Reply With QuoteI would agree with the life term but Charles Bronson is a complete wanker , he's about as evil as a man can get , don't like the idea of scumballs like him getting pleasure from attacking sex offenders , he's a ****Originally Posted by ninianclark
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
He should never be allowed out, he is an obvious danger to the public.
I would agree with the life term but Charles Bronson is a complete wanker , he's about as evil as a man can get , don't like the idea of scumballs like him getting pleasure from attacking sex offenders , he's a ****
So what is the point of paying to keep him alive?
Perhaps he can stick some objects up Venables arse see how he likes it. Second thoughts he’d probably enjoy it.
What about rapists ?
They should deffo be hanged , if hanging was brought back , they ruin women's lives
I would rather stick them in prison
There is no worse crime than crimes against children Sludge no matter how much you try to justify it by throwing other heinous crimes into the mix.
Bronson would enjoy doing it , he's probably got a prisoner for a bitch
I think raping a woman and beating the shit out of her is just as bad as child abuse
The likes of Brady, Huntley, Huntley.etc where it’s been proved beyond all doubt that they committed the heinous crimes that they did should be swinging from a tree with no right to appeal.
With respect Sludge you likened beating up a homeless smack head as bad a crime as a child getting molested earlier in the thread.
Just watching a programme on Peter Tobin , serial killer and rapist
He's just as bad as a child abuser
and should be swinging from a tree
No i didn't I said drunken ***** who beat up and kill homeless people are evil twats who are just as bad as child abusers
You mentioned smack , not me , many homeless people have mental health problems and are very vulnerable
Just like young children
A evil **** is an evil ****
Well if we had capital punishment , he would be
But we don't
Some are. Most are there because they are junkie / alchy scum.
Because of excusers and liberal twats who believe these fiends have human rights too
They are also probably more likely to be care leavers and also to have been abused as children. I wonder when they become a less worthy victim to JR, it is 16, 18 or 21?
As long as you are comfortable with the fact that the CJS will murder an innocent person eventually then the death penalty as a method of cost reduction is a sound theory I think.
24
What part of “Beyond any doubt” did you not understand?
As Eric says below a significant amount of alchy drunken scum as you put ii are people who’ve lived their lives in the system through abandonment and abuse.
I know as I spent 13 years in the police and three in Probation.
Think about that before you make statements that make you sound an obnoxious twat
**** off
That's not why though is it? You need to try and look at the bigger picture when it comes I capital punishment and how many negatives there are to it.
Cost
How hard it is to be beyond reasonable doubt
No way back if a mistake is made
Giving a government the power to kill
That it isn't an actual detterant
You can call people liberal twunts all you want because they aren't short sighted zealots like you but murder's human rights aren't a reason.
You are an obnoxious twat, can't take anyone's opinion on board without throwing insults about.
No wonder you need to take breaks from a messagebord.
Well I am pretty sure I have heard it before and it has proved to be wrong.
Posting Permissions