses - those posts soon disappeared when he realised he had ****ed that up too.



    **** you all

    #inb4theban #willbedeleted #echochambersRUs #9moreaccountd

  12. #72

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by JennyWren View Post
    That's not the REAL Croesy but someone who started using the handle to annoy the real Croesy.

    I have, currently, 10 accounts that I will use as backup for my inevitable banning. Sounds odd and or excessive right? I agree, but here is my history on this board over the years.

    Started as Euclid. Received threats from prominent user that, when reported to the inconsistent Mike Morris, nothing happened. When those threats then displayed homophobic language and emails ( I used to share my real name and email address) I again complained to Morris. Nothing happened. At the time the prominent user was advertising books on the site and Morris allowed that together with threats and homophobic speech, and when I told him I could no longer post - he said diddly squat. The reason I was getting grief? I was criticising the hooligan element at the club.

    Prominent user leaves to set up his own board, so I started posting as Loya Jirga which evolved to Kaiser Jirga II after Germany beat England. I soon started getting threats from a different user for criticising Hammam, including this user mentioning the make of car I drove and where I lived. Complaints again to Morris . All ignored. Thames Valley Bluebird did act but, again the person issuing the threats received no ban. However, at the exact same time the person issuing the threats complained about a joke from Baker - Baker was banned. For a joke that only the threatening poster found offensive!

    This time, I carried on posting and part of these postings were criticising Ridsdale. Note the pattern!!!!! I have a history of criticising shit owners. That'll come in handy as you read on (I appreciate I've lost 95pc of readers already because of tl;dr). Apparently, at this time I was a "good" poster because the majority of people agreed with me.

    Then there was the rebrand. I criticised Tan, and still do. But Tan spends money, now I am a "bad" poster for criticising. I am banned for the crime of pointing out the terrible crime of pointing out the stupidity of Cardiff selling two keepers in one window. A one year ban at that, one year more than the poster who made homophobic and threatening posts to me, one year more than the poster giving out personal details, and 51 weeks more than the poster who made a joke about under age sex.

    So, I set up other accounts.

    Three were banned sine die for "derailing a thread, trolling and being a shit stirrer". That is a lifetime longer than the homophobic and threatening poster, one lifetime longer than.... You get it.

    By the way, that ban was because, in one thread, the poster boy of the forum, derailed a thread by asking me a hypothetical question about Tan which I replied to be saying I would answer his questions in PM. Now, bear in mind that I did about 20-30 hours of unacknowledged, uncredited work for this poster - I assumed he had the social fortitude and respect to leave that debate offline. But, no, instead he responded in public. When I replied in public three accounts were banned sine die for "trolling". even though I was answering direct questions.

    After the FA Cup Final a few people mentioned they hadn't made recordings of the game. I made recordings and handed them to the posters at the game. Some people offered to pay or buy a drink and I refused because I like to do people favours. Those favours are quickly forgotten if you have the temerity to challenge the perceived norm on here.

    Other favours... Giving my fan number to Blue Matt (we had a decent chat queuing for Barnsley tickets for 7 hours), getting match day programmes for Caliburn, giving advice to SecureRed that got him out of a real problem (he very quickly forgot that too, calling me a prick here within a day) picking people up to get them to games.... all ok until you point out the owner is a slippery sod who cannot be trusted. But, I'd do all those things at the drop of a hat again - except the proof reading of TOBW's book, that was literally a thankless task - because I believe in community.

    Mike will refute all the above, his memory is terribly selective as is his implementation of GDPR rules with him passing on details of IP addresses - those posts soon disappeared when he realised he had ****ed that up too.



    **** you all

    #inb4theban #willbedeleted #echochambersRUs #9moreaccountd
    Cool story. Most people get along fine on here and have probably never been banned, but there are a few that appear to have been the victim of injustice after injustice. Weird innit.

  13. #73

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    I’ve never been banned or received threats on here despite disagreeing with loads of people. Weird that isn’t it.

    I did change my name to croesy to as a wind up but that must honestly have been more than 5 years ago.

  14. #74

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Imagine to have the lack of self awareness to post that post Jirga has. Imagine having the time and effort to do that and have 10 (ten!) accounts.

    I think it’s some time for reflection when this board makes you react like that. It’s genuinely worrying tbh.

  15. #75

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Playing the victim too, every time he gets banned and changes his account he tries to appear to be a new user but he’s so transparent you can spot it’s him almost immediately.

  16. #76

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts



    'Jirga spotted on CCTV attempting to rejoin the messageboard following his latest ban'

  17. #77

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Come on now Jirga. You weren't banned for a year for saying that Cardiff sold two keepers. Don't be silly.

