Michael Flynn Guilty

[Wales-Bales]

Always knew you were right on this one. Well done you!

Bumpety Bump

[cyril evans awaydays]

Bumpety Bump

Well you are forever going on about how you called things right two years ahead of time without much evidence so I thought you might be pleased when you got an actual example.

I'd make some enquiries into who hacked your account in the intervening period to constantly and incorrectly argue the complete opposite though. My money is on some IT guy from Pakistan!

[Wales-Bales]

Well you are forever going on about how you called things right two years ahead of time without much evidence so I thought you might be pleased when you got an actual example.

I'd make some enquiries into who hacked your account in the intervening period to constantly and incorrectly argue the complete opposite though. My money is on some IT guy from Pakistan!

To be fair to Flynn, this entire case probably needs a judicial review after the Mueller team were caught manufacturing evidence, and fraudulently altering existing evidence.

[cyril evans awaydays]

To be fair to Flynn, this entire case probably needs a judicial review after the Mueller team were caught manufacturing evidence, and fraudulently altering existing evidence.

Haven't got any links to any factual evidence to support either of those statements do you?

Here's an extract from the 92 page legal judgement as a starter for 10.

The Court first considers Mr. Flynn’s requests and the
parties’ arguments, then analyzes Mr. Flynn’s request for
classified information, and concludes that Mr. Flynn has failed
to establish a single Brady violation. Before turning to the
specific requests, the Court will address the ethical concerns
with Mr. Flynn’s brief and Mr. Flynn’s misapplication of Brady
and its progeny.

[Wales-Bales]

Here's an extract from the 92 page legal judgement as a starter for 10.

The Court first considers Mr. Flynn’s requests and the
parties’ arguments, then analyzes Mr. Flynn’s request for
classified information, and concludes that Mr. Flynn has failed
to establish a single Brady violation. Before turning to the
specific requests, the Court will address the ethical concerns
with Mr. Flynn’s brief and Mr. Flynn’s misapplication of Brady
and its progeny.

Could you explain what this means?

I'd have thought the fact that the same people doctored the evidence against Page would be a big red flag, but maybe I'm just old fashioned.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Could you explain what this means?

I'd have thought the fact that the same people doctored the evidence against Page would be a big red flag, but maybe I'm just old fashioned.

Certainly,

Flynn and his new brief sought to argue that under the Brady obligations they were not provided with evidence as required that would exonerate him. The court classified the itemised things that Flynn's lawyer wanted into 6 types:

1.Information that Does Not Exist
2. Information the Government Does Not Possess
3. Information Mr. Flynn Concedes He Is Not Entitled to
4. Information that Has Already Been Provided
5. Information that Is Unrelated to the Charges Against Mr. Flynn or to His Sentencing
6. Remaining Requests

In each case the Judge found against Flynn and cast doubt on his lawyer's understanding of Brady and had some questions about her ethical behaviour.

It also concluded on your fabrication smears that "Having carefully reviewed the interviewing FBI agents’ notes, the draft interview reports, the final version of the FD302, and the statements contained therein, the Court agrees with the government that those documents are “consistent and clear that [Mr. Flynn] made multiple false statements to the [FBI] agents about his communications with the Russian Ambassador on January 24, 2017.

I'd go and find a different fence to fall off if I were you!

[Wales-Bales]

Certainly,

Flynn and his new brief sought to argue that under the Brady obligations they were not provided with evidence as required that would exonerate him. The court classified the itemised things that Flynn's lawyer wanted into 6 types:

1.Information that Does Not Exist
2. Information the Government Does Not Possess
3. Information Mr. Flynn Concedes He Is Not Entitled to
4. Information that Has Already Been Provided
5. Information that Is Unrelated to the Charges Against Mr. Flynn or to His Sentencing
6. Remaining Requests

In each case the Judge found against Flynn and cast doubt on his lawyer's understanding of Brady and had some questions about her ethical behaviour.

It also concluded on your fabrication smears that "Having carefully reviewed the interviewing FBI agents’ notes, the draft interview reports, the final version of the FD302, and the statements contained therein, the Court agrees with the government that those documents are “consistent and clear that [Mr. Flynn] made multiple false statements to the [FBI] agents about his communications with the Russian Ambassador on January 24, 2017.

I'd go and find a different fence to fall off if I were you!

So what you are explicitly saying is that there was no funny business going on?

Can I trust you after your total humiliation over the Steele Dossier, Trump Russia Collusion and the Mueller Obstruction of Justice Report, or should I wait until he's sent to jail?