  18. #78

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Cardiff sold two keepers

  19. #79

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    JennyWren,
    OMG that is a humdinger of a message..... I am trying to get my head around it all
    Why would homophobic language come into threats to you? I am guessing that your sexual preferences were brought into question?

    I deplore any threatening over gender preferences & certainly draw the line at that sort of thing. I am very shocked that anyone would bring references of underage sex into any public messageboard.

    The whole message has shocked me to the core, I think a line hasn't just been crossed, it has been run past to a point where the line is so far behind that it can't be seen anymore.

    I like a wind up as much as the next man.... I can't stand it when it gets deep like you have mentioned, I hope you dealt with the idiots that were attacking you with homophobic references & threats? I was confused by the reference to homophobia & the reference to a poster made derogatory marks about the nationality of your wife ( that twisted my melons )

    I have taken what you have said onboard & it wouldn't be something I could or would accept if I was treated or threatened that way, so far everything slung at me on here is 'water off a ducks back'

    Everyone should be treated equally, as no one on here really knows who I am I could be Gay, I could be Transgender, I could be a Lesbian, I could be a Hermaphrodite or I could just be a regular guy? Does it really matter?

    I am what I am, I am happy with what I am & so life goes on

  20. #80

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    i thought aamb was bad for pettiness and just general immaturity but this board appears to be as bad! i can't believe what i'm reading, you're all grown men right?

  21. #81

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by JennyWren View Post
    That's not the REAL Croesy but someone who started using the handle to annoy the real Croesy.

    I have, currently, 10 accounts that I will use as backup for my inevitable banning. Sounds odd and or excessive right? I agree, but here is my history on this board over the years.

    Started as Euclid. Received threats from prominent user that, when reported to the inconsistent Mike Morris, nothing happened. When those threats then displayed homophobic language and emails ( I used to share my real name and email address) I again complained to Morris. Nothing happened. At the time the prominent user was advertising books on the site and Morris allowed that together with threats and homophobic speech, and when I told him I could no longer post - he said diddly squat. The reason I was getting grief? I was criticising the hooligan element at the club.

    Prominent user leaves to set up his own board, so I started posting as Loya Jirga which evolved to Kaiser Jirga II after Germany beat England. I soon started getting threats from a different user for criticising Hammam, including this user mentioning the make of car I drove and where I lived. Complaints again to Morris . All ignored. Thames Valley Bluebird did act but, again the person issuing the threats received no ban. However, at the exact same time the person issuing the threats complained about a joke from Baker - Baker was banned. For a joke that only the threatening poster found offensive!

    This time, I carried on posting and part of these postings were criticising Ridsdale. Note the pattern!!!!! I have a history of criticising shit owners. That'll come in handy as you read on (I appreciate I've lost 95pc of readers already because of tl;dr). Apparently, at this time I was a "good" poster because the majority of people agreed with me.

    Then there was the rebrand. I criticised Tan, and still do. But Tan spends money, now I am a "bad" poster for criticising. I am banned for the crime of pointing out the terrible crime of pointing out the stupidity of Cardiff selling two keepers in one window. A one year ban at that, one year more than the poster who made homophobic and threatening posts to me, one year more than the poster giving out personal details, and 51 weeks more than the poster who made a joke about under age sex.

    So, I set up other accounts.

    Three were banned sine die for "derailing a thread, trolling and being a shit stirrer". That is a lifetime longer than the homophobic and threatening poster, one lifetime longer than.... You get it.

    By the way, that ban was because, in one thread, the poster boy of the forum, derailed a thread by asking me a hypothetical question about Tan which I replied to be saying I would answer his questions in PM. Now, bear in mind that I did about 20-30 hours of unacknowledged, uncredited work for this poster - I assumed he had the social fortitude and respect to leave that debate offline. But, no, instead he responded in public. When I replied in public three accounts were banned sine die for "trolling". even though I was answering direct questions.

    After the FA Cup Final a few people mentioned they hadn't made recordings of the game. I made recordings and handed them to the posters at the game. Some people offered to pay or buy a drink and I refused because I like to do people favours. Those favours are quickly forgotten if you have the temerity to challenge the perceived norm on here.

    Other favours... Giving my fan number to Blue Matt (we had a decent chat queuing for Barnsley tickets for 7 hours), getting match day programmes for Caliburn, giving advice to SecureRed that got him out of a real problem (he very quickly forgot that too, calling me a prick here within a day) picking people up to get them to games.... all ok until you point out the owner is a slippery sod who cannot be trusted. But, I'd do all those things at the drop of a hat again - except the proof reading of TOBW's book, that was literally a thankless task - because I believe in community.

    Mike will refute all the above, his memory is terribly selective as is his implementation of GDPR rules with him passing on details of IP addresses - those posts soon disappeared when he realised he had ****ed that up too.



    **** you all

    #inb4theban #willbedeleted #echochambersRUs #9moreaccountd
    K’nell man what an odd ball

  22. #82

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by JennyWren View Post
    That's not the REAL Croesy but someone who started using the handle to annoy the real Croesy.

    I have, currently, 10 accounts that I will use as backup for my inevitable banning. Sounds odd and or excessive right? I agree, but here is my history on this board over the years.

    Started as Euclid. Received threats from prominent user that, when reported to the inconsistent Mike Morris, nothing happened. When those threats then displayed homophobic language and emails ( I used to share my real name and email address) I again complained to Morris. Nothing happened. At the time the prominent user was advertising books on the site and Morris allowed that together with threats and homophobic speech, and when I told him I could no longer post - he said diddly squat. The reason I was getting grief? I was criticising the hooligan element at the club.

    Prominent user leaves to set up his own board, so I started posting as Loya Jirga which evolved to Kaiser Jirga II after Germany beat England. I soon started getting threats from a different user for criticising Hammam, including this user mentioning the make of car I drove and where I lived. Complaints again to Morris . All ignored. Thames Valley Bluebird did act but, again the person issuing the threats received no ban. However, at the exact same time the person issuing the threats complained about a joke from Baker - Baker was banned. For a joke that only the threatening poster found offensive!

    This time, I carried on posting and part of these postings were criticising Ridsdale. Note the pattern!!!!! I have a history of criticising shit owners. That'll come in handy as you read on (I appreciate I've lost 95pc of readers already because of tl;dr). Apparently, at this time I was a "good" poster because the majority of people agreed with me.

    Then there was the rebrand. I criticised Tan, and still do. But Tan spends money, now I am a "bad" poster for criticising. I am banned for the crime of pointing out the terrible crime of pointing out the stupidity of Cardiff selling two keepers in one window. A one year ban at that, one year more than the poster who made homophobic and threatening posts to me, one year more than the poster giving out personal details, and 51 weeks more than the poster who made a joke about under age sex.

    So, I set up other accounts.

    Three were banned sine die for "derailing a thread, trolling and being a shit stirrer". That is a lifetime longer than the homophobic and threatening poster, one lifetime longer than.... You get it.

    By the way, that ban was because, in one thread, the poster boy of the forum, derailed a thread by asking me a hypothetical question about Tan which I replied to be saying I would answer his questions in PM. Now, bear in mind that I did about 20-30 hours of unacknowledged, uncredited work for this poster - I assumed he had the social fortitude and respect to leave that debate offline. But, no, instead he responded in public. When I replied in public three accounts were banned sine die for "trolling". even though I was answering direct questions.

    After the FA Cup Final a few people mentioned they hadn't made recordings of the game. I made recordings and handed them to the posters at the game. Some people offered to pay or buy a drink and I refused because I like to do people favours. Those favours are quickly forgotten if you have the temerity to challenge the perceived norm on here.

    Other favours... Giving my fan number to Blue Matt (we had a decent chat queuing for Barnsley tickets for 7 hours), getting match day programmes for Caliburn, giving advice to SecureRed that got him out of a real problem (he very quickly forgot that too, calling me a prick here within a day) picking people up to get them to games.... all ok until you point out the owner is a slippery sod who cannot be trusted. But, I'd do all those things at the drop of a hat again - except the proof reading of TOBW's book, that was literally a thankless task - because I believe in community.

    Mike will refute all the above, his memory is terribly selective as is his implementation of GDPR rules with him passing on details of IP addresses - those posts soon disappeared when he realised he had ****ed that up too.



    **** you all

    #inb4theban #willbedeleted #echochambersRUs #9moreaccountd
    Building up your role a bit here I think, it's an internet messageboard you're not Robin Hood. Although saying that, the ending made me laugh - massive long post finished with **** you all, fair play

  23. #83
    International Mrs Steve R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Barry
    Posts
    28,983
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by jamieccfc View Post
    K’nell man what an odd ball
    Bit harsh, there is a guy who comes to where I work to buy his supplies and sits in central writing down train numbers all day

  24. #84

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R View Post
    Bit harsh, there is a guy who comes to where I work to buy his supplies and sits in central writing down train numbers all day
    Get them some coconut oil

  25. #85
    International Mrs Steve R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Barry
    Posts
    28,983
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by jamieccfc View Post
    Get them some coconut oil

    It doesn't stop you being an odd ball, I'm proof of that

  26. #86

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by JennyWren View Post
    That's not the REAL Croesy but someone who started using the handle to annoy the real Croesy.

    I have, currently, 10 accounts that I will use as backup for my inevitable banning. Sounds odd and or excessive right? I agree, but here is my history on this board over the years.

    Started as Euclid. Received threats from prominent user that, when reported to the inconsistent Mike Morris, nothing happened. When those threats then displayed homophobic language and emails ( I used to share my real name and email address) I again complained to Morris. Nothing happened. At the time the prominent user was advertising books on the site and Morris allowed that together with threats and homophobic speech, and when I told him I could no longer post - he said diddly squat. The reason I was getting grief? I was criticising the hooligan element at the club.

    Prominent user leaves to set up his own board, so I started posting as Loya Jirga which evolved to Kaiser Jirga II after Germany beat England. I soon started getting threats from a different user for criticising Hammam, including this user mentioning the make of car I drove and where I lived. Complaints again to Morris . All ignored. Thames Valley Bluebird did act but, again the person issuing the threats received no ban. However, at the exact same time the person issuing the threats complained about a joke from Baker - Baker was banned. For a joke that only the threatening poster found offensive!

    This time, I carried on posting and part of these postings were criticising Ridsdale. Note the pattern!!!!! I have a history of criticising shit owners. That'll come in handy as you read on (I appreciate I've lost 95pc of readers already because of tl;dr). Apparently, at this time I was a "good" poster because the majority of people agreed with me.

    Then there was the rebrand. I criticised Tan, and still do. But Tan spends money, now I am a "bad" poster for criticising. I am banned for the crime of pointing out the terrible crime of pointing out the stupidity of Cardiff selling two keepers in one window. A one year ban at that, one year more than the poster who made homophobic and threatening posts to me, one year more than the poster giving out personal details, and 51 weeks more than the poster who made a joke about under age sex.

    So, I set up other accounts.

    Three were banned sine die for "derailing a thread, trolling and being a shit stirrer". That is a lifetime longer than the homophobic and threatening poster, one lifetime longer than.... You get it.

    By the way, that ban was because, in one thread, the poster boy of the forum, derailed a thread by asking me a hypothetical question about Tan which I replied to be saying I would answer his questions in PM. Now, bear in mind that I did about 20-30 hours of unacknowledged, uncredited work for this poster - I assumed he had the social fortitude and respect to leave that debate offline. But, no, instead he responded in public. When I replied in public three accounts were banned sine die for "trolling". even though I was answering direct questions.

    After the FA Cup Final a few people mentioned they hadn't made recordings of the game. I made recordings and handed them to the posters at the game. Some people offered to pay or buy a drink and I refused because I like to do people favours. Those favours are quickly forgotten if you have the temerity to challenge the perceived norm on here.

    Other favours... Giving my fan number to Blue Matt (we had a decent chat queuing for Barnsley tickets for 7 hours), getting match day programmes for Caliburn, giving advice to SecureRed that got him out of a real problem (he very quickly forgot that too, calling me a prick here within a day) picking people up to get them to games.... all ok until you point out the owner is a slippery sod who cannot be trusted. But, I'd do all those things at the drop of a hat again - except the proof reading of TOBW's book, that was literally a thankless task - because I believe in community.

    Mike will refute all the above, his memory is terribly selective as is his implementation of GDPR rules with him passing on details of IP addresses - those posts soon disappeared when he realised he had ****ed that up too.



    **** you all

    #inb4theban #willbedeleted #echochambersRUs #9moreaccountd


    Please dont delete this. This is gold.

  27. #87

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Looking at the good folk posting on here, I think I'm in the wrong form.

    But if it helps, I'm totally opposed to the use of multi-names. I mean, what really is the point - and psychiatrically, doesn't it smack of some sort of phrenia?

  28. #88

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclops View Post
    Looking at the good folk posting on here, I think I'm in the wrong form.

    But if it helps, I'm totally opposed to the use of multi-names. I mean, what really is the point - and psychiatrically, doesn't it smack of some sort of phrenia?
    Is that you, Portsmouth Blue?

  29. #89

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Quote Originally Posted by Taunton Blue Genie View Post
    Is that you, Portsmouth Blue?
    It's PompeyBlue - I've met him - but he doesn't seem to post on here these days.

    Get a grip, mush!

  30. #90

    Re: People who decide to wrongly accuse other users of having other accounts

    Who am I the alternative account for? it must be one of you?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •